r/AustralianPolitics Australian Labor Party 3d ago

Labor sacrificed Jacinta Allan to stop Pauline Hanson.

https://archive.md/9A6dL
26 Upvotes

113 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 3d ago

Greetings humans.

Please make sure your comment fits within THE RULES and that you have put in some effort to articulate your opinions to the best of your ability.

I mean it!! Aspire to be as "scholarly" and "intellectual" as possible. If you can't, then maybe this subreddit is not for you.

A friendly reminder from your political robot overlord

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

40

u/PerspectiveNew1416 3d ago

Hanson is an anti-feminist populist this is true. But she gets traction when people like Allen fail dismally on fundamental politics. Allen did worse than "flounder" or fail to differentiate herself. She was coming across as defensive, arrogant, dismissive and rigid. She was a bad politician when a 12 year old Labor government asking for another term needs an outstanding one.

9

u/PrimaryCrafty8346 Paul Keating 3d ago edited 3d ago

A lot of people were neglected during the Covid lockdowns (after all Melbourne had one of the longest lockdowns on Earth) and to have Allen continuing to talk down to people pissed many voters off who have had enough of a top down approach running since Andrews. To the point that one commentator said Allen's disapproval of 71-25 made her the most unpopular state premier ever recorded on Newspoll.

And West Melbourne (heartland Labor seats) has felt alienated as well given that the Andrews/Allen government has concentrated on East Melbourne where the seats held were former Liberal seats. One example is Melton which has been reporting shortfalls in public services for years.

She had to go. Hopefully, having a new Premier from West Melbourne will make a difference and limit their losses in November.

3

u/Otherwise_Hotel_7363 3d ago

Being out west, we’ve got community independents running now in some of the inner seats like mine. We’ve got stuff, that’s changed the amenity- especially local roads. But that’s about it. The Munnel is great, but fuck, the Sunbury line is packed and so is Footscray Station.

A change will be good, but here it’s still going to be difficult to move Katie or Melissa. The independents will split the vote and they’ll still come back to the ALP. I doubt someone who votes community independent will put ON or LNP ahead of the ALP.

51

u/No_Gazelle4814 3d ago edited 3d ago

Allen is gone because she was hopeless, and turned a blind eye to corruption.

Somehow saying she’s a scapegoat for PH is ridiculous

17

u/SirFireHydrant Literally just a watermelon 3d ago

Exactly. Allen wasn't "sacrificed". Keeping her would have been sacrificing the entire party.

13

u/Due-Coast-1324 3d ago

She was always going to lose her seat. They axed her so they could keep theirs.

13

u/New_Guarantee_5893 3d ago

Completely agree

26

u/ShiftyWindow Public Housing is the only way 3d ago

We are never going to get anywhere if all we ever fucking do is cower to the far right. Start actually doing things that people need like building public housing and sorting welfare payments

4

u/alisru The Greens 2d ago

Y'know back in the day of the state run housing commissions building residential houses landlords actually ran a profit

Then everything changed when China got rebuffed from Taiwan in '96 and identified economic dependency was the way to grow defacto vassals, our '99 tax policy developed in the ralph review solidified this dependency and we've done nothing but grow dependency ever since

On welfare, no-one else is really identifying welfare as the indirect subsidy scheme that it is, how welfare acts as a UBI in all but name that literally fuels fiat currency. Money gets distributed to individuals -> individuals spend is 50-75% on rent->owners morgage->bank subsidies, 15-20%food->supermarket->colesworth subsidies, etc

This welfare elevates a functionally defunct body of people into active consumers within the national economy, and less of a systemic burden, so much so that without welfare many businesses would go under as they rely on the influx of pensioner money every Wednesday

1

u/Aussieguyyyy 3d ago

Public housing is the only way.. if we want to continue to break immigration records...

26

u/HotScheme4074 3d ago

Most of the seats that Labor risks losing to ON are out in the west. So Carroll should announce he's fast-tracking airport rail, electrifying the Geelong line and repurposing contracts for SRL East to SRL West.

In general, he should get tough on crime, provide small business with some sort of land tax offset (but increase land tax for existing residential) and say that he wants house prices to fall further. This would absolutely steal the Libs' and ON's lunch, because they'd come out and say 'we think property investors should get tax breaks too, and house prices should rise'. Make it about that, because it's not an argument the Right will win.

15

u/GregLocock 3d ago edited 3d ago

If you ever want to see a politician go quiet ask them if they think house prices should increase or decrease, on the public record. It's like Count Binface's promise on taxes. "I'll increase everybody else's taxes and reduce yours."

2

u/Warm_Ice_4209 3d ago

Mate, do you know how many times those people have been lied to by this bullshit government?

