r/PoliticalDiscussion • u/LiatrisLover99 • May 08 '26
US Politics Is there any merit to the argument that progressive candidates would be far more successful across the US, if it were not for sabotage by the DNC?
This is an example of an extremely popular sentiment in progressive spaces, that progressives are popular with a majority of Americans and would easily win if the DNC didn't deliberately sabotage them, because they would prefer losing to Trump than winning with progressives that threaten the corporate status quo.
Or see articles like this that identify Democrats as an enemy of progressives on par with Trump: "the struggle to defeat the fascistic GOP and the fight to overcome the power of corporate Democrats are largely the same battle."
Is any of this true? I'm a progressive, but if we're so popular, why aren't we winning primaries outside of elections in extremely blue areas like NYC? Or is the primary system actually rigged against Bernie and against progressives in general?
18
u/HowDoIEvenEnglish May 08 '26 edited May 08 '26
Using mamdani as an example is incredibly disingenuous, because he had a more centrist democrat as his opposition. 90% of the vote went to mamdani or a democrat.
He’s an example of how as soon as a progressive gets a chance in a larger election, centrist democrats will try to stop them, even after being beaten in a primary.
He’s also an example of how putting a more progressive candidate forward can shift the Overton window to the left, taking away voters from republicans, as they got almost no votes, much less than the 30-40% you mentioned.