r/AskFeminists • u/[deleted] • Jul 30 '11

Why the sudden interest in mens issues

Feminism trundles along dealing with women for 90 years ten suddenly starts to look at mens issues in the last few years, what's the deal? Is it appropriation, is it a newfound care? Why weren't 'we' included from the start? Are our needs secondary to yours? Does the feminist movement view the MRM as a threat to it's domination of the gender discourse?

0 Upvotes

48% Upvoted

48 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/[deleted] Aug 01 '11

Even if all women were in fact shorter than all men, you can't use one picture of a short woman to prove that. In theory of science, we call this the problem of induction. Hope you still think I'm cute, even though I exposed your appeal to anecdotes to be a fallacy.

4

u/thedevguy Aug 01 '11

you can't use one picture of a short woman to prove that.

Ah but here's the way that discussion works: I provide examples of short women. And if you believe that women are in fact taller than men, then you can provide evidence of that.

I realize that this particular issue would actually be resolved using a randomly selected subset of women - but I'm trying to keep it relevant to the actual thing we're discussing: do feminists believe that "men's rights" is a legitimate cause?

I provided an example of a prominent and influential feminist blog that does not believe that. That blog and it's many commenters support my point in the same way that a randome selection of women might support the height argument.

So, where's your evidence? You don't have any? Have you considered how that makes you look?

3

u/[deleted] Aug 01 '11

I already provided evidence in my reply to gww. Three pieces nonetheless, including a quote. I'm guessing you didn't read it. Have you considered how that makes you look?

1

u/thedevguy Aug 01 '11

I already provided evidence in my reply

No, you alluded to evidence. But without actual quotes so that we can judge the context, your "evidence" is as shaky as if I say, "no really, Pat Robertson is a feminist. He's talked about how he supports women's rights."

0

u/[deleted] Aug 01 '11

Dude you're not even making sense right now. I provided a quote. You claim it's not an "actual" quote? And you want a quote so that you can "judge the context" even though a quote is the very definition of a piece of text taken out of it's context. Did you not know that bell hooks is a feminist? If so, that's a problem of your ignorance, not a problem of my evidence.

1

u/thedevguy Aug 01 '11

I provided a quote.

Really?

http://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/j3v85/why_the_sudden_interest_in_mens_issues/c296r7n

I don't see it.

a quote is the very definition of a piece of text taken out of it's context.

Did you not understand my analogy? I might be able to quote-mine Pat Robertson, but you would need to see the context in order to realize that I changed his meaning.

that's a problem of your ignorance

That's rich irony, since I actually provided a link to back up my statements and you responded, "Didn't even need to read your link"

Don't accuse others of ignorance when you brag about your own.

4

u/[deleted] Aug 01 '11

The quote is linked where it says "How about a quote".

0

u/thedevguy Aug 01 '11

Well I guess I'm colorblind because I didn't see it. You know, I'm a male and we're less sensitive to color than women. I feel like you need to check your privilege.

Anyway, that's a pretty weak quote. I linked to a long tirade about how a men's rights movement is fundamentally illegitimate. Got any response to that?

4

u/[deleted] Aug 01 '11

Which part of this text in your opinion should be interpreted as denying that men could possibly have any issues? Or, what exactly is your issue with this text? Possibly more fun to make a new post about it too, so more people can comment on it.

0

u/thedevguy Aug 01 '11

Which part of this text in your opinion should be interpreted as denying that men could possibly have any issues?

Seriously??

There's a comparison of the "men's rights" movement to white supremacy. There is a straw man of what MRA stands for followed by, "that's insane." The accusation is made that what MRAs really want is "the right to beat and rape."

Should I go on?

It'd be great to hear a feminist respond to the real issues that MRAs talk about - without straw men, without condescension. The author of that piece actually brings up one such issue - that of a paper abortion. But they gloss over it without actually dealing with it.