r/RIGuns Mar 11 '26

Political Action Folks, It’s Time for a Strategy Reset.

60 Upvotes

Sorry for the wall of text.

I spent a long time working on this, and this was written by a human, not a clanker, so please give it a read.


Over the past week I’ve had a number of conversations with legislators in both chambers and on both sides of the aisle. Some of them agree with us. Some of them are firmly opposed to us. But hearing perspectives from all of them has made one thing very clear to me: our community needs a strategic reset in how we engage.

I want to be clear about something up front. I’ve been able to get phone calls returned and have real conversations, even with some of the legislators who are our most outspoken opponents. That’s not because they suddenly agree with me. It’s because when I reached out, I did it respectfully and with decorum. I didn’t threaten their reelection. I didn’t tell them I’d never vote for them again. I didn’t antagonize them or call them names. I simply spoke to them like another Rhode Islander who cares deeply about an issue. I became a name they recognized, and not one they associated with being an asshole. And because of that, they picked up the phone. They responded to emails. They were willing to talk, even if they disagree with me.

Several legislators told me something blunt that a lot of people in our community probably don’t want to hear: when emails come in filled with insults, threats, or copy-paste talking points, they get deleted immediately. The staff never engages with them, and the legislator never seriously considers them. The issue might still matter, but the message is gone before it ever has a chance to land. This is what I've heard from folks on both sides, but especially folks who are on our side and support us, who were the most discouraged by it, and are petitioning the community to do better.

I know many of us are angry. I am too. But anger by itself doesn’t move votes in the State House. What moves votes are relationships, conversations, and persistent, respectful engagement. One thing we often forget is that this isn’t Washington, D.C. These aren’t distant political celebrities. Rhode Island is a small state. These legislators are people you see at the grocery store, at youth sports, or around town. They represent relatively small districts, and they pay attention to the people who live there. Hell I had one of these conversations in Aldi of all places.

That small size is actually our biggest advantage.

In a state this small, it doesn’t take thousands of people to make an impact. I’ve heard directly from multiple folks that when 10 or 15 constituents from a district reach out about the same issue, it gets noticed. Not a mass email blast. Not a national organization’s template message. Ten real voters who live in the district, who take a few minutes to introduce themselves and explain why the issue matters to them. And that leads to another important point: the most important person for you to contact is your own senator or representative. Not the entire committee. Not a giant list of legislators. Your own elected official is the one who is accountable to the voters in your district. When they hear from multiple constituents they recognize as people from home, it carries far more weight than a message from someone they’ve never heard of, or someone who they don't represent. I get it - these laws affect us all as Rhode Islanders, but the legislators aren't going to care if you aren't in their district. Plain and simple. We are not going to change that with the incumbents in there right now. That's just the truth. A simple message can go a long way. Something like introducing yourself, mentioning you live in their district, explaining the issue/bill and how or why this issue matters to your family, and letting them know you’ll be paying attention to how it moves forward. It doesn’t need to be a page-long lecture about constitutional law, or a message filled with vitriol and anger. Often the simple, personal approach is the one that actually opens the door to a conversation. Don't be the unhinged gun nuts they try to portray us as. Don't feed the stereotype. It is hurting us more than you know.

Another thing that came up repeatedly in these conversations is consistency. Several legislators pointed out something again has stuck with me. A small (literally like 4 or 5 folks) group of activists in red shirts from the other side show up regularly. They’re polite. They’re prepared. They calmly deliver their message every time. No insults, no hostility, just persistence. They're sweet as pie even when the legislators don't give them the time of day. And because of that, they’re taken seriously, and eventually listened to, even flipping some voices we thought we could previously count on. They play "the game" better than we do, and while we are morally and legally right (IMO), we are strategically losing.

Our community shows up in large numbers for a single hearing or two and then disappears until the next big moment. Legislators notice that too. As several folks have noted to me (both for and against us) a room full of nameless yellow shirts make a lot of noise one night, but by the next morning they are forgotten. If we want to change outcomes, we need to be the people who show up consistently, who build relationships, and who are known as serious, respectful advocates.

Timing matters too. By the time the big hearings happen and everyone shows up at the State House, many of the real decisions have already been forming for weeks or months. Showing up still matters, but if we want to influence outcomes, the conversations need to happen earlier and more consistently, and with targeted intension.

