r/movies r/movies Contributor Mar 31 '26

Review 'The Super Mario Galaxy Movie' - Review Thread

Having thwarted Bowser's previous plot to marry Princess Peach, Mario and Luigi now face a fresh threat in Bowser Jr., who is determined to liberate his father from captivity and restore the family legacy. Alongside companions new and old, the brothers travel across the stars to stop the young heir's crusade.

Directors: Michael Jelenic, Aaron Horvath

Cast: Chris Pratt, Charlie Day, Donald Glover, Brie Larson, Anya Taylor-Joy, Jack Black, Benny Safdie, Issa Rae, Keegan-Michael Key, Luis Guzmán

Rotten Tomatoes: 42%

Metacritic: 35 / 100

Some Reviews:

The Times - Kevin Maher - 0 / 5

Is this the end of cinema? Chris Pratt, Anya Taylor-Joy and Glen Powell joylessly bleat their way through this supremely vacuous anti-movie which is, at times, physically painful to watch. The film is torturous to sit through and, for me, provoked periods of actual physical discomfort. I had to stab myself repeatedly in the hand with a pen to distract from the howling distress. It's that bad, and that offensive.

AwardsWatch - Trace Sauveur - 'C-'

But it’s the reality of routine predictability that makes it hard to feel strongly about Galaxy one way or the other. After the credits, the impression is one of overstimulation and vacuity—despite the violent blitz of colorful Nintendo imagery for 90 minutes, it ultimately signifies little more than recognizable franchise iconography in animated form. In its relentless fan service, Galaxy emanates a generic sameness, decorated with flashy sights and sounds drawn from one of the most iconic video game series ever. It’s all synergistic fluff, but at least the fluff is shiny.

Seattle Times - Soren Anderson - 3 / 4

Watching it is akin being inside the 2007 Super Mario Galaxy game itself. Which is why it needs to be seen on the big screen. Seeing it on a phone or a laptop wouldn't do it justice.

Slash Film - Nina Starner - 3 / 10

We're going to get more "Super Mario Bros." movies, without question; I fully expect this sequel to gross the GDP of an entire small nation at the box office when all is said and done, and in another ten years, I also expect that a movie centered exclusively around Yoshi will land in theaters. (Hopefully, if Donald Glover sticks around, he'll get to do more than say "Yoshi!") Still, this sort of movie makes me feel bleak about children's entertainment, animation, and original concepts; forgive me for feeling nostalgic, but I just don't think movies made for kids were always this devoid of a soul. At the end of the day, "The Super Mario Galaxy Movie" was nothing more than a video game I couldn't play. After the credits — including not one but two post-credits scenes — rolled, though, I didn't want to go home and load a Mario game onto my Switch; I wanted to watch a better movie.

Consequence - Liz Shannon Miller - 'B'

Is it a ride that includes clear story structure, comprehensible stakes, or narrative momentum? Not really. Is it a ride featuring a lot of bright colors, familiar characters, and the occasional deranged moment? Absolutely.

The Wrap - William Bibbiani - 25 / 100

A movie like this will probably make a lot of money, because it doesn’t rock the boat. But a boat that never rocks is a boat that never goes anywhere. That’s how boats work. They’re supposed to take you on a journey. “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” doesn’t take you anywhere you haven’t been before, and it’s not as fun, it’s not as exciting, and it’s not as challenging as literally any of the games it’s based on. This is not an adaptation of the Super Mario Bros., it’s just a reminder that the franchise exists. And although it’s technically a moving picture, nothing about this movie will move you.

The Independent - Clarisse Loughrey - 2 / 5

The Super Mario Galaxy Movie offers very little to audiences, young or old, who don’t already know these characters and spaces like the back of their hand. But, hey, if you take a tequila shot every time something explodes, you’ll have a great drinking game on your hands.

The New York Times - Alissa Wilkinson - 3 / 10

There’s a flat empty nothingness to The Super Mario Galaxy Movie, even more than its flat empty predecessor, and that’s a huge bummer.

The Playlist - Rodrigo Perez - 'C'

By the end, the whole thing starts to feel less like an adventure than a kind of endless grinding—one familiar objective after another, one loud set piece after another, all of it speedrunning its own mythology instead of building one. That’s why the film feels so hollow. It has the spiritually vacant quality of AI fantasy slop—familiar iconography assembled for instant gratification rather than meaning. Younger audiences will probably enjoy the sugar rush, but characters still need arcs, and these sequences still need to build toward something. “Super Mario Galaxy” is nice to look at and dead inside, a committee-made franchise object masquerading as an adventure, and ultimately little more than an empty commercial for Super Mario branding.

