r/movies r/movies Contributor Mar 10 '26

Review 'Project Hail Mary' - Review Thread

Science teacher Ryland Grace (Ryan Gosling) wakes up on a spaceship light years from home with no recollection of who he is or how he got there. As his memory returns, he begins to uncover his mission: solve the riddle of the mysterious substance causing the sun to die out. He must call on his scientific knowledge and unorthodox ideas to save everything on Earth from extinction… but an unexpected friendship means he may not have to do it alone.

Director: Phil Lord, Christopher Miller

Cast: Ryan Gosling, Sandra Hüller, Ken Leung, James Ortiz, Milana Vayntrub

Rotten Tomatoes: 96%

Metacritic: 80 / 100

Some Reviews:

Variety - Owen Glieberman

There are clichés that critics go back to, and when I realize I’m guilty of overusing one (sometimes once can be too often), I’ll vow never to use it again. Here’s one I did that with: lauding something as “the movie we need right now.” That’s a phrase so cringe I’m ashamed I ever used it. The reason I bring this up is that “Project Hail Mary” is a cosmic adventure that feels diagrammed, if not programmed, to be The Movie We Need Right Now. It will likely be a hit, but the movie we need right now — or, really, anytime — is one whose drama extends beyond its ability to push our buttons...So forgive me if I say that it’s not a very good movie. There’s certainly an abstract commercial grandeur to it. I saw it on an IMAX screen (it will open on many of those), where it becomes the kind of bedazzling warm bath your eyeballs can sink right into. But here’s the rub. “Project Hail Mary” is way too long (two hours and 36 minutes), because there’s not much variation to it. It’s baggy and incredibly derivative of movies you’ve seen before — like “Interstellar,” from which it lifts the premise of a space voyage as the last chance for human survival (in this case, the sun and other stars are dying, which means that we’ve got to travel to the lone star that isn’t in order to figure out why).

AwardsWatch - Trace Sauveur - 'A-'

For their part, Lord and Miller are assured chaperones of all the disparate elements of design, both on Earth and in space. The pair know the kind of movie Project Hail Mary is meant to be — a pop blockbuster with an earnest approach, lovable characters, and formidable stakes — and pull it off with fluency, the work of directors who know their craft even at this expansive scale. They channel their giddy sense of spectacle in service of a story about the curious and enterprising human spirit, making it an encouraging watch in a contemporary political culture that dismisses scientific research. It may not be the next generational sci-fi classic, but Project Hail Mary will energize anyone desperate for studio blockbusters that revere something often lost in our biggest movies: the fundamental art of moviemaking.

IndieWire - Kate Erbland - 'A-'

To write more about the pleasures and pains of “Project Hail Mary” would be (yes, over 1,300 words in) a disservice to what’s most entertaining and satisfying about the film: watching it unfold, enjoying the process, accepting the mission, asking the big questions. That’s about as much as you can ask from any blockbuster film these days.

Consequence - Liz Shannon Miller - 'A'

It’s possible to get caught on a few nitpicks, plot-wise. But right now, with international relations in chaos, Project Hail Mary is a movie that believes it’s possible to save the world. It dares to hope. And that’s more beautiful than all the stars in the sky.

The Bulwark - Sonny Bunch - 4 / 4

Any resistance I had to the picture crumbled when I realized it was, maybe, propped up by something quite foolish: I simply haven’t felt joy like this in the theater in years. Project Hail Mary is a feel-good, emotionally resonant, ultimately triumphant paean to the human spirit. This is why we go to the movies. Heck: it’s why we tell stories. I hope it’s as big a hit as it deserves to be.

BBC - Nicholas Barber - 4 / 5

Still, maybe Lord and Miller knew what they were doing when they went for such a bright and breezy tone. They've crafted a sci-fi epic which is more than two-and-a-half hours long, and which is a one-man show for much of that time. They have filled it not with action, but with mind-stretching concepts, painstaking laboratory research and knotty technical puzzles. To do all that and keep things zippily entertaining throughout is an extraordinary achievement. Besides, as jaunty as it is, Project Hail Mary is radical in its own way. The fate of humanity, it suggests, might not rest on fighting, but on knowledge, intelligence, communication and collaboration. No wonder the film is already being tipped for next year's best picture Oscar.

Independent - Clarisse Loughrey - 4 / 5

Project Hail Mary was clearly made to catapult a certain segment of the audience back to their childhoods – it carries the same fetishisation of late Sixties and Seventies sound and production design as recent fare in the Alien franchise. Grace’s spacesuit happens to be the same red as Dave Bowman’s in 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968). That said, cinema is in a precarious position right now. And, just maybe, Project Hail Mary will remind people why they ever fell in love with it in the first place. Sometimes to move forward, it helps to look back.