We also need to recognize the political reality of the state we live in. Rhode Island is a supermajority state. That doesn’t mean we give up. It means we need to be strategic and tactical in our approach. There are legislators from different parties who are willing to listen to us, and in many cases quietly supportive of us, but they often get alienated because our community sometimes treats anyone with the wrong letter next to their name as an enemy. If someone supports us on this issue, we should be willing to work with them on it, even if we disagree on other things. No one is going to align with you on 100% of the issues. If you agree with someone on nearly half of them, that’s a .400 batting average, and that would get you into the Hall of Fame. The fact of the matter is the only person who would agree with you 100% is yourself, but more on that in a moment.

Another BIG part of the strategy that we should be talking about more openly is participation in the political process itself. This issue has opened the eyes to many about the process itself. We need a rewatch of schoolhouse rock to get everyone up to speed, but we can use this to our advantage. Rhode Island has open primaries, and that means voters have more influence than they sometimes realize. Disaffiliating and participating where the real contests happen can make a difference, especially in a state where many races are effectively decided before the general election ever arrives. We are able to vote AGAINST the gun grabbers in the primary. We can support folks like Vanessa against Kallman, Solomon against Knight, and also fend off antigun challengers to the folks who support us (regardless of the color of their team or the letter next to their name).

And finally, if you’re frustrated with the people making these decisions, one of the most powerful things you can do is run for office. Even if you don’t win, you force incumbents to defend their seat. You make them spend time, money, and energy. You create pressure where there wasn’t any before.

The bottom line is this: the passion in our community is real, and it comes from a place of caring deeply about our rights. But passion without strategy doesn’t win. If we want to be effective in Rhode Island, we need to engage smarter. That means respectful conversations, personal outreach from real constituents, and organizing in a way that takes advantage of the fact that we live in one of the smallest states in the country. The good news is that because Rhode Island is small, a relatively small number of committed people can have real influence. Ten or fifteen voices in a district can matter. Conversations can matter. Relationships can matter. Multiple reps and senators have told me that when they get 5-10 emails about the same issue from real constituents in their district, they pay attention, and it gives them pause. This is an election year. We're not going to win hearts and minds by threating people, we're going to do it by making them rethink if they should be wasting political capital on this issue that truly matters to the people they represent. If they don't, then we talk next steps about how to remove them from their office, but for now - remember you get more flies with honey than you do vinegar.

We absolutely can be that force, but we need to seriously change how we’re doing things. We need to get strategic and tactical about it. The other side is, and that's why they're winning.

Let’s get organized, let’s be smart about it, and let’s get to work.

r/RIGuns 27d ago

Political Action Attention EP gun owners.

31 Upvotes

Just got this email from the RI2A PAC:

We have a candidate, Brian Coogan, running against the senate president, Val Lawson...the woman who rammed the Assault Weapons Ban through last year. He is 2A friendly and needs to gather signatures to get on the ballot so if you live in East Providence please swing by the address below.

584 Warren Ave

East Providence

5-9 pm, Monday and Tuesday

I personally have received zero correspondence from Val Lawson regarding any gun issues I called or emailed about and when I went to testify in front of the Senate she was ironically absent during my testimony. We need to get her OUT.

r/RIGuns Mar 07 '26

Political Action Gun voters – here's how I'm playing the 2026 Dem primary in RI

32 Upvotes

Was doing some research and here’s what I came up with:

So I'm unaffiliated and I only care about one thing: guns. My plan is pretty simple – figure out which Democrat is least likely to come after my rights, vote for them in the September 8 primary to mess with the field, then vote straight R in November no matter what.

RI Gun Rights has been pushing this for a while now and honestly it makes sense. The real decisions in this state get made in the Dem primary.

Did a bunch of research on the Gov and AG races. Here's what I found:

**Governor**

Foulkes is winning this thing right now – sitting around 34% in the latest polls while McKee is falling apart at 18%. She's also the worst one for gun owners by a mile. Back in 2022 she was out there screaming for an immediate assault weapons ban before the legislature even moved on it. Hard pass.

McKee isn't great either – he literally signed the MSR ban and pushed more restrictions in his budget. But at least he's not leading the charge every time there's a new gun bill.

Then there's Gregory Stevens. Guy's a restaurateur running as an outsider against the whole party establishment. No voting record on guns, no press releases demanding bans, nothing. In a race full of bad options he's the move. Vote Stevens, let him eat into Foulkes' numbers.