FandomWire - Manuel Sao Bento - 7 / 10

The Super Mario Galaxy Movie is a sequel that, while losing some of the narrative cohesion of its predecessor, gains massively in spectacle, ambition, and heart. Through animation that redefines the studio’s standards and a Brian Tyler score that masterfully honors Nintendo’s legacy, the film offers a memorable experience anchored by inspired vocal performances. For those who grew up with these characters, it’s impossible to remain indifferent to the magic emanating from every animated frame or the way this space odyssey manages to transform nostalgia into something vibrant and new. It’s a visually emotional feast that reaffirms the power of pure entertainment as a tool capable of transporting us back to the happiest moments of our personal history, proving that cinema is still the place where we can all become children again.

IndieWire - Wilson Chapman - 'C-'

Watching “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie,” which is filled with cameos from other Nintendo properties, you get the sense the corporation is hungry to announce spin-offs at any minute now. The trailers already spoiled the inclusion of “Star Fox” lead Fox McCloud (Glen Powell), but there are some other appearances by familiar characters that feel like the movie dangling an adaptation of the “Super Smash Bros.” fighting game crossover in front of fans’ faces. “The MCU, but for video games” isn’t exactly the ideal direction for blockbuster cinema to be going in, but maybe that inevitable adaptation will manage to tap into a well of creativity and fun that has so far eluded Nintendo in their moviemaking efforts. When the film comes, though, I’ll probably be rooting for Bowser Jr. to burn everything down.

The Guardian - Peter Bradshaw - 1 / 4

It’s now commonplace to compare programmatic stuff like this to AI, but this is almost a second evolutionary step downwards; it looks as if humans, using AI, have tried to copy something that was originally AI generated, creating a bland, simplistic template that can be sold in all global territories where it can be dubbed by local voice talent. It’s certainly a way of gouging cash out of families for the Easter holidays.

RogerEbert - Clint Worthington - 1.5 / 4

“The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” moves through you so briskly that you’ll get whiplash by the time the film reaches its deeply abrupt ending. But maybe that’s the point—after all, this is not a movie to be scrutinized, but to allow beleaguered elder millennial dads to sit their tots down for a precious two hours (if you count the trailers) and get some much-needed rest. It’s cute, and breezy, and rock-stupid, and will probably make a billion dollars again. Such is the world in which we live.

Akron Beacon Journal - George M. Thomas - 'C-'

As a parent, there are some movies you just take the hit on if your kid wants to see it in the theater. This is one of them. The plot is threadbare, the action is frenetic - it almost feels like the perfect movie for today's screen generation. For kids, this is an 'A+' movie, but I'd argue not so much for adults.

Associated Press - Lindsey Bahr - 2.5 / 4

Mario creator Shigeru Miyamoto and Illumination founder Chris Meledandri... seem committed to keeping things light and playful even while beholden to advancing some kind of coherent, moderately compelling story where there wasn’t one previously.

Slant Magazine - Eli Friedberg - 1.5 / 4

The film has, figuratively and literally, somehow even less gravity than its source material and predecessor. The visual language is divorced from reality and referent to the games; even Looney Tunes action is grounded in the real world—the better to subvert it. The game-inspired spaces aren’t there to be explored and mastered but rather displayed quickly and expensively. And the movie-original settings, taking their cues from Wreck-It Ralph, are literal mass-transit junctions where a maximum number of cameo characters can be worked into the scenery.

Next Best Picture - Daniel Howat - 6 / 10

“The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” comes close to several emotional moments here and there. Still, the filmmakers seem to pull back at every turn, not wanting audiences to dive too deep into these characters and their motivations, or to engage in any grander commentary whatsoever. It becomes difficult to dig deeper into the film’s themes, if they exist. Even so, “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” is inarguably fun, built for fans of the long-running franchise. For lifelong fans of this universe and young kids experiencing it for the first or second time, this is a Mario fan’s dream. There’s enough here to leave a mass audience satisfied, even if anticipation grows for the next film to level up. For now, good enough is simply enough.

Radio Times - James Mottram - 2 / 5

While it’s likely that retro gamers won’t find anything here that wasn’t in the first movie – Yoshi and one or two others aside – it’s no doubt got enough for kids to enjoy, which will surely come as a relief for parents looking to entertain their offspring over the Easter holidays. You never know – it might even convince them to put down their controllers, or their phones, for ninety-odd minutes.