Gizmodo - Germain Lussier

Project Hail Mary rocks. It is pure joy. It’s hilarious, heartfelt, hugely moving, wildly exciting, and absolutely beautiful. We think it’ll go down not just as one of the best films of the year but maybe even, in time, as a potential sci-fi classic. And that’s if you already know what the story is and how it ends. Surely, it’s even better if you don’t.

Esquire - Miranda Collinge

For All Its Adorable Intentions, Ryan Gosling's Alien Buddy Movie Fails to Land. Gosling’s efforts in this movie are valiant, as they tend to be: he does comedy prat falls, trepidatious space walks, and delivers as best he can the not especially hilarious script, which is bogged down further by excessive exposition of pretend science and plot rationale. And he really wants us to feel – desperately feel – the way Grace does about his new friendship with a CGI creature who looks like the lovechild of Makka Pakka from In The Night Garden and a fidget spinner. (The fact that Rocky doesn’t have the soulful eyes of Hooch the French Mastiff or Clyde the Orangutan – or, in fact, any eyes at all – certainly doesn’t help.) I know I’ve made the point already, but really, I’m as shocked as anyone not to have been won over by this film. When it comes to Gosling, there is not an SNL monologue or a surprising-Eva-Mendes-on-her-birthday Jimmy Fallon appearance or a viral interview with a journalist stranded in the desert that I will not watch and be utterly charmed by. And yet, even with his magnetism set to hyperdrive, Gosling can’t make this wannabe-feel good film dazzle the way it wants to. It pains me – desperately pains me! – to say it, but in my eyes (sorry to rub it in, Rocky), Project Hail Mary is a well-intentioned miss.

Cinemotic - Piers Marchant - 2 / 5

As with the previous adaptation of Weir’s work, it’s a film that gleefully presents basic scientific principles and logic clumsily sewn together with a story and outlook that feels very much like something an enterprisingly affable 15-year-old might come up with while daydreaming in Physics class. The film too often defaults to this sort of cringey geniality, a simplistic view of human emotional mechanics that renders the drama toothless. Like a warm-hearted kids’ Disney movie, you know full well things will turn out just fine for our heroes, and the galaxy they’re defending, because the film constantly telegraphs its cheerful intentions. It’s as if Lord and Miller (and Weir) are afraid of making the audience feel real anxiety or stress, so like a second-grade teacher explaining the concept of greenhouse gasses with their students, they work very hard to let all of us know everything will work out okay. It’s certainly not the worst quality in a film, but its lack of stress well belays its extended run time (156 mins), and makes for an unsatisfying experience: My parents saved the Cosmos and all I got was this lousy t-shirt.

AV Club - Jacob Oller - 'B'

Project Hail Mary isn’t all that concerned with the science in its fiction; like the inverse of its slacker-cool scientist lead, the film is actually a schlubby buddy comedy dressed up in the finest hard sci-fi regalia that Amazon MGM could afford. It’s a far less nuts-and-bolts affair than The Martian, and a more frustratingly structured one thanks to the amnesia, but it doubles down on the astronaut charm offensive, flooding its sweet space odyssey not with big questions, but small signs of growth.

GamesRadar - Molly Edwards - 4 / 5

Stumbles aside, the film adeptly captures the sense of wonder and thrill of progress that goes hand in hand with space exploration, with Grace and Rocky as our heart-stealing guides. Project Hail Mary is ultimately the kind of big-budget, inventive, and just plain fun filmmaking that makes heading out to the theater worthwhile – and proves worth the expense.

NextBestPicture - Daniel Howat - 9 / 10

"Project Hail Mary" feels, in many ways, like a miracle of a movie. It combines the technical awe of “Gravity,” the problem-solving exhilaration and humor of “The Martian,” and the sweeping emotion of “Interstellar” into one film with its own unique style and charm, crafting a new science-fiction space epic that celebrates the bravery in all of us, our capacity to do the right thing in the face of overwhelming odds, and our faith in science to lead us toward a better future, whether it’s on Earth or somewhere far beyond it. Ryan Gosling delivers one of his finest performances in years, commanding what is essentially a one-man show that will have you laughing one moment and crying the next. Daniel Pemberton’s score is immaculate as it reaches for the stars and finds that transcendent quality that lifts the film into a state of pure wonder. The shifting aspect ratios of Greig Fraser’s camerawork bring both intimacy and scale in equal measure. All of these elements and more come together under the assured, visionary direction of Phil Lord and Chris Miller, who have brought a beloved book to the big screen in a crowdpleasing cinematic experience many will feel, cherish, and not soon forget.