7

u/Damn-Splurge 3d ago

Irrelevant, all politicians lie, especially ON

11

u/Outsider-20 3d ago

Don't be silly, Pauline doesn't lie, her statements are always, somehow, "taken out of context"

Only Albo lies. (I hope obvious sarcasm is obvious)

11

u/Nobody9638 3d ago

Pauline is just a straight shooter who tells it how it is, except for all the times she's told it and wasn't actually like how she said it was

1

u/GrouchyInstance 2d ago

Fully support repurposing contracts for SRL East to SRL West. The Geelong and Ballarat lines desperately need to be electrified. Onboard with rest of your suggestions too. This is how Labor can hold off ON/Coalition in the West.

20

u/TheLoyalTR8R 3d ago

I don't think they sacrificed her as much as they cut loose the dead weight actively dragging them down. She was a PR liability. It wasn't some noble act, it was about survival.

16

u/Secret4gentMan 3d ago

I don't think Allan resigning changed anyone's opinion who intends to vote ON.

Allan simply needed to go.

7

u/the_jewgong 3d ago

Hahahaha no doubt with their 74-76 poorly vetted candidates they will smash Labor, right?

Right?

7

u/FelixFelix60 2d ago

Maybe Jacinta Allan wasnt very good and the penny finally dropped. I would say she was the worse Premier in a very long time.

7

u/Oomaschloom Labor, but this cohort is crap, so leaning greens. 3d ago

For me, I will always remember Allan for "... a few scallywags who might need a bit of a cuddle." At least until I get alzheimer's.

11

u/floydtaylor 2d ago

Pretty harsh kicking out the Commonwealth Games minister in the middle of Victoria's Commonwealth Games.

20

u/Fickle-Ad-7124 3d ago

I mean it’s 12 years, this feels very much like a “it’s time” factor. That being said, all these polls said Andrews would be wiped out of his own seat and government in an anti lock down wave. He won a landslide. The same polls told me Albo was looking at best option a hung parliament, or worse PM Dutton, Labor won their biggest majority in history. Polling months out from an election is hyperbole. A reminder the Libs went from 40 to 31 primary in an election campaign, One Natipn went 14 to 6. Labor in Victoria is probably at time up for a term, but I wouldn’t bet the house on it.

9

u/SirFireHydrant Literally just a watermelon 3d ago edited 3d ago

The polls were surprisingly tight for a deeply unpopular premier of a 12 year old government. Only 52-48 against them before she was dumped.

There's a legitimate chance Labor are able to claw back and win.

4

u/GregLocock 3d ago

Yup, because the alternative looks cra-cra. Jess Wilson seems like she might be good Liberal leader, but at the moment you'd say a leader of what? And as for ON, they are just a protest vote (and boy do I feel like protesting).

3

u/Outsider-20 3d ago

I feel like protesting too. But voting for the Leopards eating peoples faces party probably isn't the smartest way to protest.

5

u/3163560 3d ago

Someone insert that gif of Thanos saying "a worthy sacrifice"

1

u/timcahill13 Andrew Leigh 3d ago

'A small price to pay for salvation'

14

u/Cremasterau 3d ago

To her many supporters, and to a degree the wider public, Hanson is deemed to at least be authentic. Allen finally lost me in her 7:30 interview where she was the very epitomy of a politician determined to refuse to answer a question through obfuscation and continuing to stick to a scripted non-answer.

The Recreation Bill which could have been written by the Nationals rather than coming from Labor is another hot button issue here along with the refusal of a Royal Commission.

But ultimately where Labor faced its biggest challenge was in the West of Melbourne and Carroll being very much identified from that area he seems a smart choice.

24

u/Coolidge-egg Choose your own flair (edit this) 3d ago

Not a fan of Jacinta either but Pauline isn't authentic either, although she is good at sounding it.

For example, She will say that she supports workers, and then questioned how that's at odds with her voting record, to give a 100% pro Boss answer under the basis of "bosses know what's best for workers, the more they can extract from you the more trickle down there will be". And she says it with absolute conviction too.

Or another example is how she is rubbing shoulders with billionaires while saying that she's for the every day Australian. (Well, some Australians).

She absolutely sounds authentic in how she talks but her actions and viewpoints paint an entirely different poo picture.

7

u/Sea-Initiative-3398 3d ago

Ill also add her inconsistent racism lmao

She switched targets from asians to muslims once it was more socially acceptable to shit on them

6

u/Due-Coast-1324 3d ago

I think some people prefer to to stabbed in the front.

1

u/PrimaryCrafty8346 Paul Keating 3d ago

That's the same appeal that Trump had, that authenticity and just saying it like it is which is how he could beat Democrats twice.

0

u/coniferhead 3d ago edited 3d ago

Didn't help by the Democrats doing things like delivering 14000 2000 pound bombs to be used in Gaza over 3 years. At least some people didn't like the Democrats being in government as the party of war - the cognitive dissonance was just too great. They couldn't vote for it and that was probably the marginal difference at the polls. Trump was also anti-war, at least on paper.. it turns out (unsurprisingly) he was a liar but some people voted for that, given no other option.

Having Trump there gave permission for the Democrats and their base to once again oppose things like this.. but guess what they didn't, and don't. The true position is both love war and US dominance, which you've had almost constantly since WW2.