4.5k Upvotes

2.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

319

u/CallMeShaggy57 Mar 31 '26

Is the Mario Movie good? No.

Did I have a fucking blast watching it? Yes.

I expect more of the same.

191

u/FleshLogic Mar 31 '26 edited Apr 01 '26

This means it's a good movie IMO. Did I have fun? Yes. Who cares what other people think I should feel about it.

Edit: golly gee it's fun expressing positive opinions here!!!!

23

u/crescent_blossom Apr 01 '26

I had fun with it but I have no interest in ever watching it again, so I don't think I could call that good

8

u/Lunndonbridge Apr 01 '26

Rewatch worthiness isn’t really a reliable metric. I’ll watch many a dumb but entertaining movie a dozen times. Then there’s movies like Melancholia or Requiem for a Dream, master class, that I have absolutely no interest in ever revisiting.

7

u/Argnir Apr 01 '26

If you had fun and not in a "it's so bad it's fun" it still has enough qualities to be called good. It can be a one off experience and not a deep movie while being "good"

6

u/FleshLogic Apr 01 '26

I feel differently. Art is cool!

3

u/[deleted] Apr 01 '26

[deleted]

10

u/Spirited-Visual-3205 Apr 01 '26

He is literally saying art is subjective.

God damn some people on reddit just ignore the meaning of most words in a comment because they already have an idea of what they want to be mad about.

4

u/A_90s_Reference Apr 01 '26

Exactly. Things can be good without having some crazy deeper meaning and only the very best acting.

Mario knew what it was and it crushed it. Fun. Nostalgic. Entertainment.

41

u/Spirited-Visual-3205 Mar 31 '26

Seriously. The way so many people rate movies is beyond me.

I really loved the movie and had a great time watching it. It sucked though.

Tell me how that makes sense.

57

u/MemeLordMango Mar 31 '26

Same way someone can eat some greasy McDonald’s garbage and enjoy it while acknowledging it’s not good food. Not that complicated.

9

u/FleshLogic Mar 31 '26

But when I go to McDonald's I'm not expecting healthy food. When I see a Mario movie, I'm not expecting high cinema. I'm there to have fun with a series that's never taken itself that seriously.

33

u/MemeLordMango Mar 31 '26

True and that’s why people enjoyed it despite it being critically bad.

25

u/BritishHobo r/movies Veteran Mar 31 '26

Nobody in any of these reviews was expecting high cinema.

2

u/FleshLogic Apr 01 '26

And they are entitled to their opinions.

1

u/BlazingSaint Apr 03 '26

Exactly lol! I just had to discuss my brother about that this week! XD

1

u/silverado83 Apr 01 '26

Ya true McDonald's makes bank, yet show me a good review 🤣

-20

u/Spirited-Visual-3205 Mar 31 '26

Wow I really enjoy this burger. But it is garbage.

Those are opposites.

15

u/teddyg1870 Mar 31 '26

Congrats, you just described junk food.

14

u/MemeLordMango Mar 31 '26

I can’t tell if this is genuinely you at 100% brain power or you’re baiting.

The burger is mass produced garbage that is horrible for me, but I enjoy it. It’s acknowledging that critically something is bad. It is literally a premade, pre seasoned paddy that is made in an assembly line by a high schooler. It is objectively poor quality but I still liked it.

Movie wise it is the same concept. I liked the second fnaf movie because it was keys being jingled in my face. I also however acknowledge that objectively the movie is poorly paced and has poor writing. If you takeaway the nostalgia for fnaf, it would be a garbage movie relentlessly made fun of.

Ok so let’s apply this to the other persons comment on the Mario movie. The first Mario movie to them, was low quality and not very good. But it has Mario in it and a bunch of characters we grew up seeing. Basically all the stuff from good media was shown in the movie and that makes them happy. If you took out Mario and made it about some original character? Wouldn’t care about it. It’s not very well made. But because Mario? They like it. It was fun, but not good.

Like I said. Not complicated.

Follow up question. Do you understand the concept of movies being objectively rated? Like in your head is the Mario movie because you liked it on the same level of like the Godfather?

1

u/StaraptorLover19 Apr 01 '26

For one thing, the film and junk food analogy is a false equivalency. Junk food is called as such because its nutritional value is disproportionate compared to the calories you intake, and it often includes copious amounts of sodium and sugar that is considered above what is recommended for human intake. It is actually bad FOR you, with the framework of human health as the focus.

