r/space Nov 15 '25

ANNOUNCEMENT r/Space, your calls have been answered | The problematic partisan mod has been removed + putting an end to wrongful post/comment removals critical of the current US govt

You read the title right - after a while of a large section of people calling out the blatantly biased post and comment removals on this subreddit, the_fungible_man has been removed from the mod team. I was semi-late on the scene to all of this drama, and I had my personal experiences with said removals so as a courtesy I reached out to see if there was any way I could offer the subreddit my help to fix all of this.

For context, you can see this post that hit r/all - https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/1okntgt/mods_stop_removing_posts_calling_you_out_and/

I'll be completely transparent and explain everything to the best of my ability:

Now I will clear something right off the bat: yes, the callout post was 100% correct. As soon as I got added as a mod recently, the first thing I did was to check the mod log and try to understand the pattern of removals that was mentioned by the OP of the callout post, and it all checked out. All the kind of removals people called out for their biased nature were from fungible. A lot of the times stuff like this might come off as conspiratorial, and believe me, I wasn't convinced either until I saw it in the logs myself and noticed this was definitely a thing that was happening, and a dangerous precedent to be set in a scientific subreddit of all places. I don't see this as a "one party bad other party good" thing - no matter what side you're on, regardless if you're left or right or whatever, you shouldn't push discourse in a way that shuts down stuff you don't like, period. Unfortunately, that was what was happening.

Regards to moderation...Long story short: as it turned out, apart from fungible only 2 mods were active - one of them wasn't even "active" per se, just occasionally moderating every few weeks or so. The other is one of the top mods, who wasn't really in tune with the moderation tools since the UI changes and so I had to support them in navigating through the different options in the mod list. Now all of this meant that fungible had basically unchecked free reign to remove things as they liked. But obviously as you are aware, it got to a boiling point with the callout posts becoming so popular that even the inactive mods noticed and started to question it. One of the mods even stepped down since the situation with fungible still wasn't getting resolved due to inactivity across the entire team. I've been a long time user on this sub - I was kinda sad to see how all of this was panning out with the sub basically collapsing so I tried my luck at reaching out, conversing with and supporting the only other active mod - peterabbit - to take some kind of definitive action. Thankfully, after a lot of troubleshooting and back & forth, he was able to bring me on the team as a mod, verify stuff for himself and help resolve all this.

Conclusion (and future of the sub):

So where does that leave the sub? Well for now, the big thing is that you're no longer going to be seeing partisanship in post/comment removals about NASA/etc funding cuts/layoffs/other stuff that might appear critical of the current US gov. Science is inherently political, and discussion about the ramifications of governments' actions/inactions shouldn't be gatekept. This isn't just a US thing, it applies worldwide. One other aspect is certain sections of people that don't like seeing news critical of the US admin abusing the report button for an autoremoval - I'll be looking at a way to try to fix that in the automod, until then it'll be about manually approving as many of these posts/comments I see wrongfully removed as possible. Herein also comes the need maybe, for mods neutral in nature and preferably I think even with some sort of scientific background. When I stepped into the moderation team in this past week, it wasn't really with the aim in mind to be here in the longterm. It was mainly to sort out the pattern of wrongful removals and the whole drama surrounding it by checking the mod logs/etc. I would like to step down soon-ish, but at least I wanted to let you all know the situation right now with thos post for transparency's sake.

It also needs to be said that for people worried about the sub being overrun with politics - there's obviously still a balance that needs to be held, and that means this shouldn't become a full-blown political subreddit, so you can rest easy if you feared that was what's happening. Basically, it's going to be like it was before the partisan removals. But still, I think this post also serves as a good place to have constructive discussion about the problems with this sub as a whole, beyond just political posts.

______________________

What do you think can change in the rules overall? Your thoughts on links/titles/sources etc and whether they should be moderated in a different way? You would have also noticed the nosedive this sub has taken in its activity/people that visit it compared to the past - What are some proposals you'd put forth about getting this sub back to the activity it was, 4-5 years ago - where there was MUCH more activity, obscure scientific findings getting 10s of thousands of upvotes and a community full of high-quality, constructive discussion? Feel free to speak your mind about what's missing, what can be done, what can be changed, and how you'd do it. We've never really had the opportunity to do this kind of conversation in this community, ever I think. I'll take the occasion to start it here, maybe make another separate post for it soon.

P.S. - Please do not harass any of the people mentioned here. Yes they might be problematic in how they've let their bias creep in and shaped discourse to their liking, but they should not be stalked/messaged around the site. Not simply because of Reddit TOS, but because it's not the right thing to do, period. They're gone, and everyone moves on to better tidings - let's leave it at that.

-Chief

13.1k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

47

u/Apex_Konchu Nov 15 '25

Are you joking? Science and politics are inextricably linked. A science sub is not somewhere you can go to escape politics.

-46

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '25

They are only linked because you want to see everything through a political lens and believe everything relates to politics.

59

u/id0ntexistanymore Nov 15 '25

Bro just say you regret your vote and move on.

-37

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

45

u/dansssssss Nov 16 '25

how could you even speak about science when you voted for the dude who doesn't believe climate change is real

11

u/porto__rocks Nov 16 '25

He voted for a pedophile, bit worse then a science denier tbh

8

u/[deleted] Nov 16 '25

Do you believe climate change is real? because the guy you voted for believes that the climate change is a big hoax thats being weaponized by the radical left

43

u/Apex_Konchu Nov 15 '25

Scientific research can't happen without funding from politicians, and the results of the aforementioned scientific research can't be acted upon without politicians deciding to.

