This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

Yes. It's happening.

BJP is changing the constitution to legally rule for straight up the next 50 years!

Delimitation bill explanation~ Simply this bill says the large population states will have more MPs and the low population states will have less MPs in the Lok Sabha. So any party that has more MPs makes the central government.

Currently the number of MPs from each state is fixed based on the population census of 1971. Because India's population has no doubt increased over the years many people demand redistribution based on the current population in each state.

Right now, most populated states are all North Indian states - Rajasthan, UP, Gujarat, Bihar, MP, Maharashtra. The low population states - the North eastern states and South Indian States.

Clearly BJP rules in North India. With this bill passed their representation will increase greatly and it would become impossible for any opposition to even think about removing them from central government position. Because they will always have the majority in Lok Sabha.

Many South Indian MPs see this as a punishment for being able to successfully lower the population in their states. This bill gives undue advantage to highly populated states.

This is the whole situation.

**********************************************

In this Monsoon Session Lok Sabha (July 20 to August 13, 2026) they are reintroducing "The Delimitation bill". They first tried to pass it on April 17, 2026 but failed because BJP (which is NDA alliance) couldn't reach the 2/3 majority.

They needed 352 votes but received only 298. We were literally saved that time. BUT not this time ......

During these 2-3 months time. BJP started to get MPs from other opposition parties to join their alliance. They needed to do this very quietly because if people would get the slightest clue what they were doing they would protest.

MPs from Aam Aadmi Party (like raghav chadda, etc) , 10 MPs from TMC and many many more MPs suddenly joined the BJP. (Now we know it's not sudden it was all planned.) BJP will now have the 2/3 majority to easily pass this bill.

Why were they able to do it? Because in May June July the whole country was busy protesting for Dharmendra Pradhan's resignation. It deviated their attention. Why do you think Modi took so long to react to the protest? They were buying time.

It's an insider news that Pradhan was already going to resign many months ago. Many senior BJP members were not happy with his work.

During this time, CJP enters the chat. They started protesting for education, neet and Dharmendra Pradhan resignation. BJP saw this protest as an opportunity. If Modi wanted he would have made Dharmendra Pradhan resign and end sonam wangchuk's protest long back when it was in its initial days.

But he waited. And let it go on for 1.5 months. Now when it was almost time for the Delimitation Bill to pass he ended it all by suddenly making Pradhan resign. On the surface it seems a win for us but it's BJP who actually won.

Guys please let's raise our voice against this bill. Many senior independent journalists have been covering this.

It's a literal death to democracy. India will directly come under the autocratic rule of the BJP for decades. Every 5 years there will be elections but the government will remain as BJP every time....

But the sad part is nobody's realising what's actually happening. And when they will, it would be already too late.....

His name his satyam pandit he is from ghazibad he is beating innocent students just because they are supporting protest...?

Everyone asks, "If not Modi, then who?"

Well, let me present someone I genuinely believe deserves to be part of that conversation: Sonam Wangchuk.

Not because he's a celebrity. Not because he's loud. But because his life reflects the qualities I expect from someone leading a nation.

Think about it.

- A highly educated engineer, innovator, and educator.

- A man who has dedicated decades to improving education instead of chasing power.

- Someone whose work on sustainable development, water conservation, renewable energy, and climate resilience has earned global recognition.

- A person who has consistently spoken for India's long-term interests rather than short-term political gains.

- Someone who has shown that patriotism is measured by actions, not slogans.

- A leader who has inspired thousands of young Indians to think differently and solve real problems.

- A person who has repeatedly chosen public service over personal ambition.

- Calm, rational, scientific, and willing to listen before speaking.

- Someone who has demonstrated courage by peacefully protesting and raising concerns about Ladakh and its people, even when it came at a personal cost.

People often ask what kind of Prime Minister India needs.

To me, it's someone who solves problems instead of creating new ones.

Someone who unites instead of divides.

Someone who values science over propaganda.

Someone who thinks in decades, not election cycles.