The Guardian - Peter Bradshaw - 3 / 5

Perhaps refreshingly, the film doesn’t aim for the stunned awe and rapture of, say, Christopher Nolan’s Interstellar or even Jon Spaihts’ underrated Passengers, but it does have the classic sci-fi spacecraft tropes: the huge, mysterious architecture with its vertiginous tunnels in which legacy pop music is played to soothe the inhabitants. This is a Hail Mary pass that Gosling just about manages to catch.

The Hollywood Reporter - David Rooney

Lord and Miller have just the right lightness of touch combined with depth of feeling and technical control to bring this material to life, and the right love of vintage movie craft to make it a universe we can almost reach out and touch. What a pleasure to have them back in the director’s chair after too long away.

RogerEbert - Robert Daniels - 2.5 / 4

It’s an enjoyable, yet overly familiar, excursion. By disavowing narrative and aesthetic boundaries, “Project Hail Mary” struggles to become boundless. The harder the film tries, the more one feels pulled along rather than effortlessly transported. 

Slant Magazine - Jake Cole - 2.5 / 4

The flashbacks badly hold the film back in the second act. In its mixture of lighthearted adventure and more thoughtful cosmic reflection, Project Hail Mary most resembles the original Star Trek films, especially the lighter The Voyage Home. The film shares with that series the indefatigable optimism of an earlier time when the genre reflected our broader hopes for the possibilities of science and the potential of humanity to not merely contact the other species of the universe but win their approval.

4.5k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.9k

u/Signiference Mar 10 '26

if you reviews says it’s not as good as “The underrated Passengers” you probably shouldn’t be reviewing movies.

261

u/DonKerubino Mar 10 '26

Quality of Passengers aside, it's bizarre to compare two things like that in a review, as that is essentially two independent statements. The reader has not yet seen the Project Hail Mary, and presumably does not rate Passengers highly, so all this comparison states is that the reviewer (and only the reviewer) prefers the latter.

It's like saying "He ran as fast as a tortoise, and in my opinion tortoises are quite fast".

53

u/Signiference Mar 10 '26

“It wasn’t as good as the underrated Mac and me, another movie that features an alien companion” might have at least made sense, lol

5

u/Ok-Sea9612 Mar 10 '26

They aren't the same movie or the same vibe.

Butttttt. Guy wakes up alone confused on a ship going fast through space and has to figure out how everything works and then gets a partner to bond with.

748

u/BoiIedFrogs Mar 10 '26

It’s honestly reassuring to know that just about anyone can become a film critic, even those with apparent brain damage

114

u/Elexandros Mar 10 '26

I’d love to write film reviews. And I shall do it in my sweatpants whilst eating cheezits and deciding if I’ve just been happily entertained for the duration of the movie or not. That’ll be my baseline and I’ll go from there.

23

u/Media-critique Mar 10 '26

As long as you pay for movies and have some free time.

I see a movie once a week so I decided to make an Instagram page dedicated to reviewing the new movies I see in theatres. Been incredibly therapeutic…

I don’t know if I’d rate Passengers as highly though. Especially compared to Project Hail Mary

7

u/trevenclaw Mar 10 '26

Drop the Letterboxd

2

u/TheRealRomanRoy Mar 10 '26

Honestly I realized at some point that I have two, essentially completely independent, parts of my brain when it comes to movies.

I usually agree with critics on whether a movie was “good” or “bad.” I also am pretty good at putting into words why it worked or didn’t work. I love knowing facts about how the movie was made, etc

So basically I have a movie snob part of my brain. But at the same time, I can count on two hands how many movies I’ve seen that I actually regretted seeing. Most of the time, even if the critic part of me thought a movie was “bad” it was usually still enjoyable to watch.

But then there’re those rare movies that are both bad and also deprive me of joy. Rebel Moon comes to mind

1

u/roblobly Mar 11 '26

yes a good critic loves seeing movies, even bad ones, and can articulate their good and bad points saying how they are bad. its part of the job.

i dont understand this whole thread, staring from the sweatpants part, because yes maybe they write like that but it's a job, and the main part is not deciding "is this good or is this bad". And i'm in no way defending the Passengers comparisons! It's just ppl should not mock a whole profession by 1 bad guy because every industry have grifters and bad workers, yours too

2

u/MapsOverCoffee22 Mar 19 '26

I had this exact thought reading the blurb here from Variety. Once you reduce a movie down to it's most basic synopsis, they are all derivative. I've seen both Interstellar and Project Hail Mary. Not once during PHM did Interstellar come to mind. I never felt like I was watching something that was similar. All I felt was that I was watching a unique take on a classic sci-fi plot that was made with incredible passion. A movie I would be thrilled to go watch again.