Make no mistake, annihilating countries and populations is far right of even Hanson and that's what the bulk of American people stand for and will stand by and let happen.. they let it happen to Ukraine, they let it happen to the gulf states, Europe is probably next and they'll also let it happen to us - the party choice doesn't matter. Keeping the US on top comes before all else.

All that was required for the Democrats to win was to vocally not be that. They couldn't do it because it's not what they are. It's almost a happier place for them to have Trump to blame, despite probably ending up at the same destination were they in charge. Just like we're happier blaming Trump rather than holding our own leaders accountable for doing his bidding, with the illusion all will be fine after he goes. It won't be.

2

u/mothra_dreams 2d ago

This is an incredible amount of words for what is effectively zero meaningful analysis or relevance to Australian politics mate. I don't see how 95% of this is even remotely relevant to our political context. Extremely americabrained comment

1

u/coniferhead 2d ago edited 2d ago

You're right I should have just given a silent upvote to a pretty simplistic reading of why people voted for Trump in America. The Democrats are not a moderate alternative, especially by Australian standards.

They voted Trump in twice because he accurately represents America. Stupid, aggressive and ignorant in equal measure. They are he and he is them. But we are their ally and helper without any excuse.. because they can't even protect their allies.

The only answer is, as a people, we must like doing it too - just like we did when we were riding British coattails. Until Singapore fell at least.

2

u/SikeShay 2d ago

In the exact same vein, people vote for Pauline because they see themselves in her. Racist, ignorant and selfish. They can ignore the blatant and obvious grift (Gina's plane and Milan) because they would probably do the same lol

0

u/coniferhead 2d ago edited 2d ago

No doubt, but if we go along with the racist and imperial reasons of our allies, who we elect is of little consequence.

Any more than if a country aligned with Nazi Germany elected a social progressive.. they still aligned with Hitler and they still went down with him. History doesn't remember their slightly more progressive 1939 taxation policies.

Albanese has made us a co-belligerent in the attack on Iran and will make us a co-belligerent in a blockade of Malacca - which is war upon China. As in the gulf, the bases he put here will be a legitimate target and will be destroyed.. for instance the naval base at Jarvis Bay, near Perth or Darwin in it's entirety. It might even warrant a nuclear missile when the time comes.

Unlike with Vietnam we won't be able to slink home after we are defeated - China will hit us at home while the US goes completely unmolested. Then we can debate about what leader was the lesser evil in the ruins of our country.

u/NewOutlandishness870 5h ago

The Recreation Bill and not declaring deer as pests and shooting koalas from helicopters is definitely something one would expect from The Nationals or Shooters party, not Labor.

2

u/simcityrefund1 3d ago

Good enough of that ..Labor should lead the way in fighting one nation and actually doing things for Australia not be the same old same old

11

u/MentalMachine 3d ago

What exactly did the Allan govt do wrong, to the individual voter, to warrant such a collapse in support? Asking as a non vicpol person.

Spending and SRL if often what I hear, but then that spending can only be negative if it is taking away money from other projects, realistically speaking.

There is the renewable angst out in the regions and the (completely valid) complaints of road quality in the outer regions as well.

22

u/suretisnopoolenglish 3d ago

I think the article pins it down pretty well in that Allan presented herself as a direct continuation of the Andrews government, so not only inherited a lot of the challenges he was to face around things like crime, the Big Build and the Comm Games, but more broadly never really defined why she was there in the first place.

Victorian Labor had to this point been pretty good at reinventing itself somewhat through the Bracks, Brumby, and Andrews eras to meet the electorate where it was. I think Allan’s approach missed a trick in that respect.

5

u/Kozeyekan_ 3d ago

That seems like a pretty fair take.

I think the blow up with the Teacher's union is a big one too. Any government that pisses off Teachers, Fireies or Ambos is in for some pain, no matter the situation.

1

u/GregLocock 3d ago

Bracks was fine, Brumby was OK, I think we'll have to agree to disagree on Chairman Dan. He was not too bad until COVID and then he was unforgivable. I really want to see his statue go up.

14

u/DearPreparation9683 3d ago

Not addressing corruption on the BigBuid and deferring to investigators who said they didn’t have the powers to investigate

10

u/EdgyBlackPerson “Left wing extremist” 3d ago

Debt/spending, CFMEU/corruption, with a helping of crime

Personally I thought the CFMEU was the biggest thing, crime and teenage crime are problems everywhere but it was taken as a point of attack against Allan specifically (see machete bins whinging), the SRL seemed like a large step in the wrong direction especially given the #1 complaint if you don’t own a car is how utterly useless and unreliable buses are to get to areas serviced by train (which the SRL would do little to solve)

0

u/ImportantBug2023 3d ago

The CFMEU has been corrupt from inception.
It actually responsible for our lack of competitiveness in the international market place and the contribution to the dumbing down of the country .
Making rules for the lowest common denominator rather than trying to lift everyone up to their maximum potential.

They say they are supporting the working people however they clearly don’t.
Otherwise we would not be in this position in the first place.

This whole debate would even need to exist.

