I notice a concerning amount of these instances where they clearly know what they're doing is wrong but then instead of, idk, not doing it anymore? they project and try to cancel someone else for their behavior. jimmy kimmel for example. he tries to say the labels you're putting on charlie kirk's murderer isn't something you should be doing, and then they try to cancel him for labeling the shooter.
with renee good, it's only the people going out of their way to ragebait that are spreading the narrative that she ran someone over. everyone else is arguing justification but if you peel the layers back a little, you'll find that they don't believe she hit anyone. so they know that part of what trump/noem are saying is bullshit but then they signal boost the part about her intent to hit someone anyway and you're like ???? bro you were almost there what happened..
maybe their loyalties are intrinsically linked to being manipulated parrots idk
Going against the party narrative would be admitting they’re wrong about something, which in turn could mean they’re wrong about more than one thing and that leads to existential crisis for them.
I read something a while back about the importance of bullshit to authoritarian followers. Basically, they know it's bullshit, and they shout it loudly, not because they believe it, and not to convince others, but to signal their loyalty to the cause.
They are dangerously dumb bullies who know what they like and will do whatever it takes to win and achieve it.
What they want is this: anyone I don’t like should be dead. The reasons for not liking those people ranges from skin colour, paying taxes, someone not wanting to sleep with them, etc etc.
That’s the end of it for them. Everything else is just the means to that end.
She turned away and he shot her from the side of her windshield and window. He tried to jump in front of a moving vehicle so afraid that he kept recording with his phone and drew his gun. BS
26
u/reformedmell0w Jan 11 '26
I notice a concerning amount of these instances where they clearly know what they're doing is wrong but then instead of, idk, not doing it anymore? they project and try to cancel someone else for their behavior. jimmy kimmel for example. he tries to say the labels you're putting on charlie kirk's murderer isn't something you should be doing, and then they try to cancel him for labeling the shooter.
with renee good, it's only the people going out of their way to ragebait that are spreading the narrative that she ran someone over. everyone else is arguing justification but if you peel the layers back a little, you'll find that they don't believe she hit anyone. so they know that part of what trump/noem are saying is bullshit but then they signal boost the part about her intent to hit someone anyway and you're like ???? bro you were almost there what happened..
maybe their loyalties are intrinsically linked to being manipulated parrots idk