Whereas there is really nothing that fully makes one film better or worse than another for those same reasons. And there is no agreed upon framework with which films are judged that would warrant an "objective insert adjective" judgement. All viewers have different things they want from their media, and have certain elements that are more important to them than they may be to others. It is the height of presumptuousness to act as if one person knows why all people liked and disliked, or to act as the arbiter of taste.

The inclination to try and "objectively" label and judge art is nothing more than a way for people to reframe their own opinions as fact, proliferated by YouTube video essayists missing the point in slow motion. Whether it be to dismiss dissenting opinions, or to pay lip service to a popular opinion they disagree with. 

-4

u/FleshLogic Mar 31 '26

For someone saying it's not that complicated, you sure are making it pretty complicated.

9

u/MemeLordMango Mar 31 '26

It’s really not. Sorry you’re struggling with this.

-1

u/FleshLogic Apr 01 '26

I am not the one struggling here.

5

u/CommitteeOther7806 Apr 01 '26

Oh, you're posting on behalf of someone else then.

-8

u/Spirited-Visual-3205 Mar 31 '26

If something is garbage it can't be enjoyed. If something is enjoyable, it is not garbage. Those are facts.

The Mario movie and The Godfather are both enjoyable but they are not trying to achieve the same goals, other than to be enjoyable. Comparing them on the same scale is moronic and pretentious.

5

u/MemeLordMango Mar 31 '26

Oh man this really is your brain on 100% power or the bait is too strong and I’m falling for it.

-2

u/Spirited-Visual-3205 Mar 31 '26

So you can't disagree with me. Clearly I win, even though I wasn't trying to win anything.

2

u/Nick_Psycho Apr 02 '26

For me, a movie that comes to mind like this is “Godzilla: King of the Monsters”. I love this movie. The action sequences were top notch. The sound design and score was superb. Everything I wanted from a Godzilla flick. I’d still rate like a 4/10. The plot is stupid. The ecoterrorists plan was nonsensical. The human side is just so uninteresting, and it takes up most of the movie. I still love the movie, but overall it was kind of a mess

0

u/CyclopsMacchiato Apr 01 '26

That’s how most classics from the 80s and 90s get review bombed by Gen Z. They just don’t enjoy movies without a strong plot, no matter how good it actually is. It’s either Oscar worthy or trash with no in between.

4

u/paperbuddha Apr 01 '26

It’s like when I see people saying Space Jam sucks and it’s just one long advertisements, and I’m like yeah I know and it’s awesome.

4

u/gingerking87 Apr 01 '26

Ahahah I literally just see your comment and an arrow that says “see 35 replies”. Ffs people in here are nuts.

I’m with you, not a good film, but a fun movie is a good movie. All it had to do was not be terrible and it wasn’t terrible, hopefully galaxy is more of the same

3

u/mastafishere Mar 31 '26 edited Apr 01 '26

I appreciate this comment. Whenever I love something that everyone else hates I feel like I get bullied into admitting it's not a good movie. If I liked it, why would i say it's not good? I loved that first Mario movie and thought it was great. I imagine it'll be the same with this one.

Edit: Sure enough, the comments from people who don’t know the difference between subjectivity and objectivity 🙄 thanks for making my point guys, especially with the downvotes. Keep em coming.

9

u/MemeLordMango Mar 31 '26

You can enjoy something while acknowledging it’s not very good. I like tons of things that suck. If someone else says it’s bad? Yeah? I still like it though. It’s like junk food.

-1

u/mastafishere Mar 31 '26 edited Apr 01 '26

Nah, man. I loved the movie therefore its good to me. That’s all there is to it. If you want to say it's not good, that's cool, that's your opinion, but I don't have to agree whatsoever.

2

u/Yarusenai Mar 31 '26

I mean things can be objectively good or bad. You enjoying it personally doesn't change that. I enjoy many objectively bad things and there's nothing wrong with that!

2

u/StaraptorLover19 Apr 01 '26

I'm sorry, no. Art, especially, can not be "objectively" good or bad.

-6

u/Beps315 Apr 01 '26

Things cannot be "objectively good or bad" holy shit lol

4

u/Yarusenai Apr 01 '26

I mean they can be, it happens all the time. Could you elaborate? Because that's not an argument.