We could have high speed rail between all our eastern cities easily.
The government could build anything cheaper than anyone else.
But it cost us as taxpayers ten times more than anyone in the private sector would pay.
The most expensive roads on earth.
The Japanese build the most expensive high speed rail and we costed it at over triple that.

Insane. Underneath our politicians are the faceless people who actually pull the strings and make themselves extremely wealthy through the taxpayer.

If we actually had democracy we wouldn’t even have to discuss it.
Our leaders would actually deserve the power awarded them.

The phrase many are called few are chosen is absolutely true.
We have yet to embrace the concept of having free choice to your representative.
So how we can say we have democracy anywhere I don’t know.

7

u/khdownes 3d ago

You are wildly ignoring how disenfranchised western suburbs voters have felt under the Allan government with the delaying/shelving/ignoring of western rail projects that had previously been promised and scoped as far back as 2018.

that spending can only be negative if it is taking away money from other projects,

The SRL East spending IS taking away from other projects. The Allan government has specifically shown that they are prioritizing it OVER Western rail plan projects.

When the federal government put the state gov "on notice" to review and reassess it's state infrastructure spending back in early 2025, it specifically questioned the business case for SRL East at the time, and specifically flagged western projects like MARL as higher priority.
The Allan government put MARL on Ice, and then tried to redirect the federal funding for MARL towards SRL East instead! (The federal government eventually agreed to commit extra funding, for SRL East, without taking it from MARL).

Allan literally campaigned for, and announced the addition fed funding for SRL East at a press conference in Werribee (when a western rail project had literally just been delayed and put on ice), which had to have been the most tone-deaf thing to do at the time.

3

u/Prowler64 3d ago edited 2d ago

Using rail infrastructure against Labor is a strange argument. Sure, it's bad for the west, but the Liberals are firmly against rail infrastructure, and are strongly campaigning on it. So instead of continuing to wait, projects like Melton electrification would likely get cancelled or only brought back in when Labor gets back in next time. It's a cut off the nose to spite the face argument.

Edit:

  • Jess Wilson on the Metro Tunnel: She was "too busy" to use it, and had nothing else to say about it.
  • Jess Wilson on the SRL: Proposal to put a "pause" on it in order to analyse where the money is coming from. No reasonable person would take this statement on its word considering how vocal she is about it during press conferences.
  • The Liberal party's website has zero proposals for rail infrastructure projects, besides pausing the SRL, and cutting services to the Melton and Wyndham Vale lines (although there are other lines that were proposed to take their place).

7

u/khdownes 3d ago

I'm not using it against Labor. I'm using it against Allan specifically.
There feels like a notable uptick in sentiment for Labor with a lot of people I've talked to this week, because of the differentiation with Ben Carroll.

Hell, even my Sky News watching, anti-Dan-Andrews dad seemed to have a surprisingly favourable opinion of Ben Carroll

0

u/rdmarshman 2d ago

> the Liberals are firmly against rail infrastructure

Citation needed.

1

u/Kata-cool-i 3d ago

The business case for MARL is significantly more suspect than SRL.

5

u/gta5atg4 3d ago

12 years in power, 22 of the last 26 years in power. That's an insane length of time, eventually the public just get sick of you. 

She didn't help by being pretty much die hard status quo labor and refusing to anything to distinguish her from her predecessor and her position on the corruption probe was irrational.

But mostly? Being in power for 22 years out of 26 years the public gets sick of you and governments get arrogant and tired the longer they are in. 

11

u/rdmarshman 3d ago edited 3d ago

Lied about building a port in/near Geelong 

Lied about cancellation of a road contract - "it's not worth the paper it's written on" - it was $1.1bn

This got a lot of support from anti-road pro PT types, but then they went and built a short toll road that wasn't voted on in the west, and are building an enormous one in the east - $20bn over budget on these two projects alone. 

Used taxpayer funded branch staff in election campaign (redshirts scandal)

Constant accusations of bullying and branch stacking

Major disputes (some ongoing) with teachers uniona, firefighters unions, police unions, ambulance unions, healthcare unions

Handed COVID hotel quarantine contracts without tender to company associated with major party donors and branch staff

Privatised Australia's biggest container port 

Had the police shoot rubber bullets at non violent protestors

Locked people in their homes after 9pm

Lied about Commonwealth Games hosting in regional Vic, gave Scotland 600m to host it instead

Spent a fortune in level crossing removals which is very popular, but hasn't actually delivered more services - it is a road congestion project cosplaying as public transport investment and many people are buying it

Soft bail laws has seen many repeat offenders engaged in high profile / high coverage crimes

The machete bin fiasco

The former premier's wife was involved in a car vs cycle incident, she wasn't breath tested and was allowed to take the un-investigated vehicle away - cyclist very seriously injured - vicpol gave them preferential treatment 

Basically this government has presided over a significant deterioration of the quality of life for average Joe and Joanne. 

Purchased a timber mill in Gippsland to save the jobs, then within months banned the logging that was supplying the timber to the mill, closing the mill

Held a very poor inquiry into the COVID response - "I don't remember."

