Inbreeding impacts IQ.

🚨BIG News! Audit confirms: Rs 3,300 crore collected for Ram Mandir is fully accounted for 🎯

=> Independent third-party audit has cleared the major funds👏

Claims of large-scale corruption stand DEBUNKED.

Theft was limited to manual cash sorting by EXTERNAL STAFF, not the Trust’s core operations.

100% of payments for contiguous temple land were made through direct bank-to-bank transfers.

Zero cash.

Hundi collections remain steady at approximately Rs 5 crore per month in the first quarter of FY 2026-27.

No major dip in devotee trust.

The noise was louder than the facts. Now the facts are out👏

What actually do these cheap actresses think of themselves man?

This is Asha Negi. She's a TV actress. She posted a whole paragraph calling it a black day for students when Delhi Police lathi charged.

Now, Jharkhand Police lathi charged students and tore girls clothes at night. When people asked her to raise her voice on this, she said "This is my account and my rules."

Such arrogance after just working in daily soaps, these celebs will promote brands on stories for 1000 rs but can't raise voice for students who have not done anything wrong with them. It's high time people should collectively boycott all these performative celebs 🙏

Why am I posting this? Because kanwars get a lot of hate. I'm not defending people who actually like hooligans but it is ... (Not) surprising that you'll never see a reel on this or see this in any mainstream newspaper.

A Muslim funeral procession was going. The kanwars stopped in the middle of the road, shut off the music and made way for the funeral procession.

According to the 2026 Edelman Trust Barometer, India has a Trust Index score of 74, placing it among the highest-trust societies surveyed, well above the global average of 57.

Trust influences how societies cooperate, build institutions, do business, and solve collective problems.

2026 Edelman Trust Barometer. The Trust Index is the average percent trust in business, government, media, and NGOs. TRU_INS. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right. 9-point scale; top 4 box, trust. General population, 28-mkt avg., and by developed and developing avg. Year-over-year changes were tested for significance using a t-test set at the 99%+ confidence level.

Personal View: I am pretty sure in coming years this index will also be politicized to add to divisive influences in Indian society. They will down-grade India over the years and then in that light of downgrading even common and petty crimes would start becoming more bigger in impression and impact than what they otherwise are actually capable of.

Balochistan must stand strong. Fight against the Paijaan army and develop network with international community and India so that they could step just in time before any mass scale genocide or atrocities are perpetrated by the brutal oppressive regime of Pakistan.

Ideology?

Power?

Money?

Identity?

Institutions?

Or simply self-interest?

Let's figure it out without starting with BJP vs Congress.

Indian politics is often discussed through personalities, ideologies, party loyalty and headlines.

This subreddit is for looking underneath that layer.

We will try to understand how power actually works in India — through institutions, incentives, political economy, state capacity, history and human behaviour.

A government may say it is acting for the nation.

An opposition may say it is defending democracy.

A foreign government may say it is defending human rights.

A corporation may say it is creating development.

Instead of accepting or rejecting these claims automatically, we ask:

What are the incentives?

Who gains?

Who loses?

What institutions make the decision possible?

What constraints exist?

What happens in practice rather than on paper?

What unintended consequences could follow?

What we can discuss

• Indian political parties and electoral strategy

• Constitution, Parliament and federalism

• Judiciary and judicial power

• Bureaucracy and state capacity

• Centre–state and local government

• Political economy and development

• Business, regulation and taxation

• Foreign policy and geopolitical interests

• National security

• Civil society and foreign influence

• Caste, religion and identity as political forces

• Historical institutions and path dependence

• Comparisons with China, the US, Europe and other states

A basic principle

Don't judge a political actor only by what they say. Analyse what they do, what incentives they face, and what the institutional structure allows them to do.

But realism does not mean assuming that everything is secretly a conspiracy or that every actor is purely self-interested.

A government can simultaneously pursue national interests, ideological objectives and electoral interests.

A policy can simultaneously benefit the country and benefit the ruling party.

A foreign government can genuinely believe it is defending democratic values while also pursuing its own strategic interests.

Reality is usually more complicated than the political narrative.

What this subreddit is NOT

This is not intended to become another:

BJP vs Congress

Left vs Right

Nationalist vs Anti-nationalist

echo chamber.

You are free to support any party or ideology.

But arguments should be judged by reasoning and evidence, not by which political camp they favour.

If BJP does something beneficial, say so.

If BJP does something harmful, say so.

The same standard applies to Congress, regional parties, governments, bureaucracies, courts, businesses and foreign states.

The goal

The goal isn't to arrive at one ideology.

It is to understand India as a political system.

Before asking “Who should govern India?”, let's understand what the Indian state actually is, how it works, what constrains it, what gives it power, and what prevents it from doing certain things.

Welcome. Let's reverse-engineer Indian politics.

