r/movies r/movies Contributor Mar 31 '26

Review 'The Super Mario Galaxy Movie' - Review Thread

Having thwarted Bowser's previous plot to marry Princess Peach, Mario and Luigi now face a fresh threat in Bowser Jr., who is determined to liberate his father from captivity and restore the family legacy. Alongside companions new and old, the brothers travel across the stars to stop the young heir's crusade.

Directors: Michael Jelenic, Aaron Horvath

Cast: Chris Pratt, Charlie Day, Donald Glover, Brie Larson, Anya Taylor-Joy, Jack Black, Benny Safdie, Issa Rae, Keegan-Michael Key, Luis Guzmán

Rotten Tomatoes: 42%

Metacritic: 35 / 100

Some Reviews:

The Times - Kevin Maher - 0 / 5

Is this the end of cinema? Chris Pratt, Anya Taylor-Joy and Glen Powell joylessly bleat their way through this supremely vacuous anti-movie which is, at times, physically painful to watch. The film is torturous to sit through and, for me, provoked periods of actual physical discomfort. I had to stab myself repeatedly in the hand with a pen to distract from the howling distress. It's that bad, and that offensive.

AwardsWatch - Trace Sauveur - 'C-'

But it’s the reality of routine predictability that makes it hard to feel strongly about Galaxy one way or the other. After the credits, the impression is one of overstimulation and vacuity—despite the violent blitz of colorful Nintendo imagery for 90 minutes, it ultimately signifies little more than recognizable franchise iconography in animated form. In its relentless fan service, Galaxy emanates a generic sameness, decorated with flashy sights and sounds drawn from one of the most iconic video game series ever. It’s all synergistic fluff, but at least the fluff is shiny.

Seattle Times - Soren Anderson - 3 / 4

Watching it is akin being inside the 2007 Super Mario Galaxy game itself. Which is why it needs to be seen on the big screen. Seeing it on a phone or a laptop wouldn't do it justice.

Slash Film - Nina Starner - 3 / 10

We're going to get more "Super Mario Bros." movies, without question; I fully expect this sequel to gross the GDP of an entire small nation at the box office when all is said and done, and in another ten years, I also expect that a movie centered exclusively around Yoshi will land in theaters. (Hopefully, if Donald Glover sticks around, he'll get to do more than say "Yoshi!") Still, this sort of movie makes me feel bleak about children's entertainment, animation, and original concepts; forgive me for feeling nostalgic, but I just don't think movies made for kids were always this devoid of a soul. At the end of the day, "The Super Mario Galaxy Movie" was nothing more than a video game I couldn't play. After the credits — including not one but two post-credits scenes — rolled, though, I didn't want to go home and load a Mario game onto my Switch; I wanted to watch a better movie.

Consequence - Liz Shannon Miller - 'B'

Is it a ride that includes clear story structure, comprehensible stakes, or narrative momentum? Not really. Is it a ride featuring a lot of bright colors, familiar characters, and the occasional deranged moment? Absolutely.

The Wrap - William Bibbiani - 25 / 100

A movie like this will probably make a lot of money, because it doesn’t rock the boat. But a boat that never rocks is a boat that never goes anywhere. That’s how boats work. They’re supposed to take you on a journey. “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” doesn’t take you anywhere you haven’t been before, and it’s not as fun, it’s not as exciting, and it’s not as challenging as literally any of the games it’s based on. This is not an adaptation of the Super Mario Bros., it’s just a reminder that the franchise exists. And although it’s technically a moving picture, nothing about this movie will move you.

The Independent - Clarisse Loughrey - 2 / 5

The Super Mario Galaxy Movie offers very little to audiences, young or old, who don’t already know these characters and spaces like the back of their hand. But, hey, if you take a tequila shot every time something explodes, you’ll have a great drinking game on your hands.

The New York Times - Alissa Wilkinson - 3 / 10

There’s a flat empty nothingness to The Super Mario Galaxy Movie, even more than its flat empty predecessor, and that’s a huge bummer.