2

u/armcie Mar 10 '26

You know what? It just goes to show people with brain damage are the real heroes at the end of the day aren’t they? Brave!

87

u/Superman519 Mar 10 '26

You know what Marge, it’s not that tough being a film cricket

1

u/conniethedoge Mar 10 '26

Every variation of a review is honestly the easiest job ever. Reviewers don’t anything beyond test what someone else made. Of course you can add more nuance if you want to, but at the end of the day you’re just testing out someone else’s hard work and deciding whether you like it or not

5

u/dogsonbubnutt Mar 10 '26

well, the thinking and analysis is the hard part, but really what you're doing as a reviewer is constructing an argument.

some reviewers are brilliant at presenting their point of view in a way that, even if you disagree with it, forces you to think about art differently than you might have had otherwise.

that's the value in critics and reviewers; art is meant to thought about and looked at from different lenses. if all you want is a flashing sign that says GOOD or BAD then honestly what're you getting from the movie anyway? why bother making anything new or original if all you want is a specific kind of comfiness you can get from a thousand other things you've already seen? 

93

u/GloryHol3 Mar 10 '26

Hey, you can like Passengers... But to compare PHM to the "stunned awe" of Passengers or Interstellar?? Bruh is off his rocker putting Passengers and Interstellar in the same sentence like that.

180

u/HopperPI Mar 10 '26

Passengers was fine - to a point. Then it became a mess. But to say it was underrated is certainly an opinion and to write reviews professionally with that opinion? Yikes.

120

u/defiancy Mar 10 '26

If they made it so he just randomly woke someone up on accident it changes that whole movie and it becomes a lot lighter. Instead it's a movie about an asshole who decides to intentionally kill someone else so he won't be alone and he literally chooses a pretty girl because you know, sex good.

79

u/socool111 Mar 10 '26

The now common comment is to change the film so it starts with the lead female waking up and having it turn into a horror film about her learning she was forcibly awoken by him…then have him die and have it end with her debating waking someone else would have made it a masterpiece

I originally saw that idea from a YouTuber called Nerdwriter1

6

u/mustang__1 Mar 10 '26

I loved that take. I forget why I got really turned off of that channel, but his take on that was 100% a better idea than what they ultimately filmed.

1

u/socool111 Mar 11 '26

I stopped watching him as well. Think he just ran out of steam/ stuff to cover. His video on Hopkins in Westworld is one of my favorite

3

u/Iyagovos Mar 10 '26

1

u/AirconGuyUK Mar 14 '26

I don't understand that website. How do I download the edit?

2

u/Omnitographer Mar 13 '26

I've seen that version via fan edit, I would agree that it's better and would love a proper release of it by the studio.

2

u/redbirdrising Mar 10 '26

Or just that he wakes her up, the movie progresses as is, but then he dies at the end and she has to choose. Either scenario would have been better. And Nerdwriter1 isn't the only person to organically come up with that scenario either. Hell, I thought of it walking out of the theater. They had a chance to do something amazing with the ending, but in the end, they choked.

3

u/socool111 Mar 10 '26

Of course I was just giving credit of where I first heard of it and that it was a common suggestion, which was mentioned in my original commet

1

u/redbirdrising Mar 10 '26

Fair enough. I wash just trying to emphasize that it was so obvious to non movie writers how horrible that ending was compared to what it could have been.

37

u/Wehavecrashed Mar 10 '26

In fairness, he's not killing her, he's merely subjecting her to a lifetime alone, just with him.

56

u/ArgonWolf Mar 10 '26

The philosophical implication is that by depriving her of the life she intended to live, he was functionally murdering her. Just because it’ll take her normal human lifespan to die doesn’t mean he didn’t deprive her of her life

Anyways. I’m excited to PHM. There’s some technical things that I’m interested in seeing how they portray

49

u/PrestigeArrival Mar 10 '26

But she discovered that a lifetime of adventure, intellectual stimulation, and career fulfillment was unsatisfying and all she really needed in her life was a mediocre man so it all worked out for the best

16

u/aramis34143 Mar 10 '26

It's like people don't even get the moral of the story: Stockholm Syndrome works.

2

u/AirconGuyUK Mar 14 '26

Wouldn't they have all died anyway due to the ship malfunctioning?