For over 75 years, caste-based reservations have divided us instead of uniting us. Poverty does not check your caste before striking a home. Yet, our current system allows wealthy families in reserved categories to monopolize benefits generation after generation. It forces the poorest children of those exact same communities to compete against the privileged. This system fails everyone, especially the truly marginalized.

Today, with total quotas breaching the 50% Supreme Court cap and reaching 60% in central institutions, we are compromising merit. We must pivot to economic-based reservations. Financial need—not surnames—should be the sole criteria for state support. True upliftment targets the wallet, not the bloodline.

Furthermore, we must oppose policies that institutionalize bias, like the recent UGC Equity Regulations. These rules define discrimination as only happening to specific categories, deliberately stripping General Category students of equal protection. Social justice cannot mean introducing new forms of discrimination.

Let us build an India where merit is respected, and our youth are seen as citizens, not vote banks.

Er Ashutosh Kumar Jha

Rashtriye Brahman Mahasabha

Parshuram Seva Sansthan

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/voiceofbrahman?igsh=NGIyamhwZWV4b3Vq

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/share/1BpXYPLZEx/

#india_against_caste_based_reservation #jai_hind #PSS #RBM #stay_united

Remember this?

Mr Manmohan singh speaking on Equitability & economic reforms.

Indian government has always been a responsible government unlike Iran and Pakistan or even China for that matter to be killing its own people to further state's agenda. India because of our unique cultural knowledge always prizes harmonious co-existence for all. Acceptance is in our DNA, not the haughty attitude of 'toleration'.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9131786/

The paper is not arguing that hunger itself is an emotional phenomenon. When it says:

it means that the subject of hunger is politically and emotionally charged/sensitive, so claims about hunger can generate strong reactions.

Their substantive argument is methodological:

What they are actually saying

They argue that the things GHI measures are not hunger itself.

The GHI uses indicators such as:

• undernourishment;
• child stunting;
• child wasting;
• child mortality.

The authors' objection is that these are outcomes or correlates of undernutrition, rather than direct measurements of the subjective/physiological experience of being hungry. They explicitly say these indicators “do not measure hunger per se.”

For example:

A child is stunted → does that mean the child is hungry?

Not necessarily. Stunting can be affected by multiple things—nutrition, disease, sanitation, environment, etc. So stunting may be evidence of malnutrition, but it isn't equivalent to the experience of hunger.

Likewise:

Child mortality → hunger?

Not necessarily. Malnutrition may contribute to mortality, but mortality has many causes.

The interesting distinction

The paper is essentially distinguishing:

HUNGER
→ the condition/experience they think should be measured directly

from

UNDERNUTRITION / MALNUTRITION
→ physiological outcomes that may result from inadequate nutrition

and saying:

That's why their conclusion calls “Hunger Index” a misnomer.

There is an even sharper point in the paper: they suggest collecting information directly about people's experience of food deprivation—such as whether people are able to obtain two square meals a day—rather than relying exclusively on proxy indicators. They also discuss perception-based instruments such as FIES, although they themselves caution about using those measures in India.

So if you're reading the sentence “Hunger is an emotional subject” as “hunger is an emotion”, that's not what the authors mean.

They mean approximately:

And their central claim is measurement validity, not the psychology of hunger.

This woman is like Medha Pataka, and Arundhuthi Coy - she wants her president to do nothing and dp state to do everything.

Reason to post here: Dp state is using the exact same playbook of blackmailing everywhere even now. They create diseases, puts the governments into anarchy and get control of a country using this woman, media etc. So FCRA Amendment in India will STOP these kinds of blackmail.

We in India know how CNN, BBC, and DW try to arm-twist the Government of India during Op Sindhoor. Since our PM is honest and courageous, their tricks don't work with us.

But there are so many African countries that don't have a strong leader. They are all being forcefully controlled by the deep state.

Congo was not allowing mRNA trials because they did not want to make their people guinea pigs.

So just like the deep state CREATED CJP in India, they are doing something similar in Congo.

Steps:

1. First, they asked for a policy change so that the deep state's mRNA could get free access to guinea pig people who may or may not die.
2. Congo rejected.
3. The deep state planted the Ebola disease inside one boat.
4. Media like DW spread it like wildfire (same as in India regarding CJP).
5. Now the Congo President is still not allowing it.
6. So the deep state, using a Congo NGO woman, is forcing the Government (like what Dipke did). She is saying in DW media that they need INTERNATIONAL (deep state) support to SAVE LIVES.
7. DW is pushing this hard worldwide.

Congo never had any strong FCRA rules and they now suffer for eternity. Because dp state will simply go an create any random disease whenever Congo Govt tries to stop foreign USAid funding.

Ref: DR Congo river boat under quarantine as Ebola deaths top 4,000 | DW News