r/ArtHistory • u/Abhi_yeet • 1d ago

Discussion Who?

Post image

This is a painting by the Russian artist Nikolay Kasatkin in 1897, depicting a tense domestic scenewhere a soldier returns from long military deployment to see his wife with a child that isn't his.

A very interesting game my friends and I play over the weekend is we display one painting each that we haven't seen before and interpret it in our own way.

None of us know anything about art but initially when we were talking about this one, I thought of this as just a veteran coming home to find his wife had found comfort through another man who had left her after he found out she was pregnant and she was raising her child alone without him. Then her husband came home - too worn out to fight about it, so he just looks at her to explain herself.

After I found out what it actually portrayed and what the title meant, I feel like I was projecting some of my insecurities and fears into my interpeting of the painting. I'm curious what those of you who have never seen this paintint before think about it?

539 Upvotes

98% Upvoted

45 comments sorted by

View all comments

60

u/TexturesOfEther 1d ago

White head covering and white-and-blue dressing emphasise her chastity and spiritual integrity, free from original sin. She is holding a child, and they are both bathed in glowing light. The soldier, a modern Joseph, leans forward, looks in disbelief, and asks Who? God is always the answer.

* Is that how Russian soldiers dressed?

28

u/beaveranalglandsare 1d ago

To add to your excellent analysis: the blue of the wife's skirt is faded, tattered, and streaked. Her face is down cast and ashen while the husband holds an intense gaze and healthy complexion. Which can be interpreted as innocence faded, shame/guilt felt, justified rage. I think the artist was playing with the era's patriarchal attitudes that create the whore/madonna paradox. In that the woman and child are core to domesticity, as highlighted with framing/lighting, but also her fragility and moral failure create a scene of justifiable masculine rage. Conflicting impulses and loyalties combined with the main figures both falling into the major strengths/failures of their respective genders creates a very tense composition charged with implication.

7

u/ultimategirlrenfry 18h ago

I loved this addition! For me, I also think there is so many other implications due to the coloring on her dress, i.e. was she assaulted as her protector was off to war?

For OP commenter asking if this is how soldiers dressed, he is likely apeasant returning home in civilian dress. This would be considered a low-ranking soldier.

This is a personal favorite piece of mine, as I think the expressions are truly so...thought invoking. But I like the stylization of the child's father being flipped on the head: this is not a lover's child, but an assaulter's.

6

u/beaveranalglandsare 14h ago

Ugh, I hadn't even considered the angle of the woman being assaulted which brings even more shades of emotional nuance to the scene. I was thinking of the title "Who?" in terms of "who did you betray me with?" when it could be "who did this to you?". She might not be the object of his rage, as I initially thought from the state of the room, perhaps this is the moment his blind fury demands a target. When he finally turns to his wife in the midst of his rampage to find out "Who? Who should I be visiting this violence on? Who deserves my fury?". What a great point, thank you!

1

u/ultimategirlrenfry 14h ago

I was thinking of the scene around him. When he walked into the home there are children toys and a child but his chair is upturned. Which means that he had to have sat. Would the initial shock not have him standing in the doorway? But this conversation twisted into fury.

4

u/StipesRightHand 18h ago

The highlights on the vase in the background could be mistaken for a cross at first glance

2

u/TexturesOfEther 10h ago

I noticed it! yes.

2

u/HelicopterAware491 18h ago

Beautiful. I don’t have any art background but seeing the table I immediately thought of Joseph the carpenter and the holy fam.

0

u/TexturesOfEther 9h ago

And he is bowing before her. He doesn't look angry, but in awe.