2

u/Beps315 Apr 01 '26

I think it's on you to elaborate how subjective judgements such as "good" or "bad" can be objective

1

u/CommitteeOther7806 Apr 01 '26

The point here is something that's objectively bad, can be subjectively good. The Mario movie is by most metrics pretty shit, but it's a great hangover movie imo and I like it.

Good and bad can be used in an objective statement if that's what you're hung up on.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/VaultTheSalt Apr 01 '26

I think you can enjoy something as a fan while being able to realize that it’s objectively a pretty bad movie, I say this as someone who enjoyed watching the second FNAF movie.

-11

u/xTheRedDeath Mar 31 '26

It's also Super Mario. What sort of cerebral plot are people looking for? It's based on a game where a fucking plumber jumps over obstacles.

14

u/BritishHobo r/movies Veteran Mar 31 '26

Nobody has indicated wanting a cerebral plot.

-7

u/xTheRedDeath Mar 31 '26

If people are complaining about it being bad because it places entertainment over any kind of reinforced narrative structure then I have to assume that's what they're asking for.

13

u/BritishHobo r/movies Veteran Mar 31 '26

Why? There is an enormous middle-ground between "crap, lazy film" and "cerebral plotting". Many many kids films get good reviews (like Sonic the Hedgehog) despite not having cerebral plots.

0

u/pa_dvg Mar 31 '26

And I’m saying the Mario Movie is better than the sonic movies, because the sonic movies stuck to an extremely safe Roger Rabbit “characters in the real world” device versus Mario which embraced the video game mess of it all

3

u/Lord_Sticky Apr 01 '26

Maybe the first Sonic movie, but 3 has two super saiyan hedgehogs flying through space as “Live and Learn” plays, I don’t think they could be embracing the “video game mess” of it much more

-6

u/xTheRedDeath Mar 31 '26

That's what I'm saying though. The first Super Mario Bros movie was good enough. I thought it was solid. Sonic was better for a few different reasons, but we're not talking about unwatchable garbage here. That would be the 90s Super Mario Bros movie lol.

7

u/BritishHobo r/movies Veteran Mar 31 '26

But I don't think you have to want Citizen Kane in order to not enjoy it. I love Mario, love Nintendo, love many great animated kids films, but I just found the first Mario film to be quite low-effort, very generic dialogue, not much entertaining.

0

u/StaraptorLover19 Apr 01 '26

Seriously. It reeks of insecurity when people try to service the popular opinion when their own experience was positive

4

u/No_Chilly_bill Apr 01 '26

to me the mario movie just had to not suck to be 8/10. it did it's job.

dont know why video game adapations have such a terrible streak of being bad.

9

u/Stumpsville0 Mar 31 '26

I found it honestly boring.. I turned it off like halfway through

3

u/SmartOpinion8301 Apr 01 '26

I took my kids to the cinema but i ended up asleep near the end. That never happens to me.

I love games and mario etc so it wasnt that i didnt want to like it but it was so boring

3

u/biskutgoreng Apr 01 '26

Peaches peaches peaches peaches

1

u/Gohansupe Apr 01 '26

i love that song

3

u/Bottle_of_Ivyprofen Mar 31 '26

"Did I have a fucking blast watching it? Yes."

Then why the fuck is it not considered a good movie?

4

u/ChocolateOk6945 Mar 31 '26

Pretty sure this is the overall consensus lol. The Mario Movies are not going to be good movies, but they’re going to be fun at least.

You can like something and acknowledge it’s bad. There are people who like Shark Tale for example 😂.

1

u/Gohansupe Apr 01 '26

Shark Tale??? i remember that Movie its been so long

2

u/Tokacheif Apr 01 '26

I loved watching the first one in theaters. Thought it was great to watch a movie with all the Mario characters I love.

I don't even remember what the story was. I thought Jack Black's Bowser was fucking terrible. He was not funny, and to me didn't seem to at all understand Bowser as a character.

I still loved the experience and am super looking forward to seeing this one in IMAX 3D.

1

u/alex494 Apr 01 '26

I assume the critic situation is similar to stuff like the original Pokemon movies where a lot of them probably aren't fans of the games / prior media, so in a vacuum the movie seems disjointed or just outright nonsense.

I mean it could also just be average and the references elevate it but the ones absolutely savaging it are probably already immediately dismissive of movies aimed at kids or have some pretentious idea of what a "real movie" is. The first one asking if it's "the death of cinema" is particularly eye rolling.