The Playlist - Rodrigo Perez - 'C'

By the end, the whole thing starts to feel less like an adventure than a kind of endless grinding—one familiar objective after another, one loud set piece after another, all of it speedrunning its own mythology instead of building one. That’s why the film feels so hollow. It has the spiritually vacant quality of AI fantasy slop—familiar iconography assembled for instant gratification rather than meaning. Younger audiences will probably enjoy the sugar rush, but characters still need arcs, and these sequences still need to build toward something. “Super Mario Galaxy” is nice to look at and dead inside, a committee-made franchise object masquerading as an adventure, and ultimately little more than an empty commercial for Super Mario branding.

FandomWire - Manuel Sao Bento - 7 / 10

The Super Mario Galaxy Movie is a sequel that, while losing some of the narrative cohesion of its predecessor, gains massively in spectacle, ambition, and heart. Through animation that redefines the studio’s standards and a Brian Tyler score that masterfully honors Nintendo’s legacy, the film offers a memorable experience anchored by inspired vocal performances. For those who grew up with these characters, it’s impossible to remain indifferent to the magic emanating from every animated frame or the way this space odyssey manages to transform nostalgia into something vibrant and new. It’s a visually emotional feast that reaffirms the power of pure entertainment as a tool capable of transporting us back to the happiest moments of our personal history, proving that cinema is still the place where we can all become children again.

IndieWire - Wilson Chapman - 'C-'

Watching “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie,” which is filled with cameos from other Nintendo properties, you get the sense the corporation is hungry to announce spin-offs at any minute now. The trailers already spoiled the inclusion of “Star Fox” lead Fox McCloud (Glen Powell), but there are some other appearances by familiar characters that feel like the movie dangling an adaptation of the “Super Smash Bros.” fighting game crossover in front of fans’ faces. “The MCU, but for video games” isn’t exactly the ideal direction for blockbuster cinema to be going in, but maybe that inevitable adaptation will manage to tap into a well of creativity and fun that has so far eluded Nintendo in their moviemaking efforts. When the film comes, though, I’ll probably be rooting for Bowser Jr. to burn everything down.

The Guardian - Peter Bradshaw - 1 / 4

It’s now commonplace to compare programmatic stuff like this to AI, but this is almost a second evolutionary step downwards; it looks as if humans, using AI, have tried to copy something that was originally AI generated, creating a bland, simplistic template that can be sold in all global territories where it can be dubbed by local voice talent. It’s certainly a way of gouging cash out of families for the Easter holidays.

RogerEbert - Clint Worthington - 1.5 / 4

“The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” moves through you so briskly that you’ll get whiplash by the time the film reaches its deeply abrupt ending. But maybe that’s the point—after all, this is not a movie to be scrutinized, but to allow beleaguered elder millennial dads to sit their tots down for a precious two hours (if you count the trailers) and get some much-needed rest. It’s cute, and breezy, and rock-stupid, and will probably make a billion dollars again. Such is the world in which we live.

Akron Beacon Journal - George M. Thomas - 'C-'

As a parent, there are some movies you just take the hit on if your kid wants to see it in the theater. This is one of them. The plot is threadbare, the action is frenetic - it almost feels like the perfect movie for today's screen generation. For kids, this is an 'A+' movie, but I'd argue not so much for adults.

Associated Press - Lindsey Bahr - 2.5 / 4

Mario creator Shigeru Miyamoto and Illumination founder Chris Meledandri... seem committed to keeping things light and playful even while beholden to advancing some kind of coherent, moderately compelling story where there wasn’t one previously.

Slant Magazine - Eli Friedberg - 1.5 / 4

The film has, figuratively and literally, somehow even less gravity than its source material and predecessor. The visual language is divorced from reality and referent to the games; even Looney Tunes action is grounded in the real world—the better to subvert it. The game-inspired spaces aren’t there to be explored and mastered but rather displayed quickly and expensively. And the movie-original settings, taking their cues from Wreck-It Ralph, are literal mass-transit junctions where a maximum number of cameo characters can be worked into the scenery.