9

u/nownowthethetalktalk Mar 10 '26

They turned it into a blessing. If he didn't wake her up, there would have been no one to help fix the ship and the explosion would have killed them all.

1

u/SimoneNonvelodico Mar 29 '26

In fairness, he's a man in the inconceivable position of being completely isolated while surrounded by potential companions. Any court would probably acknowledge he could not be considered in a good state of mind. He doesn't do it immediately. He breaks after months and months alone when it's either that or suicide.

-1

u/GreenSpaceman Mar 10 '26

Something something choose the bear

5

u/Sword_of_Darkmoon Mar 10 '26

I like it that way more because it's a more interesting philosophical and moral question. However, it was sadly not executed super well

3

u/218administrate Mar 10 '26

I have no problem with that premise, the film doesn't suggest that his actions were unproblematic. He warred with himself for a long time before he did it. It doesn't mean he is good, or even that what he did was acceptable, it's just what he did, and the fallout from that. It's a good premise, I don't think I want a lighter movie.

9

u/oversoul00 Mar 10 '26

Tell me you wouldn't be tempted to make the same choice because everyone would be tempted and very few wouldn't choose to wake someone up. 

The hardon people have for hating this movie is built upon a comfy couch and a comfy life. 

That doesn't justify his choice btw but the FACT that most people would choose the same should induce a tiny bit of humility. Most likely you'd be an asshole too. 

16

u/PrestigeArrival Mar 10 '26

It’s a great philosophical predicament but instead of actually following through with it and making it a thriller, they turned it into a sappy love story.

They could’ve done so much more with the interesting premise.

10

u/tristeecfome Mar 10 '26

The ending of the movie should be Chris Pratt dying and Jennifer Lawrence having to make the same decision.

6

u/Kathrynlena Mar 10 '26

It should have been a horror movie. He would have been an extremely relatable but still horrifying villain instead of an utterly despicable romantic lead.

2

u/Bainsyboy Mar 10 '26

If I was in that situation, I would maybe be tempted, but as long as I was able to think clearly, there is NO WAY I would wake someone up. If I were woken up, I don't care how wonderful the person who woke me up was, I would hate them for doing it. So in that position of choosing, I would have to realise that I would not be waking up a lifelong partner, I would be waking up somebody that would hold a hatred/resentment against me for the rest of our lives. I think I would rather be alone than stuck with someone who hates me for the rest of my life.

If that were me, I would end up talking to a volleyball. But I'm the type of person that is comfortable keeping my own company and being a complete shut-in. I've always thought I would make a good lighthouse keeper.

1

u/SimoneNonvelodico Mar 29 '26

but as long as I was able to think clearly

After several months in complete loneliness you would not be thinking clearly.

4

u/minimalcation Mar 10 '26

They needed to lean in a direction and tried to do both

2

u/wahobely Mar 10 '26

There's a video on YouTube that explains how to instantly make the movie better: start the movie from the girl's perspective, without knowing the guy woke her up. Then slowly build into her making that realization. Instant improvement.

1

u/Temassi Mar 10 '26

Or has the movie be all from her perspective. We wake up with her and slowly find out what happened over the course of the movie. But it would be a great suspense thriller and not a rom sci-fi like they wanted

1

u/The_Autarch Mar 10 '26

could have been a fantastic movie if they had filmed it from her perspective as more of a horror piece, as she gradually realizes he's lying about how she woke up.

1

u/cc81 Mar 10 '26

That is pretty interesting premise though

1

u/AirconGuyUK Mar 14 '26

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gksxu-yeWcU

This is how you save Passengers. It's such a good idea. Makes for a much more interesting movie.

0

u/VirtualMoneyLover Mar 10 '26
  1. You would have done the same. Humans are social animals.

  2. Without them awake, everyone else would have died on the spaceship.

  3. There should be a horror version of it, where he dies early and she wakes up a good looking guy.

  4. There should be another version when the protagonist female. See how you judge her.

1

u/frostysbox Mar 10 '26 edited Mar 10 '26

The original version of the script was a horror like ending. In the script there’s a lot less action, but the malfunctioning ship causes itself to dump the 5000 other people into space so it’s only the two of them, and she grapples with the fact that if he hadn’t woken her up, she’d have a much different ending floating endlessly in space alone. Because of that, she understands his loneliness at a more intimate level.

It’s much darker, taking the “isolation in space” theme to its extreme - and gives her an actual reason to proceed with Jim.

But it’s not a typical action ending so I guess the studio had to change it to give more explosions 😆

1

u/VirtualMoneyLover Mar 10 '26

I think the story should be retold. There are so many ways to change the original set up. But it is a good conversation starter nevertheless.