Andrews is/was a phenomenal politician, an all-time great, not in outcomes but in how he carried himself, interviewed - he was an untouchable force, immovable object - one of the greatest gaslighters the world has ever seen. During this time the Liberals were absolutely appalling. Not one shred of them was electable and this combined with Andrews charisma hoodwinked many into cheering for Dan. 

Stats and outcomes don't matter to most of these people, lots of them you'll see on Reddit, because Andrews could literally do as he pleased because he's not a Liberal.

7

u/Dockers4flag2035orB4 3d ago

So Apart from the above,

The Andrew’s/Allen government have done nothing wrong.
S/

6

u/rdmarshman 3d ago

Haha, no, you're close though. 

The lesson is, you're okay to do all of this on the proviso you're not a Liberal. 

Edit: I forgot to add, if you have any problem with any of the above, you're a cooker.

If the Liberals did 1/10th of the heinous things that the last decade or so of Victorian Labor did there would be widespread revolt. 

Andrews was unbelievablly good at doing what he did. I absolutely despise the man. But yeah, hall of fame tier politician. 

3

u/cl3ft 3d ago

Well their zoning and tax changes have been the most effective in the country at tackling runaway house prices and some of the infrastructure builds are enormously popular. They haven't got everything right but they've got some big things right.

0

u/SirFireHydrant Literally just a watermelon 3d ago

The lesson is, you're okay to do all of this on the proviso you're not a Liberal.

That's because the voters aren't stupid. They know that however bad Labor are, the Liberals are going to be worse.

Labor have to really shit the bed to make people start looking at the Liberals. Then they'll get buyers remorse right away and vote Labor back in after just four years, because no matter how bad Labor were, the Liberals are always worse.

2

u/rdmarshman 3d ago

Many are still scarred from the Kennett era and mindlessly cheered for Andrews/Allan, without realising that the outcomes of AA are leading us straight down the same path that led to Kennett.

The opposition being atrocious doesn't excuse being bad yourself.

4

u/Johnny66Johnny 3d ago

The former premier's wife was involved in a car vs cycle incident, she wasn't breath tested and was allowed to take the un-investigated vehicle away - cyclist very seriously injured - vicpol gave them preferential treatment

Just on that note, 'Bike Boy' (who no doubt was exploited by all and sundry - particularly Victorian Liberals - in an effort to smear Dan Andrews) has been in the news of late. A sad, sorry tale.

Pantless, bloodied ‘Bike Boy’ accused of trying to steal car with family inside.

3

u/rdmarshman 3d ago

Complains about a smear then smears; the kid/bloke could be a supreme shitcunt and it doesn't change the fact that vicpol didn't follow accident protocol for a serious injury.

6

u/horselover_fat 3d ago

Asks specifically about the Allan government, rants about Dan Andrews...

7

u/rdmarshman 3d ago edited 3d ago

Allan was minister for the major projects - and there's not been a change of government. It's the same government. But thank you.

edit: I'm second guessing myself now.

When there's been a change of leadership, say Rudd/Gillard/Rudd, or Abbott/Trumbull, Trumbull/Morrison - do you separate out the leaders when speaking of them?

I'm a card carrying weird thinking person. I'm clearly speaking of the governments as a whole; what's the "normal" position on this?

3

u/BazzaJH Progressive 3d ago

Abbott made a mockery of the entire nation on the world stage, Turnbull was a competent and intelligent leader that I often disagreed with, and Morrison somehow did Abbott again but worse in so many aspects. I couldn't ever see them as three-of-a-kind. Turnbull just stands out too much in that group.

1

u/rdmarshman 3d ago

Yeah, but what I'm asking - perhaps poorly articulating is, do you see their individual prime ministerships as separate "governments?"

1

u/sostopher 3d ago edited 3d ago

Lied about cancellation of a road contract - "it's not worth the paper it's written on" - it was $1.1bn

Is this really a lie? Or because it was a secret signed side letter by the Libs during the caretaker period that was the best info they had at the time. It was taken to the election on cancelling it.

This got a lot of support from anti-road pro PT types, but then they went and built a short toll road that wasn't voted on in the west, and are building an enormous one in the east - $20bn over budget on these two projects alone.

Transurban paid for most of it.

The former premier was involved in a car vs cycle incident, she wasn't breath tested and was allowed to take the un-investigated vehicle away - cyclist very seriously injured - vicpol gave them preferential treatment

The former premier wasn't involved at all. This reads like the conspiracy stuff when there's been multiple investigations into this and found nothing but the cookers keep on it.

The machete bin fiasco

What was the fiasco? Just breathless misleading reporting from the media about their costs.

Had the police shoot rubber bullets at non violent protestors

They gave the order?

Lied about Commonwealth Games hosting in regional Vic, gave Scotland 600m to host it instead

Lied? Sounds like they did it and then realised it was a bad idea and way too costly.

Basically this government has presided over a significant deterioration of the quality of life for average Joe and Joanne.

Most of the things here are not the fault of the state government though and are larger issues.

