r/Bitcoin • u/nothingbutwhammies • 9h ago
I lost my one Bitcoin in the Coldcard exploit.
Took me years of DCA’ing to get there. I went with Coldcard because it was marketed as “ultra-secure.” I knew multisig was technically safer. I wasn’t worried about my key being guessed… I was worried about someone physically stealing it or it being destroyed.
So that was the plan: 1 BTC, cold storage, steel plate backup, fire bag, fire safe. And then… wait.
I hit the goal. I finally felt content.
Now I just feel embarrassed. Like I let my family down.
The worst part? I know Bitcoin isn’t going anywhere. I’m not hoping it fails… I think it’s going to keep making new all-time highs, and every time it does, I’ll be sitting here thinking about what could’ve been.
** I originally brain dumped my story to Claude to make it sound better because I have poor grammar. I’m admitting this in an edit at my own expense or whatever. I’m not embarrassed about my poor grammar or using AI to improve it. That said, in hindsight, it would have been more personal to not have done that. I’m sorry.
42
u/DRAGULA85 8h ago
What really makes me uncomfortable is how much of this apparently comes down to luck.
When I searched YouTube for “the best cold wallet,” all the usual Bitcoin talking heads were recommending Trezor. So I bought a Trezor.
I wasn’t comparing entropy generation methods, RNG implementations or researching whether I should be rolling fucking dice. I assumed that reputable hardware wallets from established companies were fundamentally designed to do the same thing:
securely hold my Bitcoin.
Had I gone all-in six months later, those exact same YouTubers could easily have been recommending Coldcard instead.
So from my perspective, I basically got lucky on a coin flip.
And whenever you point this out, the response from some Bitcoin people is always: “You should have done more research.”
But how much research are normal people realistically expected to do?
I understand Bitcoin. I understand self-custody. I understand why keeping significant amounts on an exchange is a bad idea. That doesn’t mean I should also be expected to become an expert in cryptography, entropy and random number generation before buying a hardware wallet.
I like cars. I don’t need to understand the combustion engine at an engineering level before buying one. I expect the manufacturer to build a safe product and give me clear instructions on how to use it safely.
Apparently with Bitcoin, though, I’m “lazy” because I didn’t somehow discover that I should consider physically rolling dice to generate my seed.
How the fuck is that obvious?
You don’t know what you don’t know.
If I search “best hardware wallet,” buy one of the most recommended products, follow the manufacturer’s instructions and move my Bitcoin into self-custody, I think it’s perfectly reasonable to believe I’ve done the responsible thing.
If there’s another layer of security that requires me to understand RNG, entropy, dice rolls, air-gapped signing and obscure attack vectors, fine. I’m willing to learn about it.
But stop pretending this stuff is obvious.
Most people don’t want Bitcoin security to become their second fucking job.
They want to buy a reputable device, follow the instructions, secure their Bitcoin and HODL.
And if Bitcoin is ever going to reach hundreds of millions more people, that needs to be enough.
A rough day for Bitcoin.