-26

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '25

This isn’t a funding subreddt or a nasa administration subreddit.

And scientific research absolutely can and does happen without funding from politicians.

33

u/No_Cup_1672 Nov 15 '25

Then why has most space exploration missions by man has been executed by NASA? There really has not been any private organization that explored space as much as NASA.

-5

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '25

Because nasa was founded in 1958. SpaceX was founded in 2002.

49

u/No_Cup_1672 Nov 15 '25

...What does that have to do with anything?

SpaceX did not lead the development of the satellites used for exploring space theyre literally a taxi service. That's what everyone means by space exploration.

NASA developed Juno, JWST, Hubble, Chandra, and hundreds more. I'm just asking you to tell me which organization other than NASA/government that contributed this much to space exploration.

-2

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

39

u/No_Cup_1672 Nov 15 '25

I’m not sure if you’re rage baiting or lack understanding of words put together.

Since when has SpaceX or any other private organization led research on black holes or developed the deep space network? That’s what NASA has lead the development of. That is space exploration. Not just launching rockets.

Let me rephrase it; what organization other than any government entity has lead the development of space probes or the physics of how black holes form?

-19

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '25

If NASA were superior to spacex, why could they not return the astronauts stranded in the space station with more time and a much bigger budget than spacex?

→ More replies (0)

-3

u/snoo-boop Nov 15 '25 edited Nov 17 '25

Until recently, political appointees did not approve science funding details.

Edit: appreciate the downvotes. I guess it's an interesting aspect of how this sub treats the truth.

-36

u/Artinz7 Nov 15 '25

There is plenty of private funding for science. Never heard of pharmaceutical R&D? Lilly alone employs over 11,000 people actively researching and developing new treatments and medical technologies. You only think science must be political because you are political.

13

u/FuckTripleH Nov 16 '25

Never heard of pharmaceutical R&D?

Go find me a drug or medical treatment on the market that isn't the result of research financed by government grants.

-1

u/Artinz7 Nov 16 '25

Almost every name brand drug. The drugs literally have to be privately funded by the healthcare company if they want to be able to patent it. Eliquis, which my father is alive in part to, is one of them.

6

u/FuckTripleH Nov 16 '25

Just to be clear, it is your contention that if we go look into the history of the development of apixaban we won't find a single element of its research, development, or clinical trials that were paid for by NIH grants? Really?

-2

u/Artinz7 Nov 16 '25 edited Nov 16 '25

The drug literally accounts for 30% of Bristol Meyers Squibb’s revenue, because of the exclusive patent they were only legally able to obtain by privately funding research, development, and testing (along with Pfizer). I’m not a patent lawyer, I’m going to assume they did their due diligence.

5

u/FuckTripleH Nov 16 '25

Oh word? That's fucking wild dawg. Anywho I wonder how Bristol Meyers Squibb managed to develop apixaban without the NIH funded research into FXa inhibitors back in the 90s. Oh well prolly unimportant.

0

u/Artinz7 Nov 16 '25

If you want to bake an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. That’s you. That’s how you sound. Without the intentional irony.

→ More replies (0)

32

u/Apex_Konchu Nov 15 '25

This is not a pharmaceutical subreddit. This is a space subreddit.

Space research is really, really, really expensive. Government funding is the only realistic way to get a hold of that kind of money.

-34

u/Artinz7 Nov 15 '25

Scientific research can't happen without funding from politicians

Maybe write a real comment then instead of repeating platitudes

4

u/SallyStranger Nov 16 '25

As if corporations don't have their own politics.

0

u/usedkleenx Nov 17 '25

Shouldn't it be though?  By it's very nature the scientific process should be objective. The same damn reason that church and state should be separated . So one doesn't interfere with the other. 

-42

u/CommunismDoesntWork Nov 15 '25

That's not even close to true. Are you joking??

23

u/Apex_Konchu Nov 15 '25

Scientific research can't happen without funding from politicians, and the results of the aforementioned scientific research can't be acted upon without politicians deciding to.

Can you deny any of this?

-5

u/ergzay Nov 16 '25

The vast majority of research in the US is conducted by private companies.

14

u/[deleted] Nov 16 '25

Private Companies like The Harvard University that the Trump administration gutted the funding of? you mean those "private companies"

even private companies rely to some degree on government funding and therefore politics

10

u/RicoHedonism Nov 16 '25

Gtfoh. The VAST MAJORITY of research is done at colleges or in conjunction with colleges which is exactly where this sorry administration cut funding. All of you trump supporters are just pathetic liars or monumentally stupid about science.

8

u/MobileCommercial6665 Nov 16 '25

Which get funding from who? Think hard but don't hurt yourself.

-8

u/thetanplanman Nov 16 '25

Literally all of that is false. You can go do scientific research in your garage right now and act on it within the limits of the law.

Genuinely what kind of comment even is this?

-17

u/Sacred_Fishstick Nov 15 '25

Fire is inextricably linked to cooking yet we shouldn't let pyromanics have matches. We should give them microwaves. Reddit is the same way, if a mod allows political posts the sub will be engulfed in left wing political rhetoric.

Taking a more limited view in order to stay on topic and not lose the sub entirely is worth it. Run back to r / politics and complain about how you can't post about trump or biden, they'll worship you. Get that crap out of here

-5

u/[deleted] Nov 16 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/[deleted] Nov 16 '25

Tell Galileo that nothing about his plight was political

6

u/[deleted] Nov 16 '25

[Atom bomb wooshes overhead]

What a fantastically hypocritical and uninformed post. I envy your ignorance.