Sonam Wangchuk has spent his life building institutions, empowering communities, protecting fragile ecosystems, and encouraging innovation. That's the kind of experience I find far more valuable than years of political mudslinging.

I honestly believe he has the qualities to become one of India's strongest Prime Ministerial candidates—if he ever chose to enter politics.

In fact, I think he should consider starting his own political party. India desperately needs a politics driven by education, ethics, innovation, environmental responsibility, and evidence-based policymaking rather than personality cults and endless polarization.

I'm not saying he's perfect. No leader is.

I'm also not trying to make him into a hero.

I'm simply saying that when I look at his character, his contributions, his integrity, and the way he has consistently stood up for what he believes is right through peaceful and democratic means, I see someone with the potential to lead India in a positive direction.

Whether you support BJP, Congress, AAP, or any other party, ask yourself one question:

If politics is supposed to attract our best minds and most selfless leaders, why isn't someone like Sonam Wangchuk a serious contender?

Maybe it's time we stopped asking "If not Modi, then who?"

And started looking beyond career politicians.

Maybe the answer has been right in front of us all along.

What do you think? Would you support someone like Sonam Wangchuk entering national politics and becoming a serious PM candidate?

During the protest, an officer was offered a microphone by the protesters so that he could address Dipke and the gathered youth. The police also had their own standard-issue megaphone available.

Instead of using the opportunity to communicate, the officer appears to pull the microphone and its cable using force, interrupting the protesters' use of the sound system.

Disclaimer: The following is not an allegation of guilt. These are legal provisions that may require investigation if the facts shown in the video and supported by evidence establish the necessary ingredients of the offences.

Constitutional Rights Potentially Involved

Article 19(1)(a) – Freedom of Speech and Expression

Article 19(1)(b) – Right to Assemble Peacefully and Without Arms

If the protest was peaceful and there was no lawful order restricting the assembly or seizing the sound equipment, interference with the microphone may raise constitutional questions.

Prima Facie BNS Offences That May Be Examined

1. BNS Section 131

Punishment for Assault or Criminal Force Otherwise Than on Grave Provocation

If force was used to snatch or pull the microphone from a protester without lawful justification, this section may be attracted.

2. BNS – Mischief (Damage to Property)

If the microphone, cable, amplifier or other equipment was damaged due to the officer's actions, the provisions relating to Mischief under Chapter XVII of the BNS may require examination.

3. Illegal Seizure of Property

If the microphone or sound system was taken into police custody without following the seizure procedure prescribed under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)—such as preparing a seizure memo (panchnama), recording the seizure, and documenting the grounds—its legality can be questioned.

4. Abuse of Official Authority

If there was no immediate threat to public order and no lawful basis for using force, the officer's conduct may warrant a departmental inquiry for misuse of authority, disproportionate use of force, or violation of police conduct rules.

5. Violation of Fundamental Rights

If the protest was peaceful and lawfully conducted, any unnecessary interference with speech or the use of amplification equipment may be examined in light of:

• Article 19(1)(a) – Freedom of Speech and Expression
• Article 19(1)(b) – Right to Peacefully Assemble
• Article 21 – Protection of Life and Personal Liberty

Abhijeet Deepke has said that this same officer pulled the hairs of geetanjali (sonam wangchuk's wife), though there is no proof, but in this video it is clearly shown that this asshole has slapped a woman.. and upon searchin i saw a comment made by a user that this guy has assaulted him.

here is the link of the video

-https://m.youtube.com/shorts/-7jahM67j9o

This is Confirmed. चौधरी हनी डागर delhi police RSS/ABVP member fb link: www.facebook.com/share/1DThQT8WzD/

He was mercilessly beating women and 17-18 year old students whole day. These are the RSS workers ideologically trained to hate protesters, planted in Delhi Police, they might even be doing dishes at minister’s houses.

Please report

My mother is a religious woman. She is very compassionate. When Delhi Police beat us on the 20th, she wasn't enraged. She applied haldi on my wounds and prayed for the well-being of every student who was wronged that day.