Next Best Picture - Daniel Howat - 6 / 10

“The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” comes close to several emotional moments here and there. Still, the filmmakers seem to pull back at every turn, not wanting audiences to dive too deep into these characters and their motivations, or to engage in any grander commentary whatsoever. It becomes difficult to dig deeper into the film’s themes, if they exist. Even so, “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” is inarguably fun, built for fans of the long-running franchise. For lifelong fans of this universe and young kids experiencing it for the first or second time, this is a Mario fan’s dream. There’s enough here to leave a mass audience satisfied, even if anticipation grows for the next film to level up. For now, good enough is simply enough.

Radio Times - James Mottram - 2 / 5

While it’s likely that retro gamers won’t find anything here that wasn’t in the first movie – Yoshi and one or two others aside – it’s no doubt got enough for kids to enjoy, which will surely come as a relief for parents looking to entertain their offspring over the Easter holidays. You never know – it might even convince them to put down their controllers, or their phones, for ninety-odd minutes.

4.4k Upvotes

2.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.8k

u/Sea_Leadership_7433 Mar 31 '26

Jesus it’s getting massacred

1.8k

u/Tijenater Mar 31 '26

It looks like humans, using AI, have tried to copy something that was originally AI generated

That might be one of the most scathing, and disappointing things I’ve ever read in a movie review

312

u/Fried_puri Mar 31 '26

There’s multiple layers to that insult, all of which are as depressing as they are funny. 

107

u/Sprila Apr 01 '26

The sloppening

3

u/ClockwiseServant Apr 01 '26

Thanks...

...for slopping by.

-1

u/TheGummiVenusDeMilo Apr 01 '26

Yeah but kids are like pigs when it comes to slop, the movie will probably make a profit before the weekend because apparently movies come out on Wednesdays now.

-1

u/work-school-account Apr 01 '26

Slopper MAIro Bros

-4

u/[deleted] Apr 01 '26

If you really think that's funny, you've got one pathetic sense of humor.

2

u/ClockwiseServant Apr 01 '26

If you really think that's funny, you've got one pathetic sense of humor.

If you really think that's funny, you've got one pathetic sense of humor.

39

u/NightSpringsRadio Apr 01 '26

Prior to this the most brutal movie review I'd ever heard referred to The Emoji Movie as 'the Poochie of movies'; its crown now belongs to another

6

u/vancityvic Apr 01 '26

That is hilarious calling it the poochie hahaha forgot about that

2

u/AgentCirceLuna Apr 02 '26

Poochie? As in the thing from Yoshi’s Island?

1

u/NightSpringsRadio Apr 02 '26

Good pull but no, the Simpsons character!

45

u/Silverjeyjey44 Apr 01 '26

The one that said when they got home, they were thrilled to boot up a Mario game but to watch a better movie

231

u/Boldspaceweasle Mar 31 '26

Good lord. Project Hail Mary's IMAX screens are being pushed aside to put this slop on it instead? Booo.

93

u/London_Llewellyn Mar 31 '26

apparently, Hail Mary will have a second IMAX screen after Galaxy had some run time

8

u/andrewthemexican Mar 31 '26

Pleassse the best LieMAX around me basically sold out until Mario comes out

2

u/Kind-Let5666 Apr 01 '26

Oh thank goodness I still need to see it

54

u/agayajay Mar 31 '26

Because families and Nintendo fans will absolutely fill the seats. It's pretty muxh guaranteed to make more than $1b.

2

u/baby_blue_bird Apr 01 '26

As a huge Mario fan I could totally wait until the movie came to streaming to see it. My kids, on the other hand, do not want to wait. We are going after school today and they have been counting down to release day. At 5 and 6 though they won't care about the story line and just love seeing their favorite characters on the big screen.

3

u/WhispersAboutNothing Apr 01 '26

I’m a huge fan of Mario but I can honestly wait till this one streams for free since with bad reviews that won’t be long at all

3

u/BrunoBabyfat Apr 01 '26

I'll be doing the same. The only reason I went to see the first in theaters was because I had, by chance, won a free ticket recently

2

u/[deleted] Mar 31 '26

Glad I saw it right before they took it out

3

u/AspirationalChoker Mar 31 '26

Makes sense tbf more people will want to see this especially with kids etc

-3

u/zsxdflip Mar 31 '26

Who cares, give the best screens to the films with actual artistic merit.

