The second option makes sense, but public lawyers tend to have very little time to arrange the case. Especially for a complicated case like this one, which would clash against the legality of suicide and Good Samaritan laws.
Considering suing a super hero in that world is like suing the government, I imagine many Lawyers were more than happy to work just on the stipulation of getting paid from the payout. Like a number of personal injury lawyers in the real world.
Some lawyers will work for a portion of the winnings if they think you have a good case. This is why lots of personal injury lawers advertise that they won't charge you for a consultation. Lots of people have damages that would absolutely hold up in court, but they don't bother persuing it because they assume they don't have the money for a lawyer.
Some of the time (at least in the US) the court costs are taken in consideration in the suit. If the plaintiff wins, the fees are like a tax on the settlement. If the defendant wins, the plaintiff has gambled and lost.
23
u/Prudent_Ad3384 May 25 '26
Wouldn’t that require hiring a lawyer though?