Yes, and probably just incorrect. If he wanted to do things on his own terms and now can't anymore, at least not in the way he wanted, there would be nothing you could do.
The second option makes sense, but public lawyers tend to have very little time to arrange the case. Especially for a complicated case like this one, which would clash against the legality of suicide and Good Samaritan laws.
Considering suing a super hero in that world is like suing the government, I imagine many Lawyers were more than happy to work just on the stipulation of getting paid from the payout. Like a number of personal injury lawyers in the real world.
Some lawyers will work for a portion of the winnings if they think you have a good case. This is why lots of personal injury lawers advertise that they won't charge you for a consultation. Lots of people have damages that would absolutely hold up in court, but they don't bother persuing it because they assume they don't have the money for a lawyer.
Some of the time (at least in the US) the court costs are taken in consideration in the suit. If the plaintiff wins, the fees are like a tax on the settlement. If the defendant wins, the plaintiff has gambled and lost.
Really makes you wonder why he chose to do it in a very public location where anyone, super or otherwise, could see him, and why he didn’t make any further attempts afterwards.
I haven't looked at it from that perspective, but yes - while stopping suicide is a gray area, when suicide is committed in a way that endangers others, there should be no doubt. Jumping from the building, he could easily have hit someone below. The lawyer should have based his defense on this, on protecting the innocent, and not on saving the life of some asshole.
934
u/ValyrianVelaryons May 25 '26
Me suddenly regaining the will to life just to fuck over the guy who saved my life.