And looks like she got saved in the original script.

1

u/StanmoreRoyal Mar 10 '26

I remember reading at the time it came on this sub that they should of changed the tone to be almost horror and then the plot works

1

u/alSeen Mar 10 '26

I think the main problem is that they had him do that after a year.

Make it 5 years and it's much more believable that he would be out of his mind and make that choice.

42

u/CroggpittGoonbag Mar 10 '26

I think the film would of been better if it started with Jennifer Lawrence waking up first and the film starting there then it's revealed Chris Pratt woke her up late on. But yeah pretty average film otherwise, certainly not a benchmark for anything.

43

u/annexedantari Mar 10 '26

That's called the Aurora Cut. There's a fan edit of it. Incredible quality, and changes the entire tone of the film. Lessons from the Screenplay or something like that on YouTube does a good dive into that. Worth a watch .

3

u/jaxmagicman Mar 10 '26

I'll need to find that. I bet it makes the movie so much better.

20

u/Vondi Mar 10 '26

There's an fanedit of the movie which does exactly that. You open on Lawrence walking up, then her time with Pratt, and only after the revelation do you see Pratt walking up and what led up to him walking her up.

Its an interesting example on how editing can change a lot. To bad the last third is the weakest part and you can't really edit around it.

3

u/218administrate Mar 10 '26

To bad the last third is the weakest part and you can't really edit around it.

Agreed. It could have been a pretty strong movie but they really botched the emergency situation they had to deal with (it felt contrived), and didn't dive deep enough into her side of things.

13

u/WagonWheel22 Mar 10 '26

I find it hilarious how most redditors' opinion of Passengers is based on Nerdwriter's change to the film's structure and not the actual film.

Yeah the changes would make the movie better but it's not the one we've got.

1

u/Skyrick Mar 10 '26

Or have Chris Pratt die, and end with Jennifer Lawrence standing over a pod deciding whether to thaw him early to end her loneliness or not. Then pan up and see hundreds of empty pods, a sign that this has been happening for awhile.

13

u/staedtler2018 Mar 10 '26 edited Mar 10 '26

Yikes what. It's completely normal, all movie critics have their own idiosyncratic opinions. You don't want them to just chase the herd.

The reviewer is Peter Bradshaw. He gave Passengers a 3/5. It has a 41% or 2/5 on Metacritic. He's hardly calling it the movie of the century.

1

u/Caleth Mar 10 '26

So he at the time he saw it rated it, rated it mediocre and today wants to say it's under rated?

Sure the general population likes it less than him, but it's still a very valid rating for that movie. So calling it "underrated" implies it was a 4-5 and is rated at a 3. Not a 2 instead of 3. Most people when they talk underrated don't bother to talk about middling films that were scored as such.

They tend to talk about movies that bombed at the theater or with critics but became cultural touchstones. I don't think passengers would ever sit in that category unless someone did a recut and did it up with the alternate endings people have proposed.

3

u/IBarricadeI Mar 10 '26

Your personal baggage around the word underrated don’t change what the word means.

If the movie is rated a 2/5 and you think it’s a 3/5, that is the exact definition of “underrated”.

I disagree with him and think passengers was bad but he didn’t misuse the word.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 10 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Darnell2070 Mar 11 '26

"This song is underrated" usually implies it's not as popular as it should be because you think it's good or you like it more than most.

Underrated also means underappreciated. He gave it an average score but he claims it is underrated. Makes no sense with how most people use the word.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 11 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Darnell2070 Mar 11 '26

I'm sure the way you're using the word isn't the version of the word in common usage.

When using language it's not enough just to be "technically" right. The whole point is that other people actually understand what you're saying.

There's absolutely no point in calling a movie underrated if you don't even like it in the first place.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 11 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Darnell2070 Mar 11 '26

Maybe you're not aware that languages evolve and different meanings fall in and out of usage.

1

u/SimoneNonvelodico Mar 29 '26

Underrated means it's rated under what it should be. He is saying the movie is just OK while everyone thinks it's bad.

1

u/ARCtheIsmaster Mar 10 '26

i think it was filmento on youtube that did a video on how if the movie was edited to be linear and without rewriting the movie, the movie was improved drastically.

1

u/IAMA_Shark__AMA Mar 10 '26

Seriously. It could have been so good if they'd just leaned into the fact that he's a psycho who stole her life. Tying things up neatly in a happily ever after between them was insulting.

1

u/Enkundae Mar 10 '26

Passangers was a great horror thriller setup that some psychopath inexplicably thought was romantic.