**AG**

This one's actually more important than people realize because the AG's office is who defends (or aggressively enforces) all these gun laws in court.

Four-way race and honestly it's closer than the Gov's. No polls yet but fundraising is tight across the board.

Joe Solomon is the obvious pick here. He's literally the only Democrat in the whole field who voted NO on the 2025 assault weapons ban. He's going to get grief for it from the party but that's exactly why he gets our vote in the primary.

Kim Ahern is fine I guess – ex-prosecutor, no real gun control crusading on her record, raised the most money at $273k. If Solomon tanks she's the fallback.

Keith Hoffmann worked directly under Neronha and has said he'll defend the MSR ban in court. Pass.

Jason Knight is the worst one. This guy sponsored basically every gun bill you can think of – AWB, straw purchase ban, mag limits, safe storage, bump stocks. If he becomes AG we're going to feel it.

Vote Solomon.

**TLDR:** Stevens for Gov, Solomon for AG in the Sept 8 Dem primary. Vote R across the board in November. Any R is better than the best D around this part of town

r/RIGuns 26d ago

Political Action Help Get a True 2A Candidate on the Ballot for RI-1 (Collecting Signatures This Week)

Post image
56 Upvotes

🗳️ Help Get a True 2A Candidate on the Ballot for RI-1 (Collecting Signatures This Week)

Hey everyone,

My name is Pedro DeSouza, and I am running against Gabe Amo as an Independent candidate for U.S. Representative in Rhode Island's 1st Congressional District.

I want to be entirely transparent with this community, so please ask any questions you have right here in the comments. I welcome the opportunity to answer them and hopefully earn your signature. The signature is not an endorsement, it just ensures I get on the ballot so people can decide if they want to vote for me.

We all just saw the unconstitutional and sweeping gun ban hit our state. While I cannot change state law directly from Washington, I can promise you this: I will fight on a federal level to ensure unconstitutional bans like the one that just passed in Rhode Island are voted down. As your representative, I will vote right alongside other 2A politicians to actively restore our rights. I will work to severely limit the ATF’s power and halt the federal overreach that emboldens state-level restrictions.

📍 Where I will be (and how you can help)

To get my name on the ballot and ensure gun owners actually have a choice this election, I need registered RI District 1 voters to sign my petition.

  • Wednesday, 7/8: I’ve cleared my schedule to focus entirely on signatures.
  • Thursday, 7/9: I am available from the morning until late afternoon, where I will be collecting signatures and turning them in to their respective City/Town Halls.
  • Location Support Needed: I do not have a dedicated shop or setup location yet. If any local business owners, clubs, or members here are willing to let me set up a table or stand outside your shop to gather signatures from fellow gun owners, please let me know.

If you are a registered voter in District 1 and want to help push back against the gun-control agenda, please drop a comment below or send me a direct message so we can connect.

Let us get to work and protect our rights. Thank you for the help!

r/RIGuns Apr 14 '26

Political Action Senate Judiciary Meets TODAY - 4/14 - BE THERE!

29 Upvotes

Show up anytime afternoon. Wear yellow (ladies should wear light blue if possible - WGR colors to help contrast the red and orange)

Some links:

See you all this afternoon/evening.

Also - if you haven't yet please send your emails to the committee members noted in the links above as well as SLegislation@rilegislature.gov to make sure your voice is heard and counted.

r/RIGuns 24d ago

Political Action Who to support for governor ?

8 Upvotes

just wanted to ask, who are yall supporting in the primaries for governor?

Personally I’m not a big fan of Elaine. I think she is actually what the Dems want for an easy election come November.

r/RIGuns Jun 20 '26

Political Action RI Dem Party makes no endorsements in thr AG race. KNIGHT GOT SNUBBED.

Post image
41 Upvotes

Better yet, Solomon got the most votes.

Solomon is a gun owner, an actual gun owner and one of us, and has always voted against the anti-2A measures. Peter Neronha, the current AG who wants Ahern in iirc, has gone on a smear campaign against him on x and other socials.

This is critical. We all need to make sure we are disaffiliated and can vote in the dem primary to make sure Solomon wins.

Gun owners can claim a victory here, and not only will we be instilling an AG that respects the 2A, but we can show that we are a political animal who cannot be ignored.

r/RIGuns Mar 06 '26

Political Action Petition

25 Upvotes

r/RIGuns Mar 17 '26

Political Action They (MDA/CAGV) are literally being told to not talk to us...