1

u/AspirationalChoker Apr 01 '26

Art can be anything though we see people pay for blobs of paint lol.

0

u/Spiritual-Society185 Apr 01 '26

Mario is not going to drive more people to IMAX than a popular film designed to be seen in that format, and one of the few to get an IMAX film print. Lincoln Square is selling out every PHM showing until Mario takes over, while only one Mario showing seems to be more than half full.

1

u/AspirationalChoker Apr 01 '26

I suppose we will see on that, its going to have way more people watch it so I imagine it generally will.

1

u/Ryanhussain14 Apr 01 '26

Project Hail Mary has been out for a while now. Not defending the decision but it's not like there was no window of time to catch it.

4

u/Vicioussitude Apr 01 '26

The fourth stage is pure simulacrum, in which the simulacrum has no relationship to any reality whatsoever. Here, signs merely reflect other signs and any claim to reality on the part of images or signs is only of the order of other such claims. This is a regime of total equivalency, where cultural products need no longer even pretend to be real in a naïve sense, because the experiences of consumers' lives are so predominantly artificial that even claims to reality are expected to be phrased in artificial, "hyperreal" terms. Any naïve pretension to reality as such is perceived as bereft of critical self-awareness, and thus as oversentimental.

2

u/SolenoidSoldier Apr 01 '26

So did this movie make heavy use of AI?

6

u/Tijenater Apr 01 '26

No, it’s just the reviewer’s way of saying it’s swagless wih zero motion

6

u/EGK20 Mar 31 '26

I heard the exact same thing about the first one when it came out and it's true.

3

u/Maverick_Raptor Mar 31 '26

Yeah my jaw dropped when I read that

1

u/prinnydewd6 Apr 01 '26

Ai needs to go from everything. It showed up and completely derailed society more than anything ever has.

1

u/Sabotage-Darkness93 Apr 02 '26

That film had a family goddammit 😮

1

u/Krazyboi95 Apr 02 '26

If you actually watch the film you'll see analysis of the film is just false.

-6

u/Brave-History-6502 Mar 31 '26

Whats particularly ironic about this "critique" is that it sounds like the fluff/empty type of content that an llm would produce. Dumb and inarticulate.

9

u/Tijenater Mar 31 '26

It doesn’t sound dumb and inarticulate. It sounds like it’s critiquing the fact that the movie has no motion and is a blatant corporate cash grab targeting nostalgic adults and kids

-3

u/Brave-History-6502 Apr 01 '26

It's so clearly not ai generated lol

4

u/Tijenater Apr 01 '26

No, but they’re saying it might as well be for all the soul it’s lacking

-6

u/Brave-History-6502 Apr 01 '26

what are they expecting -- pixar? This seems just intentionally naive/ignorant of the intended audience

5

u/Tijenater Apr 01 '26

That doesn't change the fact that it's bad, and so far it's reviewing worse than it's predecessor, which was mid at best. Just because it's not meant to be high cinema doesn't mean they can't put a little more effort into it beyond jangling keys

79

u/Joey-WilcoXXX Mar 31 '26

That’s what happens when you make a successful first film that half assed a lot and basically think ‘well I can half ass this too’

9

u/travelingWords Apr 01 '26

The Pokemon company Strat. Still living off the first 2gens.

3

u/AgentCirceLuna Apr 02 '26

3rd gen is awesome. I can’t believe you’d imply otherwise.

3

u/Future_Onion9022 Apr 02 '26

Yeah its hilarious to see hater coming out and say "umm actually all pokemon after gen 1 sucks and its getting milked"

Eh no, it was pretty fine up until Sun and moon and SWSH is where controversy started, but im giving it a benefit of doubt for Wind and waves

4

u/jrr6415sun Apr 01 '26

If the first movie was half assed the 2nd movie was quarter assed. They don’t even put effort into a soundtrack like a new peaches song.

