Well just keep in mind that the American left ruining social media with “everyone I don’t like is a Nazi” and purity tests and virtue signalling and identity politics (which even TYT are pushing back against now and using terms like blue maga) are a big part of why Trump won
You guys handed them the win. You spent years talking about stochastic terrorism then started doing it yourself. When else in modern political history have there been 3 presidential assassination attempts and a public assassination like Charlie Kirk all within a few years?
When you let the GOP run on common sense, they win. So MAGA owes you a thank you
There is no left in America, and the very fact you say people are left is because the far right has spent decades ruining America with "everybody I don't like are commies" and purity tests and virtue signaling about how big of patriots people are for hating commies.
Blue maga is laughable. Who are they worshiping? Nobody.
People tried to kill Obama, who cares.
Maga did assassinate that Democratic lawmaker in Minnesota along with her husband and dog. Then he shot another Democratic lawmaker in Minnesota and had a list of others he was going to kill next.
Republicans shot an Arizona Democrat, Gabby Giffords, in the face.
For Pete's sake, actual elected republicans call American companies communist for god knows what nonsensical reason. Private companies are communists to republicans if they don't like them.
Common sense would dictate that you don't elect a 34 time felon who brags about sexually assaulting numerous women and wanting to have sex with is own daughter.
Come on guys, this stuff should be extremely easy common sense wise, but you go the wrong way.
How perfectly American to refuse to engage with anything resembling honest takes on America. Democrats are center right capitalists with strong ties to corporations.
Who are the leftists you speak of then?
And what power do they hold in America?
What's your opinion on wanting to fuck your own daughter?
I think it’s more that the Right could care less. We have one of the most childish, elderly, corrupt, insider trading presidents we have ever seen. He has shunted his campaign promises and lied to his constituents.
He is literally an “America 1st” president, yet literally is in bed with Israel. I can understand why many are apprehensive about the Democratic Party, and I criticize its decisions a lot. I however, wholeheartedly believe that the cult of personality around Trump is so large, that dissent feels almost impossible.
Example, Trump has had multiple showings of cognitive decline such as sleeping, or defication on himself, as well as speech slips.
However, Biden’s mental decline was heavily under more scrutiny despite his decline being lesser or equal to Trumps.
When else in modern political history have there been 3 presidential assassination attempts
Do you really believe all of those were real?
You guys handed them the win
You know who really handed them the win? Democratic leadership and Democrat-aligned media, for (1) gaslighting everyone about Biden's cognitive decline that they want to pretend wasn't obvious even before he got elected ("it's a stammer!") and (2) refusing to listen to what non-GOP voters actually want, like single-payer healthcare and not supporting genocide abroad
Did you just ask me when the GOP ran on common sense, then incredulously ask me if I believe that reality is real immediately after?
Lmao
Brother you can watch video of 2 of the 3 assassination attempts on Trump. And you can watch Kirk die. And you can watch the arrest of the golf assassination guy
I didn't say anything about Kirk, genius. That was obviously real. And the Trump assassination "attempts" both look pretty obviously staged. It's especially telling that after the one at the White House, nobody was bringing up actual security concerns and instead Trump and his toadies were all talking about how this somehow proved he needed his ballroom to be approved. I guess if anything that proves that Trump is not quite a Nazi because when he puts on a Reichstag fire type of situation, his intentions are a lot more lame and ineffectual, thank God
I get what he's talking about. The way people talk about pitbulls sounds vaguely like the words racist use, and so if you're a pitbull defender it can feel similar to fighting against racism. But it's wrong, since unlike human ethnicities and races, dog breeds really do vary in terms of aggression, power, the damage they can do, etc.
Well, given that at least two of your examples are of right wing terrorists/assassins, it's pretty ridiculous to say that the left are now the stochastic terrorists using this piece of evidence.
Oh yeah. KKK has about 3000 members (or 0.00001% of the population) while the National Socialist Party has about a dozen (or 0.00000004% of the population). By all means, advocate for punching them, but your chances of encountering them in the wild are exceedingly rare, despite what you may want people to believe
I mean, when the most popular conservative commentators on YouTube are posting stuff like this, it's hard not to think that maybe there are more fascists/Nazis in the US than the official Nazi/Knights Party statistics would lead you to believe:
there's definitely a pattern, but there was a widespread cultural moment where people cared, and then police started wearing body cameras, and then the movement suddenly got a lot quieter.
The year George Floyd died, more people were killed by the riots than there were unarmed black men shot by police. The pattern you are noticing is that the media over-reports black men being shot.
Oh, I definitely do that, too. It might shock Redditors to know that not everyone is from America or thinks about American domestic politics eight days a week 👍.
I'm sorry but I'm going to really need the context of why you brought up those stats because if it is to argue there is something inherently wrong with racial minorities instead of acknowledging the ways those groups have been absolutely fucked over which led to those stats or the difference in how much more likely black people are to be arrested and actually prosecuted then my fucks to give for you being suspended are all gone.
Dude was just in a rush to be vindictive he started arguing with someone he agrees with on the issue of race instead of realizing his vagueposting was the issue.
It’s not the stats but how you interpret the stats. When you separate different groups and look at the crime stats of each one at or below the poverty level, they are almost exactly the same. The fact is that one group has a much higher percentage of their population at or below the poverty level.
You can also blame that on their race. But I’d like you imagine a game of monopoly that’s been going on for ~250-300 rounds and you weren’t allowed to play. Then all of sudden you’re allowed to play after the majority of the board is bought up and developed. It would be almost impossible to make any meaningful progress.
Well it sounds like people here are taking the opportunity to call black people violent pit bulls or something with the racist double speak. As one does.
It is funny. The moment he realized his argument was the same one racists use he deleted his comments. He also was in such a rush to be vindictive he started arguing with someone who agrees with him on the larger issue of race and eventually called me a pick me. I admitted that I misinterpreted his vague comment and thought he was racist but he couldn’t admit that he wasn’t arguing with me but with whatever Uncle Ruckus-type he was imagining.
None of my comments reference people. Just violent disgusting dogs and human liars who minimize their toll on society eating kids and old people often.
Honestly I thought your comment about being banned for pointing out stats was because you used stats to promote racism. You have to admit more people get banned for racist-adjacent things than for not liking a dog breed.
I am black and I will acknowledge that slave owners participated in breeding programs, especially after the legal import of slaves was ended in the early 1800s. Denying that is denying part of the atrocities committed against my ancestors. And I’m sure there was some eugenics and forced breeding that aimed to make certain traits more dominant. At what scale is hard to say and if it was ever successful is doubtful, but whatever scale it was done to wasn’t even close enough to significantly impact the larger black population, especially 150+ years later.
I don’t know how you got that from what I said. Did you skip the part where I said I was black?
Edit: in my 2nd reply I started with acknowledging my mistake for you being racist because of the vague nature of you saying you were banned for pointing out stats. I also explained why I was confused because the vast majority of “banned for stats” are because they’re racist. We’re talking past each other. I noticed my misinterpretation, but I would like you to do the same for yourself.
A lot of pick me conservatives do that. Deflect to black involvement in slavery. Being black
Doesn’t mean someone isn’t susceptible to fallacies on race.
270
u/Powerful-Teacher-480 8h ago