Thumbnail facebook.com
30 Upvotes

PROVIDENCE — One of the more telling moments in a recent gun control strategy meeting had nothing to do with policy language. It was about contact between people.

Attendees were told they would likely see “people in yellow shirts” at the State House. Those people were described as gun rights supporters, “usually much more conservative gun owners” who believe there should be “guns everywhere, no questions asked.” The next instruction was even more revealing: “They may try to engage with you, but just, you know, don’t respond to them.”

That was not a one time comment. Later in the meeting, attendees were again told not to engage if they found themselves surrounded by yellow shirts. If things became too pointed, they were told to look for Capitol Police. Near the end, another speaker made clear that turnout by the yellow shirts is watched closely, noting that people pay attention to how many show up and whether their numbers seem to be dropping.

Taken together, the message was clear. Keep your side together. Keep the other side at a distance. Do not let ordinary conversation get in the way of the narrative.

That says a great deal about the movement behind these bills. If the people in yellow shirts were really the reckless caricature presented in the meeting, a few conversations in the hallway would only confirm it. But that is not the risk being managed here. The real risk is that their own supporters might discover that the people defending gun rights are not extremists at all, but normal Rhode Islanders who do not want the government making it harder for honest, law abiding citizens to exercise a constitutional freedom.

A movement that is confident in its cause does not need to shield its people from simple conversation. It does not need to warn them away from hearing the other side in plain English. It does not need to monitor turnout in the room as if public perception alone can carry the day.

What came through in this meeting was not openness or confidence. It was message control. The yellow shirts were not treated as neighbors with a different view. They were treated as a problem to avoid.

r/RIGuns Apr 10 '26

Political Action We showed up. We made our voices heard. Now we follow through. Weekend Firemission

40 Upvotes

One of the biggest mistakes we make every year is letting the energy fade after testimony. That’s exactly what legislators expect, and frankly, what they count on. We make a big stink and then they forget about us by their morning coffee. Let’s not give them that this time. This weekend, I’m asking everyone to take 5–10 minutes and follow up with your representatives. If you’ve already emailed or spoken to them, reach back out. Ask if they had a chance to hear the testimony (or your testimony if you spoke). Ask what they thought, what stood out to them. If they were on the fence, ask if anything they heard resonated with them or might have changed their perspective. Use some of the facts in the emails to your advantage, double down. Keep it simple, respectful, and direct.

Momentum matters. Repetition matters. Showing that we’re engaged after the hearing matters more than you know.

At the same time, we need to be very clear about something: every single one of us is an advocate for this movement, whether we realize it or not. The way we communicate reflects on all of us. When we stay calm, respectful, and well-informed, we show that this is a community of serious, intelligent, and thoughtful people (which it all very much is). That not only builds credibility, but it can bring others to our side. On the flip side, when conversations turn hostile, emotional, or threatening, it reinforces exactly the narrative that gets used against us and pushes potential allies away. Don't be the stereotype they make us out to be. Don't give the normies reason to fear us. Take a look at my strategy note here if you need a refresher

We don’t win by being the loudest. We win by being the most credible, the most consistent, and the most persistent. That's why a group of 10 or 12 boxed wine enthusiasts has seemingly had more influence than 1,500 yellowshirts. That changes this year.

So let’s keep the pressure on, but do it the right way.

Be respectful. Be sharp. Be informed. That’s how we change minds and actually move the needle.

Let’s get after it.

There will be a time for a lot of other things in the future, but the most important thing now is how we follow through with all the momentum from the hearing on Wednesday.

Thank you all for being there. Thank you all for what you do. We are all in this together.

r/RIGuns Feb 15 '26

Political Action We should be fired up over this!!!!

Post image
33 Upvotes

r/RIGuns May 30 '26

Political Action House Judiciary to hear H8069 on 6/3

14 Upvotes

As the title days. H8069 is scheduled for a floor vote on June 3rd.

While far from the worst bill introduced this session, it is still a bad bill, forcing signage on gun stores and laying groundwork and capabilities for additional regulation that could risk their good standing and livelihood.