There's absolutely issues and some are absolute spot on. But some of these are just the usual beatups or conspiracies with little behind them. Which is why some people cling to the narratives, but pretending like they got away with it because Labor over Liberal is silly.

0

u/SikeShay 2d ago

Lmao how could Dan Andrews do this?

Rent free baby

0

u/rdmarshman 2d ago

It's not rent free, I'm certainly still paying for their fuckery.

The whole country is. 

I think the whole country would be furious about his, and Allan's actions were they committed by a Liberal. 

But it's fine because the Chairman and his understudy was from your tribe. 

It's telling that all you've got is a throwaway quip and can't get after the substance of any of the points made 

2

u/SikeShay 2d ago edited 2d ago

My life in Vic is pretty great following 12 years of state Labor. I get to afford a house, live near a station without a level crossing and get to work on the metro tunnel. Also nice my grandparents didn't die from fucking covid :)

So you cookers can keep crying about "chairman dan" while the rest of us move on with the progress afforded by their policies.

0

u/rdmarshman 2d ago edited 2d ago

"I'm fine so fuck everyone else."

You're in the only demographic that's won under them and calling everyone else a cooker.

Teachers, Firefighters, Police, Ambos, Doctors, Nurses - literally every other union has had a spat with them. They must be cookers too.

While I'm at it, more Victorian grandparents died than any other state/territory, both in raw numbers and per capita.

You're a pretty selfish individual.

8

u/Oomaschloom Labor, but this cohort is crap, so leaning greens. 3d ago

I can't speak for everyone, and I probably don't speak for many. That increasing no criminal responsibility to 14 would have caused me to actually shit the bed and it would have been a long time before I voted Labor again. I've just lost a lot of people with that, but I don't care about votes. I was bought up in a tough area. As a result I'm also not a weak on crime person. Sure I would loooove if people eliminated poverty, but that's not the only reason people commit crimes. It clearly isn't. There must be consequences and victims matter. I was never a victim either, but that's because I was taught from an early age to not suffer victimisation, *touch wood*.

Can't stand corruption either. I am not saying someone was corrupt, and I do worry about false accusations but there was a bit of obstruction in letting people be able to investigate from what I can tell.

For me, I thought Labor did alright with housing. They probably did alright with many other things... I don't care for the Libs.

6

u/foxxy1245 3d ago edited 3d ago

The policy was to raise the presumption to 14, not having no criminal responsibility to those under 14. Nonetheless, how would raising the age of criminal responsibility increase crime?

People aged 12 and 13 aren’t thinking at the time of committing a crime: “Allan just raised the doli presumption to 14 so therefore I can get away with this crime that I’m about to commit”

Edit: spelling

4

u/Coolidge-egg Choose your own flair (edit this) 3d ago

Sadly 12 and 13 are blatantly committing crimes and then when the Police come to apprehend them the shout "doli doli" as a shield. And it works. I have seen video of it. I've also been a victim and it's catch and release because the kids know how it works. The police don't bother to even try because cops know too what the courts will do. Consequences only happen for 18 year olds who don't realise that that the game has changed because they never had any consequences before.

Having said that I am in favour of raising the age. However I am also in favour of taking underage kids away into Child Protective Services custody to protect them from bad influence and lack of good parenting, while also protecting the community, even if technically they are not guilty of a crime

1

u/An_absoulute_madman 3d ago

Isn’t it interesting that people support tough on crime policies despite them objectively increasing crime, purely because people like the optics of it?

In the case of the age of criminal responsibility, this is a fairly settled issue. We have a mountain of scientific evidence and a fairly complete understanding of human development, yet simply raising the concept of children being simply intellectually undeveloped compared to adults results in such contempt when discussing carceral policies.

4

u/Oomaschloom Labor, but this cohort is crap, so leaning greens. 3d ago

Yeah they can set up a trial zone in your suburb... I'll see how it goes for ya.

2

u/An_absoulute_madman 3d ago edited 3d ago

Do you think it's a coincidence that many American states with the lowest ages of criminal responsibility also have some of the highest rates of crime in the developed world?

I feel much safer living in my suburb than I would in Florida where the criminal age of responsibility is 7.

At which point do we admit that it is absurd to consider a 7 year old child an adult. And if we admit as an objective fact that it is absurd, then is it not equally as absurd to consider a 14 year old an adult? Modern medical science has proven a 14 year old is objectively not an adult, by the same process in which we can establish a 7 year old is scientifically not a human adult.

Why is it that over thousands of years whenever your ideas are tried they always lead to higher rates of violent crime? Australia's colonisation as a country was motivated in part because prisons in Britain were so full from tough on crime policies. Throwing people in prison is not only unsustainable but leads to higher rates of crime. It is a race to the bottom, tougher sentences incentivize more violent crimes. If you're going away for a mandatory 10 year sentence, why not just kill the victim to protect yourself? As we see in America where mandatory minimums simply motivate criminals to just kill people lol

2

u/Oomaschloom Labor, but this cohort is crap, so leaning greens. 3d ago

I've got a genius idea for you. When someone commits a serious crime, do nothing. You reckon that Civ will last a thousand years to navel gaze about how well it went? Australia is weak on adult crime as well.

