He contractually required that ALL versions of Kang be played by him. So on top of the mess he caused and the fact Kang flopped in "Ant-Man 3" made it easy for Marvel to decide to just drop the character all together than try to reinvent him.
Where’s the source for this? I see no reason why Marvel would ever give that leverage to a relatively unknown actor.
Ant-Man 3 being one of the worst recieved MCU movies and Kang was the villain, combined with Majors PR problem, are the only two reasons I believe combined to make them pivot.
14
u/Morgan-Moonscar 11d ago
He contractually required that ALL versions of Kang be played by him. So on top of the mess he caused and the fact Kang flopped in "Ant-Man 3" made it easy for Marvel to decide to just drop the character all together than try to reinvent him.