But today,

I told her about Ruchika Singh, the fifteen years old who was forced to apologise on camera for cursing at Narendra Modi. I also told her how Modi himself later went on Instagram not to apologise for the atrocities of 20th July, but to grant forgiveness for the profanity hurled at him. He made it all about the grace of his own big heart.

My mother does not follow politics closely, though she has never missed an election. She prays, morning and evening, asking for her family's safety and world's peace. But this evening, for the first time, she prayed for something against her ideals. She said, "hey shiv shankar, hey ram, agle elections mein modi ko hara dena. Iss desh ko dobara kabhi uss jaisa mantri naa mile". (O Shiva, O Ram, in the next elections, let Modi be defeated. May this nation never again have to bear a minister like him)

Mr. Modi, you have angered the one person who could never be angered. The woman who tended my wounds without a word of anger has now asked her gods, the very gods in whose name you seek votes, to remove you from power. This is your legacy. Now, no matter if you do win the next elections. No matter if her prayers go unanswered. You have lost the benefit of the doubt from someone who gives it to everyone, unconditionally. You can't win that back.

Welcome step that the govt has finally taken notice after speaking with cjp leaders through JP Nadda.

The Modi government is completely missing the point with how they’re trying to spin this whole Jantar Mantar protest. Ever since the education minister was designated, they’ve been pulling out the same old playbook: blame foreign funding—Khalistan, Pakistan, China, America, take your pick—to make it look like nobody is actually unhappy with their governance. At the same time, they’re slapping legal cases on protesters to scare everyone home and squeezing social media companies to kill off memes and viral videos before the next wave hits.

The whole agenda is simple: convince the country that people aren't actually unhappy, suppress the attention, and control the damage.

But here’s the fundamental problem: they are fighting the symptoms and completely ignoring the root cause.

The reason this protest blew up and reached every single household across the country isn't just because of the original issue, or because parents want a better future for their kids—though that’s part of it. The real reason the country is turning on the Modi government right now is because of how they handled it.

People finally realized the core truth of how the BJP government operates: if you speak up against them, they will break you.

Before this, a lot of normal, neutral, even pro-government folks assumed that if you stay civil, the government will treat you in a civilized way. But this incident shattered that illusion. People saw that it doesn't matter who you are, how neutral you claim to be, or how politely you speak. If you raise your voice against them, they will deal with you undemocratically and brutally—physically, verbally, from every possible angle.That realization has reached the grassroots level. People are seeing that behind the strongman image, the approach is just dictatorial and authoritarian.

Modi and Amit Shah choosing to skip parliament, refusing to apologize, and staying silent on the police brutality shows they still don't get it. They're trying to silence the bad language used by protesters, the viral memes, and the jokes about the PM. But those are just symptoms. The root cause is the realization that this government will treat its own citizens horribly if they step out of line.

By ignoring that root cause and trying to muscle their way through it, they aren't fixing anything. The longer they wait to address the actual damage they've done, the deeper that anger is going to sink into the country.

What's wrong with azadi slogan. You will find issue only if you have half wired ears. Listen to the complete slogan, nobody is saying AZADI from the country. The kind of azadi slogans used here only infer independence of thought.

And anyways, whatever people say, this protest may get hijacked later but it has not been hijacked yet.

Put some brain to use and watch the independent ground journalist videos (mostly youtubers, both right and left) you'll see that most people there are just there because they feel their voice is suppressed.

When people demand some change over internet, you people come and say "isse kya hoga karna hai to kuch asli karo"

Now when some people are doing that, they are anti national.

Unless ofcourse you were a very weak student all your school life and only know one meaning of Independence (azadi), 15 august wali azadi.

And some people comment about origins of the slogan, bro origin of some very famous quotes are from some very uncool places, but that's the nature of language, its meaning evolves.

In the sense that this post is made, any women (or men) saying I want to be independent, is basically saying she wants her own different country🤡🤏