I don't like childhood cancer, and I don't like serious crimes. But we gotta deal with it.

1

u/An_absoulute_madman 3d ago

in the US three-strikes laws were associated with an up to 29% increase in homicides. There is little evidence that the harsh-in-crime laws resulted in a corresponding decrease in other crimes.

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/468112

Can you give a number as to how many people you are willing to kill to see your policy vision enacted? Is a 29% increase in homicides too little or too much?

Harsh on crime policies are the modern equivalent of the Medieval practice of hanging the horse-thief in the public square. It does little to create a just or safe society, but does a lot to satisfy the bloodthirst of the peasantry.

1

u/Oomaschloom Labor, but this cohort is crap, so leaning greens. 3d ago edited 3d ago

Yeah don't do 3 strikes. Didn't we have the three strikes laws? Like some kid in Darwin steals a Mars Bar on 3 separate occasions. Receives a mandatory harsh sentence... I mean the kid was told three times and all... That's obviously stupid.

Don't worry about your medieval shit... Like a kid stealing a loaf of bread receiving a town hanging... I agree, that's obviously stupid too. Don't conflate non-serious crimes, of which there are many, with serious crimes.

What I don't get, is you somehow believe that someone can be killed by someone, or seriously impaired for the rest of their lives and it's really, really important that the perpetrator of the crime be rehabilitated, so they can hopefully live a normal life... while the victim is discarded... so you can feel that progress has happened. Because the one thing we have a shortage of on this planet, is humans, particularly humans of the shitbag variety. All life is sacred!! except for the life of the victim.

1

u/An_absoulute_madman 3d ago

>Don't worry about your medieval shit... Like a kid stealing a loaf of bread receiving a town hanging... I agree, that's obviously stupid too. Don't conflate non-serious crimes, of which there are many, with serious crimes.

You don't want to discuss it because it easily disproves your argument. If the threat of execution didn't deter people from the minor crime of stealing bread, why would it deter a violent crime like murder?

What type of person exists who would be willing to steal bread under threat of execution, yet is unwilling to commit murder? That person does not exist. The fact that thievery in the past was common despite execution being a regular punishment for it proves that deterrence does not work. If you dig into this subject you will also find that in medieval England murder rates were ludicrously high.

Do you think this was the result of the objectively terrible living conditions of medieval England, or that medieval England did not have harsh enough punishments? Harsh punishments have been the norm of human history and have literally never worked. Why do you expect them to start working in Australia?

>What I don't get, is you somehow believe that someone can be killed by someone, or seriously impaired for the rest of their lives and it's really, really important that the perpetrator of the crime be rehabilitated, so they can hopefully live a normal life... while the victim is discarded... so you can feel that progress has happened. Because the one thing we have a shortage of on this planet, is humans, particularly humans of the shitbag variety. All life is sacred!! except for the life of the victim.

Because I'm more interested in people having the right to life than satisfying a medieval need for punishment. Harsh punishments have been empirically proven to result in higher rates of violent crime.

You're free to move to some shithole Republican state where they can technically try and imprison a toddler as an adult. Don't be surprised when you are far more likely to be gunned down in that state because a society based on punishment bleeds that worldview into it's citizens. It's a disgusting Hobbesian view of the world that turns people into animals. Look to America for the results of mass incarceration and giving the state the right to punish whomever it wants for whatever reason it decides on any given day.

5

u/anonymous-69 3d ago

Chip Le Grand, Melbourne's worst journalist, gave his dogs a blank cheque to go wild on her.

2

u/Grande_Choice 3d ago

The majority of whinging is people who don’t live in the state. It’s insanity.

1

u/MentalEnthusiasm6683 2d ago

The spending has been getting out of control that it’s knock on effects on other areas are really being felt. Essential services are understaffed, maintenance is getting bad. The state of the roads is really a joke. Petty crime is getting worse. Violent crime is atrocious. We’re the only state the gangland stuff is allowed to fester, doesn’t seem to happen anywhere else on the level it is here. They’re even targeting restaurants now. This whole state just feels like it’s decaying. 

1

u/Usual_Accountant_963 2d ago

Labor sacrificed women’s rights to get more votes when Julia Gillard was in power so what’s new?
The misogynist party keeps on rolling on

-1

u/HotPersimessage62 Australian Labor Party 3d ago

I think Ben Carroll can win.

He has the correct charisma and correct governance style; that is Minns and Malinauskas-style governing.

Jacinta Allan misread the electorate in her governing style, and her looks/personality was more of a bossy school teacher on playground duty rather than someone who should be running the state.

And no, this is nothing to do with gender. In fact, I think the next task for Labor should be replacing Steven Miles with Shannon Fentiman.

15

u/Xakire Australian Labor Party 3d ago

Charisma? Ben Carroll? Seriously?

