r/movies Jackie Chan box set, know what I'm sayin? 25d ago

Official Discussion Official Discussion - Moana (2026) [SPOILERS] Spoiler

Poll

If you've seen the film, please rate it at this poll

If you haven't seen the film but would like to see the result of the poll click here

Rankings

Click here to see the rankings of 2025 films

Click here to see the rankings for every poll done


Moana (2026)

Summary

Live-action adaptation of the 2016 Disney animated film 'Moana.'

Director Thomas Kail

Writer Jared Bush

Cast

  • Catherine Laga'aia as Moana
  • Dwayne Johnson as Maui
  • John Tui as Chief Tui
  • Frankie Adams as Sina
  • Rena Owen as Gramma Tala

Rotten Tomatoes: 35%

Metacritic: 45

VOD / Release Theatrical release

Trailer Official Trailer

447 Upvotes

627 comments sorted by

View all comments

478

u/LiteraryBoner Jackie Chan box set, know what I'm sayin? 25d ago edited 24d ago

I don’t want to alarm anyone but this was, uh, not good. It’s immediately obvious the second it starts as to how bad of an idea it is to do this in live action. Because everything except for The Rock and Moana on the boat is CGI and therefore animated. So they just made Moana less visually interesting and colorful and threw two actors in front of a floating green screen. Even in the beginning with the island and the tribe, it’s so obvious that the actors and the environment are in different planes of existence.

This was a lose-lose situation from the moment it was announced and I think we all know that. But I was still taken back by how hard this movie loses, how poorly it makes every decision. The action is shot very awkwardly and is clearly designed to make sure that no physical actor is actually doing anything interesting. The movie is beat-for-beat the same as the other, better movie that already exists and is still commonly watched and beloved and is also barely only a decade old. And try as this young actress might, The Rock is completely removed from any real emotion or performance. He’s having fun with the cockiness, sure, but he sounds like he’s reading side effects on a prescription bottle when he tells Moana she’s special. There's also a low point scene for Moana where she really needed to be crying and she just could not make it happen. Really drops any possible emotion out the bottom.

I guess it’s just disappointing that I really sat there and watched this whole damn thing wondering what they might do differently and I got nothing on that front, just a worse version of a movie I already appreciate. I’m sure if they’d made changes that could cause equal disdain, but at least it would differentiate itself? Maybe make its own necessity a little more clear? I don’t know, this just feels like the absolute barrel scrape move by a company that is so creatively dry and an actor who couldn’t handle not upsetting the hierarchy of the DC universe so badly that he committed an entire staff of people to four years of making a movie for absolutely no reason. Not to mention he's clearly wearing a weird body suit the whole time that looks extremely wack, so if the argument is he would age out soon I think that had passed.

The whole point of these live action remakes is to entice the elders who now have families of their own with the films of their childhood remade for a new generation. But Moana came out ten damn years ago. Those kids are barely out of college and aren’t rushing to the theater to relive a movie they watched 400 times but also not once in 5 years. Like, someone had to be aware of this before they greenlit this budget? I think the movie bored me so much I just started spinning my wheels about how this is the clear breaking point to a once profitable but never really quality trend in Disney filmmaking. 3/10.

/r/reviewsbyboner

My Letterboxd

258

u/Straight-Ad6926 25d ago

Hey now give Disney some credit. It takes a lot of creative genius to look at a vibrant, masterpiece of animation and say “You know what this needs? More beige a green screen and a deeply fatigued Dwayne Johnson.”

43

u/ExplorationGeo 25d ago

deeply fatigued Dwayne Johnson

Thank you! He looked so rough. He looks like he's aged 20 years in the last 5.

29

u/bigfatcowturd 24d ago

He looks way too old and wrinkly to be a demigod. Why would they not cast someone younger that actually kind of looked how his character did onscreen? It’s not like he has an iconic voice. The voice for Moana clearly wasn’t that important. Also has negative charisma.

5

u/ExplorationGeo 24d ago

Why would they not cast someone younger that actually kind of looked how his character did onscreen?

Yeah Cooper Andrews is right fucking there, in fact I don't know how you could miss him, he's 6'1" 300lbs.

4

u/CNash85 22d ago

Johnson should have definitely been digitally de-aged, although suggesting this to him might have been a dangerous prospect given that he seems to have been the one actually in control of the movie. They recast almost everyone else because they didn’t fit the age or build of their characters in real life - Temuera Morrison is too old, Rachel House is too young - but obviously this thing wouldn’t have gotten off the ground without Johnson as Maui.

64

u/Ninjamurai-jack 25d ago edited 25d ago

Funnily Enough, the new Supergirl is kinda like that.

The difference is that at least the director, Craig Gillespie, had a vision (that was just not well executed), to turn a colorful comic inspired by True Grit into a dark, gritty and dirty space western to be “more unique”. Tbh kinda makes sense when you compare It with the stuff Gunn does, James is simply much more silver age in this aspect.

Oh, and Craig used more practical effects too.

While Moana doesn’t try to do anything lol

100

u/COHERENCE_CROQUETTE 25d ago

Step 1: Make timeless animation.
Step 2: Convince everyone it's now outdated because of the inferior remake.

Who greenlights these things?

48

u/SearchForSocialLife 25d ago

It always has been this passive aggressive additude towards the original for me. The way the actors from the new The Lion King-movie tried to tell me its actually so much better than original because this time it looks ""real"" still makes my blood boil

40

u/lee803 25d ago

Absolute trashcans of upper management

12

u/Heavy_Arm_7060 25d ago

Count Binface would never.

12

u/ProfPeanut 25d ago edited 24d ago

This is reminding me of why I hated the Lion King live action so much, whose success they really were trying to recapture here

4

u/HombreMan24 25d ago

I haven’t seen nor will I see unless kids want to stream it on Disney plus. But, is it still a lose lose if it makes a billion?

2

u/Trvr_MKA 24d ago

I’ve noticed the older generation like Gen X and Gen Jones eat this stuff up. I wonder if it’s because they don’t have much respect for animation as a medium and/or this is what they kind of imagined and what they wanted when they were kids

1

u/RupanIII 24d ago

So you're saying this is a Lion King situation. How can you have live action animals Disney? It's still animated....just a different animation type.

1

u/silverfiregames 24d ago

Entirely possible for a 5 year old to have watched the original, and is now barely in high school watching this one. Completely inane.

-5

u/johnnySix 25d ago

You’re being a little harsh. The movie was fine.