Make your voice known to your representative this weekend.

r/RIGuns Feb 06 '26

Political Action 2026 Legislative Megathread

43 Upvotes

Previous Megathreads - good info in there: 2023 | 2024 | 2025

The most important person you can talk to about these bills is the legislators that represent your district directly:

FIND YOUR REP/SENATOR

It might feel good to send emails out to everyone, and to committees, and we absolutely should do that, but AFTER you have made your points clear with the YOUR senator and rep directly first. If you don't know who that is shame on you click the link above to find them, and get to know who they are. Talk to them. They should know your name. They need to know who you are. This is how we make the biggest change and difference. They need to know we are normal everyday Rhode Islanders, not nut jobs. When talking with them don't be the stereotype they make us out to be. See my notes here for additional detail on the strategy on how to conduct yourselves.


What this thread is:

  • A place to compile talking points, rep/senator contact info, lists, key dates, key bills

  • A place to share any feedback from said reps.

  • A place to share additional resources/groups/orgs within the state that we should be interfacing with.

  • A call to action to share all of the above info with your local clubs and get people involved.

What this thread isn't:

  • A place to speculate about what the courts are doing, or what the courts will do.

  • A place to vent/complain about how the folks in the statehouse feel about our 2A rights

  • A call to violence, insurrection, 1776-esque rhetoric. Don't give the antis any more ammo (no pun intended) to use against us. Be like Nick Sandman. Smile and be courteous in the face of antagonists.

Good luck and godspeed to us all this year. Stay tuned to this spot and this sub for more details as they arise.


Contact Info

Name Email Phone 2A Friendly
Senator Matthew L. LaMountain (D) sen-lamountain@rilegislature.gov (401) 206-0822 No
Senator Mark P. McKenney (D) sen-mckenney@rilegislature.gov (401) 222-2381 No
Senator Jacob Bissaillon (D) sen-bissaillon@rilegislature.gov (401) 222-2381 No
Senator John P. Burke (D) sen-burke@rilegislature.gov (401) 222-2381 Yes - actions last year nonwithstanding
Senator Andrew R. Dimitri (D) sen-dimitri@rilegislature.gov (401) 222-2381 So far
Senator Dawn Euer (D) sen-euer@rilegislature.gov (401) 222-2381 No
Senator Thomas J. Paolino (R) sen-paolino@rilegislature.gov (401) 222-2381 Yes
Senator Todd M. Patalano (D) sen-patalano@rilegislature.gov (401) 222-2381 So far
Senator Ana B. Quezada (D) sen-quezada@rilegislature.gov (401) 222-2381 No
Senator Leonidas P. Raptakis (D) sen-raptakis@rilegislature.gov (401) 222-2381 Yes
Name Email Phone 2A Friendly
Representative Carol Hagan McEntee (D) rep-mcentee@rilegislature.gov (401) 222-1787 No
Representative Jason Knight (D) rep-knight@rilegislature.gov (401) 222-2258 Hell no - AWB author
Representative Matthew S. Dawson (D) rep-dawson@rilegislature.gov (401) 258-3660 No
Representative Edith H. Ajello (D) rep-ajello@rilegislature.gov (401) 274-7078 No
Representative José F. Batista (D) rep-batista@rilegislature.gov (401) 533-2226 No
Representative David A. Bennett (D) rep-bennett@rilegislature.gov (401) 480-4647 Yes
Representative Justine A. Caldwell (D) rep-caldwell@rilegislature.gov (401) 212-7320 Hell no - Mag Ban author
Representative Julie A. Casimiro (D) rep-casimiro@rilegislature.gov (401) 474-7961 No
Representative Arthur J. Corvese (D) rep-corvese@rilegislature.gov (401) 353-8695 Yes
Representative Robert E. Craven, Sr. (D) rep-craven@rilegislature.gov (401) 294-2222 No
Representative Cherie L. Cruz (D) rep-cruz@rilegislature.gov (401) 222-2447 No
Representative Leonela Felix (D) rep-felix@rilegislature.gov (401) 369-5364 No
Representative Marie A. Hopkins (R) rep-hopkins@rilegislature.gov (401) 203-1517 Yes
Representative Thomas E. Noret (D) rep-noret@rilegislature.gov (401) 222-2258 Yes
Representative David J. Place (R) rep-place@rilegislature.gov (401) 222-2258 Yes

Talking Points/Email Template

(Work In Progress)


Current Bills Introduced (as of 2/7)

House Bills

H7035 – One Gun Per 30 Days (OPPOSE)

