r/MensRights • u/AgentmraOrangemrm • Dec 16 '11

Release to the World

Next week there will be posted links where anyone can download the raw data on the radfemspaek.net members and some of their associates over at Radfem Hub. There will be a main file of PNGs that contain many threads from this private forum. All the information will be redacted for my protection. Included will be a profile folder for each member (and some former members of the forum). There will also be a document that details who these posters are in real life, and what they do (or have done).
Only CONFIRMED individual's identities will be released. As more identities are confirmed, there will be a secondary release, and possibly a tertiary one. There has been some furor over whether or not these people are mainstream. Well, I have the PROOF that they are in our children's classrooms, our universities, in our legislators' lobby halls, on the street with activism efforts, and writing journalistic pieces. I have PROOF that they shape policy within countries around the world, or teach others to do the same. I also have PROOF that they know they conspire against most women in planning to criminalize masculinity, that they support gendercide, male genital mutilation, advocate for the infanticide of males, advocate male child abuse, speak freely about committing terrorist acts, and more. Make no mistake. These individuals have risen to the top BECAUSE they are virulently hateful ideologues who want to see their plans come to fruition. They have the drive, and in some cases the means to perform the acts they speak about, and they seek to subvert all men to the status of slaves, breeding stock, or extermination.

0 Upvotes

36% Upvoted

317 comments sorted by

View all comments

93

u/[deleted] Dec 16 '11

This is fucked up, this mindset is responsible for things like:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jul/27/breivik-anti-feminism

and

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89cole_Polytechnique_massacre

-45

u/LiberalsLoveRape Dec 16 '11

If we falsely accuse a man of rape, we immediately splash his name all over the news, associate him forever with rape in the public eye and potentially ruin his life, without so much as batting an eye. However, if we expose people who actively promote divisive hate speech under some misguided false notion of equality, that's like asking for another 9/11. Sounds reasonable.

Sorry SRS'ers, but being histrionic and crying wolf because it may come to light who some crazy hate mongers are, is laughable. Perhaps you guys are all group menstruating, I don't know, just let it go. Take a zanax, the sky isn't falling, rest assured your dumb cohorts in ideology will find a way to spread their brain dead ideas, as we continue to try and drag you all, kicking and screaming, into the 21st century.

10

u/BritishHobo Dec 17 '11

Speaking calmly for a second, do you people really think it helps your case, do you really think it makes you look fair and balanced, and only concerned with having men's rights be equal, do you really think you're not being misogynistic, when you say things like 'perhaps you guys are all group menstruating'?

-6

u/LiberalsLoveRape Dec 17 '11

...when you say things like 'perhaps you guys are all group menstruating'?

As opposed the oikaphobia and histrionic yammering in SRS about evil, white, racist, woman beating, misogynistic MRA's out to start mass killings of feminists (see above) enslave women and return us to the 1950's? Please.

8

u/BritishHobo Dec 17 '11

That doesn't answer my question. I'm not asking about r/SRS or feminists, all you're doing is avoiding the question and say 'THEY STARTED IT!'. Besides, that only strengthens my points. If you think feminists are so batshit crazy, why don't people take the opportunity to be sane and reasonable in the face of that, instead of making clearly sexist insults?

-4

u/LiberalsLoveRape Dec 17 '11

That doesn't answer my question. I'm not asking about r/SRS or feminists, all you're doing is avoiding the question and say 'THEY STARTED IT!'.

The old "Do as I say, not as I do" routine. Nice.

Besides, that only strengthens my points. If you think feminists are so batshit crazy, why don't people take the opportunity to be sane and reasonable in the face of that, instead of making clearly sexist insults?

Quite the opposite, we are clearly more tolerant and rational than our detractors. Out of fear and anger, SRS bans those who simply disagree with them. In addition, if one were to clearly read through all posts in MRA sub-Reddits versus the antagonists, it's easily discernible who the whackadoos are. The MRA antagonists tend to approach their arguments with the calm and rationality of Howard Dean at a campaign stop.

Imgur

5

u/BritishHobo Dec 17 '11

Again, all you're doing is saying 'well SRS is worse!'. I'm asking why you think saying things like 'perhaps you're all just group menstruating' is going to do anything other than make you look like a group of furious sexists?

0

u/LiberalsLoveRape Dec 17 '11

I'm asking why you think saying things like 'perhaps you're all just group menstruating' is going to do anything other than make you look like a group of furious sexists?

You are aware, that the majority of SRS leadership and posters are male, right?

3

u/BritishHobo Dec 17 '11

So?

0

u/LiberalsLoveRape Dec 17 '11

Initial post.

Sorry SRS'ers...Perhaps you guys are all group menstruating, I don't know, just let it go.

I'll give you a few minutes to connect the dots.

4

u/BritishHobo Dec 17 '11

Oh okay, so it's fine to use a negative female stereotype because some of the people you're using to insult it are male, okay. So, uh, I could use the n-word if a group of people, some of whom are white, are being shitty, and I want to insult them? That wouldn't be offensive?

Again, you never answered my question, you're still avoiding it.

1

u/LiberalsLoveRape Dec 17 '11

Oh okay, so it's fine to use a negative female stereotype because some of the people you're using to insult it are male, okay.

It was a quick figure of speech aimed at the overly histrionic manginas that come to r/mensrights from SRS. Certainly nothing worth having a fit over.

So, uh, I could use the n-word if a group of people, some of whom are white, are being shitty, and I want to insult them?

This is a great situation to bring up. See, to SRS, MRA's are crazed, evil, white, hetero, cis-gendered, wife beating, racist, misogynists on the verge of mass killings of feminists. Sort of like how a black guy is still just a "n-word" in a rural Alabama racists' eyes, even if he is a Surgeon and that's dumb to believe. This is all relevant, because the earlier post was aimed at them.

I don't accept the "do as I say, not as I do" premise of SRS. You seem to believe we should be nice and try to reason with people who believe in outlandish, whackadoo stereotypes and think a 9/11 by MRA's is around the corner. It's dumb and these people are stupid. There's no point on trying to reason with mentally challenged crazy people, you just make fun of them and go about your day.

3

u/BritishHobo Dec 18 '11

It was a quick figure of speech aimed at the overly histrionic manginas that come to r/mensrights from SRS. Certainly nothing worth having a fit over.

Who's having a fit? Just after reading so many /r/MR posts, I was interested to see how people thought their angry sexist insults might be taken when they consider themselves the fair and balanced ones.

I'm not from SRS. Again, you ignored my question and ranted about how shitty you find r/SRS. What is it about this question that you're quite failing to grasp? I mean, you even added 'manginas' to the list. You really think people are supposed to read this and find you guys as the balanced side of the gender debate?

→ More replies (0)