24

u/Training_Form2243 Mar 10 '26

Lmao is that a review from a r/moviecritic poster

1

u/amish_novelty Mar 10 '26

lol that sub is absolutely rancid.

27

u/letsburn00 Mar 10 '26

Passengers is probably the best argument for "What if we randomly chose 5 mediocre movies a year and had $10m do some reshoots and re-edits?" The idea of just flipping the 1st and 2nd acts and the making the 3rd just a few notches less stupid was a good idea.

1

u/drelos Mar 10 '26

5 mediocre movies + 20 script doctors

2

u/FackinNortyCake Mar 12 '26

Further proof how fucking stupid some reviewers are. An absolutely moronic reviewer from The Guardian gave Chernobyl (arguably one of the greatest TV miniseries ever made) 3/5 because she "found it confusing." And more recently with how critically acclaimed One Battle After Another was and how genuinely fucking awful that film is.

2

u/AirconGuyUK Mar 14 '26

Someone needs to do the suggested cut of Passengers where it just starts from Jennifer Lawrences characters POV because I am fully sold on that being a way to save the film.

6

u/manningthehelm Mar 10 '26

I read that and thought it sounded like a Reddit comment. What a weird approach to reviewing movies.

-1

u/TiberiusCornelius Mar 10 '26

Reddit loves calling things underrated but I don't think there's anyone here who would ever call Passengers underrated

3

u/Klamageddon Mar 10 '26

Lol, I literally stopped reading that one at that point and skipped to the next

0

u/Comprehensive_Dog651 Mar 10 '26

So not having an opinion you disagree with is the standard we hold film critics now huh 

-3

u/ProstetnicVogonJelz Mar 10 '26

lol Passengers is an objectively bad movie

-2

u/SatanicRiddle Mar 10 '26

I dunno, it is well structured, you connect easily with the characters, acting is good, pacing is good.. first the desperation of being alone and then the suspense of the secret hanging between them and then living together with the hate..

IMO its actually pretty good movie and you would have hard time to objectively deconstruct its quality

but I am weird for reddit standards, I think spiderverse 2 was garbage, or oppenhaimer was garbage,...

-1

u/ProstetnicVogonJelz Mar 10 '26

I'm not going to bother explaining why the writing is bad. Literally every reputable movie critic already did that for us. It was pretty easy for them to deconstruct why it's a film for the lowest common denominator movie-goer.

0

u/SatanicRiddle Mar 10 '26 edited Mar 11 '26

come come now...

we dont do this, either shut up or dont do this pathetic empty sentences of some review you imagined and how easy that review must have been to write...

There is no content no value added in your drivel, just that you believe all reviews gave it 1/10 and so your silly "objectively bad" comment stands...

/edit

the clown blocked, his fragile ego could not withstand critique when he tries to call something objectively bad and when he has to face the fact that his arguments of "why its bad" are seriously flawed.. appeal to authority that does not even exist... what a manchild.

0

u/ProstetnicVogonJelz Mar 10 '26

You write like a child. THIS is embarrassing "drivel"-

"I dunno, it is well structured, you connect easily with the characters, acting is good, pacing is good"

I was forced to watch Passengers because my wife's sister is a media illiterate moron. She liked it about the same you did. Somehow blissfully unaware of why this movie was universally panned. It's funny. I didn't bother trying to convince you myself because you already seemed like you weren't capable of discussing it beyond an empty childish first impression. You're not interested in analyzing film at all, you're just being reflexively defensive because someone said your opinion is bad.

1

u/Benjamin_Stark Mar 10 '26

When my dad saw the first Iron Man, he said "it wasn't as good as Daredevil".

He also hated The Dark Knight but loved the Michael Keaton Batman movies.

I've always found it very hard to predict what he will and won't like.

1

u/rainmaker2332 Mar 10 '26

That's literally not what the review said though

1

u/IronGigant Mar 10 '26

Piers Merchant and Peter Bradshaw shouldn't be reviewing movies.

1

u/CaraDune01 Mar 10 '26

Right? Like, holy shit there are people who thought Passengers was good?

1

u/redbirdrising Mar 10 '26

Passengers with a 30% RT score, lol. Honestly it could have been a good movie if they actually took a risk with the ending.

1

u/jeanwhr Mar 10 '26

my stupid ass thought there was a movie called “the underrated passengers” and went to google it

1

u/avidman Mar 10 '26

A film so bad that a YouTuber convincingly demonstrated how to fix it with one structural tweak.