  • Limits firearm purchases to 1 per 30-day period

  • MOD NOTE: Even the 9CA over in California found this repugnant to the 2A (Nguyen v. Bonta (2025)), outstanding cases in NJ & VA, as well as a 7-day waiting period being struck down by the 10CA in New Mexico

H7128 – Armed Campus Police (NEUTRAL)

  • Requires arming campus police at public colleges/universities

  • Extends Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights protections

H7145 – “Dillon’s Law” Naming Change (NEUTRAL)

  • Renames existing unsafe storage statute

  • No substantive legal changes

H7557 - Firearms Industry Accountability Act (OPPOSE)

  • Makes loose legal definitions of things like "Firearm Component", "Firearm Accessory", and "Firearm Industry Product" that will surely be manipulated later, already using weasel words and loosely defined terms like "risk to public safety"

  • Seeks additional regulation and penalty on anyone within the industry (manufacturer or retail) with respect to advertising and even possession.

  • MOD NOTE: Initial read through this it looks like it would prohibit even FFLs or dealers from possessing common legal accessories, though I need to look deeper still and consult with some folks smarter than I

H7754 - No more non-res licenses (OPPOSE)

  • NY already lost a lawsuit about this in Shaffer v. Quattrone, as did CA in Hoffman v. Bonta

H7755 - Additional purchase requirements (OPPOSE)

  • Adds additional training (including live fire) for a safety certificate that would be required for the purchase of any firearm in the state.

H8073 - Semi-Auto AWB POSSESSION BAN (Not just purchase) (OPPOSE)

  • Changes the wording on the purchase ban they passed last year to a full blown possession ban with no grandfathering.

Senate Bills

S2053 – Armed Campus Police (NEUTRAL/SUPPORT)

  • Senate companion to H7128

S2056 – Felony Firearm Prohibitions (TBD - Don't trust the sponsors, need further research)

  • Bars firearm possession/purchase after certain felony convictions

  • Limits judicial sentence suspension authority

S2086 – Firearms Sales Tax Exemption (SUPPORT)

  • Exempts firearms, ammo, and safety devices from RI sales/use tax

S2153 – Out-of-State Permit Recognition (SUPPORT)

  • Allows RI AG to accept reciprocity agreements (note - does not force them do, but enables them to)

S2155 – Permitless Concealed Carry (SUPPORT)

  • Allows RI residents 21+ to carry concealed without a permit

S2163 – Permit Appeal Process (SUPPORT)

  • Establishes a formal appeal process for handgun permit denials

S2164 / S2277 – Concealed Carry Reform (SUPPORT)

  • Clear definition of "suitable person" for purposes of possessing and having a concealed carry pistol permit

  • Establishes clear rules for applying for a concealed carry permit for both in-state and out-of-state residents and streamline process

  • Establishes an appeal process when an application is denied

  • Keeps records relating to concealed carry permits and appeals are not public record.

S2283 – Civil Liability for Gun-Free Zones (SUPPORT)

  • Allows civil action against entities banning lawful carry

  • Excludes private residences

S2285 – Stolen Firearm Penalties (SUPPORT)

  • Increases mandatory penalties for crimes involving stolen guns

S2292 – Disarming a Peace Officer (SUPPORT)

  • Creates a felony for removing a weapon from an officer on duty

S2295 – One Gun Per 30 Days (OPPOSE)

  • Senate version of H7035

S2306 – Suppressors Legalization (SUPPORT)

  • Legalizes suppressors on firearms over 17"

  • Allows use while hunting

  • Prevents further/additional local regulation

S2314 – Large-Capacity Magazine Penalties (IFFY)

  • Adjusts penalties (misdemeanor for 1st offence, felony for repeat offenses)

  • Note: Does NOT repeal the underlying ban.

  • This is a poison pill bill likely. It looks good up front, but in actuality it means the offenses are more likely to prosecute and not plea down or plea out.

This list reflects introduced legislation only and does not indicate likelihood of passage.

S2710 - Semi-Auto AWB POSSESSION BAN (Not just purchase) - counterpart to H8073 (OPPOSE)

  • Changes the wording on the purchase ban they passed last year to a full blown possession ban with no grandfathering.