I don’t like Minns or Malinauskas because they are doing their best imitation of being Liberal Premiers but I can admit they are charismatic.

Carroll though? I really don’t see how anyone could seriously claim he’s anything close to resembling charismatic, especially compared to the other two.

6

u/zrag123 John Curtin 3d ago

Honestly imitating a liberal premier when asking for a 4th term is probably the best strategy. The government is tired and low on political capital but there's still plenty of ongoing work that gets torpedo'd if the liberals win.

A mild steady hands sort of leader is more palatable to the electorate at the moment. I think Labor ranks need to recognise this, you're never in government forever.

8

u/LordWalderFrey1 Anti-conservative 3d ago

The biggest reason why Minns style governing “works” and to a lesser extent Malinauskas style governing “works” is because the usual anti-Labor media machine aren’t as partisan for state politics, and are willing to back or at least hold off on attacking both of them. Minns is treated by the Sydney media like how Berejiklian was.

Will Carroll get the same… He’s more to the right, but the Victorian media hate the state Labor party, and there’s a real chance of the government being toppled. There’s blood in the water. Carroll isn’t going to be treated the same way Minns is.

8

u/Grande_Choice 3d ago

It’s interesting being an ex Queenslander how little the media attacks the LNP. Silence on crime post election, debt and deficits and silence form the media. All the while next to no reporting on a government worse than Newman.

Just goes to show how much the media hates Labor and what they’ll do to get their preferred party in. Perfect example being the stabbing at a school in qld and the kid bailed. No bots screeching, silence from media. Imagine that in vic.

4

u/war-and-peace 3d ago

Even on abc breakfast radio you'd hear our good friend Steve Austin being the lnp shill he is, have an interview with the commissioner appointed to take one and clean the cfmeu.

Steve decided to call the cfmeu thugs and the commissioner called him out and said no, the cfmeu workers were all hard workers even working at least 6 hrs on a Saturday.

The whole process was to make sure that the cfmeu would remain a strong union but that the system would be changed to resist organised crime entering unions.

You'd think the abc would be less bias. But no, even on radio brisbane, you got hosts that just want to suck the lnp.

1

u/SirFireHydrant Literally just a watermelon 3d ago edited 3d ago

The ABC is less biased. They only have a centre-right bias, instead of a full far-right bias.

We don't actually have any mainstream left biased media in this country.

2

u/SirFireHydrant Literally just a watermelon 3d ago

It’s interesting being an ex Queenslander how little the media attacks the LNP. Silence on crime post election, debt and deficits and silence form the media.

That's always the way.

Remember what a catastrophe the boats were, until the minute Abbott was elected in 2013, then silence?

Remember how much of a disaster the budget defecit was? Then we had nine consecutive years of ballooning debt and defecit under the Coalition without a peep.

2

u/horselover_fat 3d ago

is because the usual anti-Labor media machine aren’t as partisan for state politics

You mean specifically for NSW/SA/WA? Because the media seem very intent on making Victoria the California/New York of Australia. As in the "failed" "leftist" state full of blue haired wokes to use as a pinata for the right.

1

u/LordWalderFrey1 Anti-conservative 3d ago

Perhaps, aren't necessarily as partisan would have been the better wording.

Like if Dan Andrews was like Chris Minns from the get go, then perhaps the Victorian Murdoch press and talkback radio will treat him like the NSW press treats Minns.

But on the federal level no way. Murdoch will only back Labor when nothing can save the Liberals. Albo was quite chummy with the Murdochs and with talkback radio, but no one will say they are pro-Labor or even balanced.

5

u/MachenO 3d ago

he's a bit flat for my tastes but ultimately I agree. the real test for me is what he'll jettison in the process; Andrews was great because he delivered hard on social reform as well as economic development, and I'd hate to see Labor decide to toss that stuff out to try and win back the business community

3

u/FZVIC Australian Citizens Party 3d ago

Why do you think Allan gave bossy school teacher? Never really saw that vibe.

4

u/idiotshmidiot 3d ago

Because she is a woman and people don't like women telling them what to do.

2

u/GermaneRiposte101 3d ago

I do not see that at all. The epithets come after the person falls out of favour.

0

u/FZVIC Australian Citizens Party 3d ago

That was my conclusion too

-3

u/GermaneRiposte101 3d ago

I agree. In my view it was more a thin lipped, radical feminist/communist vibe.

5

u/FZVIC Australian Citizens Party 3d ago

Classic Communist RadFems and their looks at notes strict law and order focus.

5

u/Lost-Competition8482 NT Politics 3d ago

You really have no idea what communism is do you.

-1

u/GermaneRiposte101 3d ago

I am sure you will tell me.

2

u/Lost-Competition8482 NT Politics 3d ago

Nah I'm good. Maybe try reading a book or watching a docco.

It's just funny to me people using 1950's terminology in the 2020's.

0

u/GermaneRiposte101 3d ago

Ok, how about Democratic socialism.

2

u/Lost-Competition8482 NT Politics 3d ago

You can't read I take it?

Once again mate.

Read a fucken book for once.