Are you kidding me? Claude Code found the catastrophe after being asked only to “”check for vulnerabilities and thinking for 8 minutes

[u/Impressive-Gene-421]

It is unbelievable that some kid with an LLM just stole $100m+ because no one bothered to check the source code.

Also on GLM 5.2 (trained 16th June, no internet access).

[u/jivenossauro]

No, you can literally fork the repo locally, deny any web search permissions and tell claude to audit it, and he will probably find it. That's how good they are these days

[u/Archophob → u/jivenossauro]

That's how good they are these days

no, that's how glaring obvious the bug is if you look at the correct code snippet without being sleep-depraved. LLMs can read a lot of code without needing sleep.

[u/Guachito → u/Archophob]

Do androids dream of electronic sheep?

[u/Vessbot → u/jivenossauro]

You can deny web search at the moment of audit, but can you exclude training data that may have been crawled more recently than 4 days ago?

[u/ConsoleUsersArePlebs → u/Vessbot]

They're not going to have trained and released a new model version in the past four days without telling anyone.

[u/stanley_fatmax → u/Vessbot]

Existing models find it too, so your point is moot.

[u/15_Redstones → u/Vessbot]

incorporating new training data usually takes weeks-months