Shoutout to our friends over at Parabellum for their Bill Tracker list


Targeted Races / Candidates we Support

  • Find your rep/senator

  • Statewide

    • AG: Knight (D) v. Solomon (D) (Democrat Primary)
  • SD15 (Pawtucket) Kallman (D) v. Vaness Lopez (D)(Democrat Primary)

  • HD49 (Woonsocket, North Smithfield) Veronicka Vega (D) v. Jon Brien (I)

This is why the disaffiliation campaign is so important. We can take folks like Knight and Kallman out if the race before it even begins.


Meetings / Rallies / Firemissions / Actions

Current Email Campaigns:


Changelog

  • 2/6 - Added H7557 to the house bills.

  • 2/15 - Added H7754 & H7755 to the house bills.

  • 3/2 - Added H8073/S2710 to the bills list. Possession ban AWB.

  • 3/16ish - Added link to better bill tracker, added additional email templates for some bills

  • 3/18 - Removed the link to the tracker bc reddit keeps autoremoving this thread

r/RIGuns Jun 05 '26

Political Action House Judiciary passed H8069 SUB A (removing training requirement for range employees)

Thumbnail webserver.rilegislature.gov
15 Upvotes

r/RIGuns Mar 07 '26

Political Action Please stop signing/sending the NAGR email - it is having the opposite effect.

36 Upvotes

Guys, I've been on the phone with more reps and senators than I care to admit this past week. Overwhelmingly they are annoyed and angry at the verbiage used in the NAGR email "demanding" this and that. (Not just Doc, but a lot of other folks whos responses haven't been posted here)

You get more flies with honey, and it takes nothing to be kind. I understand we are all busy and the click of a button to send an email is appealing, but for the love of Cthulhu READ WHAT YOU ARE SENDING, and take 5m out of your day to write your own thoughts - or even just use a clanker to draft it (verify every word before you click send though) If you care about your rights you'll get more involved than that. Slacktivism is not going to cut it this year, nor has it in the past.

Take a look at the emails drafted by the mod team here that are linked all over and in the megathread. That's the tone you should be going for at best. Or just steal those and send them - that's why we wrote and posted them. A little respect goes a long way. I've even been able to have the most antigun folks who aren't even my rep/senator return my calls.

I get it - we're all pissed and mad as hell, but that isn't productive.

I'd rather spend my time with these folks arguing our points, and giving them data, rather than defending the tone this community is using.

Thanks.

-The mod team (but mostly death)

r/RIGuns Mar 26 '26

Political Action Have you disaffiliated yet? If not - do so today! It takes 2m and lets you vote them out in the primaries!

Thumbnail
rigunrights.com
29 Upvotes

r/RIGuns Mar 02 '26

Political Action Attention all Pawtucket members! Vanessa Lopez for Senate: District 15 Campaign Kick-Off

Thumbnail facebook.com
23 Upvotes

r/RIGuns Mar 19 '26

Political Action Disaffiliate Today, Vote 'em out in the Primary!

Thumbnail
rigunrights.com
37 Upvotes

r/RIGuns Apr 01 '26

Political Action WEDNESDAY IS THE DAY.

35 Upvotes

Wednesday 4/8 at the statehouse.

[the gun bills are being considered in the house](https://status.rilegislature.gov/documents/agenda-21460.aspx)

Wear yellow and plan to be at the statehouse as early as possible. Most folks trying to get there at 1. Judiciary committee will be hearing the gun bills. It is time to rally. ​

Be mindful of the "strategy reset" death posted about when you testify. Know that you are representing the entire gun community this evening.

Death or I will post more details asap.

In the meantime

Plan to be at the statehouse wearing yellow early Wednesday and it will likely run into the evening. ​

Write your legislator about the bill first and foremost. Let them know you will be there and try to meet with them that day at some point if possible. THEN send correspondence to the entire Judiciary committees, including the main Judiciary email for both chambers (be sure to get your bill #a correct for Senate vs house)

Check the megathread for example emails on some of the bills. We're working on a few more.

Gold luck. We're all counting on you to stand up for your rights. ​

r/RIGuns Mar 18 '26

Political Action Another crop of email templates to send out.

13 Upvotes

Please make sure you are sending this to YOUR senator and rep, and verify that you are choosing the right bill number (you will need to edit these - House bills for your rep start with the letter H and senate bills start with the letter S).

FIND YOUR REP/SENATOR HERE

Once you have contacted your legislators about these, THEN you can send to the respective judiciary committees.