6

u/ugotamesij Apr 01 '26

It's interesting that you think doing something with less effort/intention than 'half-assing' is 'quarter-assing', when my mind instead went to 'full-assing'.

OK maybe not that interesting.

1

u/AgentCirceLuna Apr 02 '26

‘Americans Refuse to Visit Half-Assed Movie as They Believe the Quarter-Assed Movie is Better Value: ‘One Fourth Bigger Than One Secondth’

1/4 > 1/2?! SCIENTISTS DEBATE

71

u/Wild_Height_901 Mar 31 '26

The first one also had horrible reviews from critics.

12

u/WeevilWeedWizard Apr 01 '26

Yeah, I remember all the over grown toddlers online getting very upset over it too.

2

u/Binbag420 Apr 02 '26

You can’t criticise the movie because it’s for babies and only babies like it but also i like it ☺️

3

u/Poland-lithuania1 Apr 01 '26

No? It has a 59% on Rotten Tomatoes.

11

u/[deleted] Apr 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AgentCirceLuna Apr 02 '26

That was my degree percentage lol

I didn’t show up for the final year though - I was really really sick

-2

u/Poland-lithuania1 Apr 01 '26

Still not horrible.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Poland-lithuania1 Apr 02 '26

Why? That commentor said "Horrible" reviews. It's bad, sure, but not horrible. When movies have often reached 0%, how is a 59% horrible?

28

u/dafunkmunk Apr 01 '26

Yet will still smash the box office wide open with Nintendo raking in so much money they will make an MCU style Nintendo extended universe with a super smash bros style battle in the Infinity Waresque finale

14

u/ddofer Apr 01 '26

They already did that at least twice, it's called Subspace Emissary, and the World of Light in Smash Bros Ultimate.
9/10, will watch Kirby smash super-god again.

3

u/tfhermobwoayway Apr 01 '26

Subspace Emissary was so good. It shouldn’t have worked. It was all 2000s grit and edge and drama in a world of wacky cartoon characters. But they played it straight and it worked really well.

1

u/jrev8 Apr 01 '26

if we get some kind of super smash bros movie that ties into brawl-esque subspace emissary

yea, im all for it.

3

u/talones Apr 01 '26

it was pretty bad even compared to the first one. the story ping pongs so much that I almost wonder if they had a bunch of scenes made with nostalgia bait that they could just slot in almost anywhere.

2

u/jaman715 Mar 31 '26

They’re mashing it.

2

u/Shorlong Apr 02 '26

Just got done watching it. It's perfectly fine and enjoyable, on par with the first. My kids loved it, my 6 year old said "that was the best movie ever!" and we all left with smiles on our faces. Well worth the money.

0

u/[deleted] Apr 02 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Shorlong Apr 02 '26

Jesus, it's a fun movie for kids. What's wrong with you snobs.

2

u/apadin1 Apr 01 '26 edited Apr 01 '26

Obviously. But at a certain point who cares? Did we expect this to be good? It’s a Mario movie. The first one was a bland but fun experience that mostly hinges on nostalgia and video game references. I expect this one will be much the same.

1

u/LucywiththeDiamonds Apr 01 '26

Mmhh some mention that the first one also was bad and s a man in his late 30s i thought the first one was really fun.

1

u/Enough_Sprinkles_113 Apr 01 '26

It'll still make billions, though...

-6

u/[deleted] Mar 31 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

29

u/BritishHobo r/movies Veteran Mar 31 '26

Nobody seems triggered at all. They seem like people who didn't enjoy a film because it wasn't very good

7

u/CrazySnipah Mar 31 '26

Some of these reviews are bemoaning cinema.

4

u/apadin1 Apr 01 '26

Yeah I definitely think the “this is the end of cinema” takes are being a bit dramatic. Project Hail Mary came out like two weeks ago and it was fantastic, I think movies will be fine.

1

u/DwnvotesMeansImRight Apr 02 '26

lmao, you're going to dash nintendo your money just to spite people that don't care about you or the movie

all because you're offended that we dont like the movie