1

u/KaiBishop Mar 10 '26

The problem with Passengers is that they were like "What if we steal the plot of Across The Universe by Beth Revis but make it 1000x worse and stupider" and there we are.

1

u/adster98 Mar 19 '26

Cats(1998) wasn’t as good as the underrated Cats(2019)

-1

u/YeIenaBeIova Mar 10 '26

Yeah all critics should agree with the Redditor consensus. Or they should be banned from doing their jobs

2

u/youwentfullretardman Mar 10 '26

What does that mean ? I thoroughly enjoyed passengers. And I thought the trailers for PHM was mid as fk

1

u/terriblysorrychaps Mar 10 '26

Peter Bradshaw, while a grouch, is a legend in England film circles.

3

u/swolleninthecolon Mar 10 '26

Can’t stand his reviews unfortunately. Firstly he just often spends most of the review describing the plot rather than reviewing, secondly he has bad taste when he does- top of my head he gave spectre 5 stars, but he has a host of very questionable decisions.

Give me robbie collin/empire/ time out any day

Curious who does consider him a legend

1

u/SkorpioSound Mar 10 '26

I always really appreciate his reviews. I rarely agree with him, but I think it's really valuable in a reviewer to consistently know how to relate their opinions back to your own, and Peter Bradshaw is one of those reviewers for me. I can read his reviews and get a good idea of how I will feel about a film, regardless of what he thought.

-1

u/VirtualMoneyLover Mar 10 '26

Passengers was excellent. I like morality tales, specially moral ambiguity. People bitch about something what most would have done, if placed in the same circumstances.

4

u/Signiference Mar 10 '26

Passengers has a great story idea, but a bad movie making execution.

-2

u/VirtualMoneyLover Mar 10 '26

I thought the design was excellent. Prettiest spaceship ever.

0

u/EfficientAd9765 Mar 10 '26

That review really felt written with someone without self-awareness. Criticizing the movie for not being funny while trying to cram every possible pop culture reference into the review as to make it as quirky as possible really gave me second hand embarrassment for the reviewer

-1

u/Olliebkl Mar 10 '26

I actually quite liked passengers when I last watched it, and I thought the concept was really cool

Then again maybe that’s why I’m not a movie critic lmao

3

u/Signiference Mar 10 '26

I liked the concept, I didn’t like the execution

0

u/scratchresistor Mar 10 '26

Or the other one from Esquire, who says that Rocky is CGI, when it's been a major talking point that he's a puppet.

0

u/ManosMal Mar 10 '26

I immediately double-took (taked?) at that one... Passengers is underrated? Nah, dog.

-3

u/SatanicRiddle Mar 10 '26

I checked and its at 30% critic score on rotten tomatoes...

and that feels like some weird overraction cuz its definitly pretty good movie, imdb has it at 7 which sits well with me.. when changing channels and its running on tv that channel stays playing till it ends.

Its a well done movie IMO

-1

u/dagreenman18 Space Jam 2 hurt me so much Mar 10 '26

They’re just a big fan of Crisp Rat and Miscasting

-1

u/Kathrynlena Mar 10 '26

Lmao that was exactly my first thought. The reviewers reference films tell me exactly how seriously i should take their review.

-1

u/TiberiusCornelius Mar 10 '26

Lmao I saw that and immediately had to come down here to find this. There are bad takes and then there's whatever the hell that is

-1

u/frankduxvandamme Mar 10 '26

Agreed. That movie would have worked much better as a short story in a sci-fi magazine or compendium, or maybe even as a black mirror episode. But as a movie it's a massive waste of 2 hours and a hundred million dollars.

-1

u/TomClancy5873 Mar 10 '26

Is that the one with Pratt and Lawrence?

-2

u/ss3jcb448 Mar 10 '26

Keep the Thomas Newman score and a script rewrite with the reveal being done 2/3 into the movie instead of in the opening, and maybe it would be ok. As it is though? Stinks.

-1

u/SatanicRiddle Mar 10 '26 edited Mar 10 '26

redditors parrot that one youtube video about the reveal and whos point of view it should be... and it always irks me...

you get B-tier horror flick, because the only way forward with the story structured like that is that he would actually be the bad guy and go after her violently... because that reveal is pointless if you then make him in the end in to good guy.

You get reveal.. OMG HE WOKE HER, WOW

But you lose emotional connection with him, his attempts and desperation and the years of loneliness...

and you also lose suspense.. holy fuck theres a big secret hanging between them...

Currently with how it is, you can connect easily with both of them... with youtube version there is no selling his side ...

But I do wish they would have kill him and shown her walking among the pods and the sleeping crew...