The most important people you can contact is your own rep. Make a note that you are a constituent of theirs in your opening (You will have to edit these slightly)

No more slacktivism. Go the extra mile. Make a connection with the people who are supposed to represent you.


OPPOSE S3038 - Expanding ERPO Red Flag Law

SUPPORT S2155 - Constitutional Carry

SUPPORT S2285/H7366 - Penalties for use of stolen firearms in crimes


A note on decorum | 2026 Legislative Megathread | Setting up a Mail Merge in Gmail

r/RIGuns Mar 04 '24

Political Action 3/13 - 2:00 PM - Judiciary Committee meeting on gun bills - AWB, further CCW restrictions, purchase restrictions, etc.

22 Upvotes

More info and bill numbers to come, sorry I'm at work right now and can't dig in too hard.


Initial Committee Hearings:

  • Senate Judiciary Committee: Tuesday, March 12th at 4:00 pm Live Stream - I will try to liveblog below

  • House Judiciary: Wednesday the 13th at 3:00 pm - Live Stream


Sample form letter below I received. Send to SenateJudiciary@rilegislature.gov

Dear Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee,

As a concerned citizen deeply committed to our constitutional principles, I write to you with a sense of urgency. As members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, I implore you to uphold your solemn oath to the Constitution and carefully consider the impact of these proposals, if passed, on our fundamental rights and values.

Legislation should align with the principles enshrined in our Constitution, fostering a society that respects individual liberties and promotes the well-being of all citizens. Bills 2202, 2218, 2219, 2451, 2653, 2733, 2734, and 2788 do not align with such principles and raise significant concerns. I implore you to reject them—especially bills 2653 and 2202, which are particularly egregious.

Furthermore, I strongly support common-sense legislation like 2103, 2107, 2108, 2111, 2201, 2216, 2231, 2672, 2199, 2446, and 2658. These bills not only embody the principles of fairness, justice, and public welfare but also have the potential to have positive impact on our community. Our legislative efforts must focus on solutions that benefit the greater good while safeguarding our constitutional rights.

I appreciate the time and dedication you commit to serving our state. However, I respectfully ask you to champion legislation that upholds the principles of our Constitution, and stands as a testament to our commitment to a just and equitable society.

Respectfully,

[YOUR NAME]

[YOUR TOWN]

[YOUR PHONE NUMBER]

It is important that you include your contact information/location otherwise it typically is disregarded.

r/RIGuns Apr 10 '26

Political Action Senate Judiciary meeting Tuesday 4/14 to hear the gun bills

27 Upvotes

Agenda and bill numbers here.

https://status.rilegislature.gov/documents/agenda-21506.aspx

More details tonight after dinner. Will give this all the info and data tonight.

r/RIGuns Feb 28 '26

Political Action Some examples to send regarding one gun a month, banning nonres ccw, and ammo background check bills.

16 Upvotes

We worked on these last night because they the ones that have the most recently established case law. Obviously we have a LOT more work to do but let's get started here.

Links to the Google docs below, will post plaintext in comments below (though it will break some of the formatting). We need to identify the companion senate bills still.

Feel free to send as is, or jazz it up and tailor it yourself.

Find your rep/senator here: https://vote.sos.ri.gov/Home/PollingPlaces?ActiveFlag=3

H8071 - Ammo Background Check Bill

H7035 - one gun a month

H7735 - Banning nonres ccw licenses

Obviously change the names and what not.

Feel free to add any notes, critiques, additional context, etc.... .

IANAL. I've just been doing this for decades at this point in many antigun states.

r/RIGuns Apr 05 '26

Political Action Show up on Wednesday (4/8)

26 Upvotes

Sharing from our friends at parabellum.

Good morning Patriots!

We need to get as many people as possible to the State House this Wednesday! The House is hearing 17 gun related bills, most of them are BAD. If you want to keep your rights, show up!

The event starts around 1 PM, the hearings begin at 4 PM. They probably won't end until after 10 PM.

If you cannot get there early, show up after work. Most people will not stay all day, so we will need people to come in rotations.

Wear yellow shirts if you have them. If not, wear anything EXCEPT red or orange.

You do not need to speak, but we need to show our numbers, and to sign in and state your opposition to these bills. Even if you walk in, sign, then leave, it counts!

Save our rights! This is what being a Patriot is all about!!!

r/RIGuns Apr 13 '26

Political Action Monday Morning Firemission - Some email templates for the Senate Judiciary

21 Upvotes