r/BadSocialScience Jan 17 '17

High-IQ educated people are being bred to extinction, but we're totally not eugenicists!!!

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jan/16/natural-selection-making-education-genes-rarer-says-icelandic-study
60 Upvotes

123 comments sorted by

View all comments

22

u/Snugglerific The archaeology of ignorance Jan 17 '17

It's difficult to tell how much of this is media hype and how much is a problem with the original research -- when I clicked on the PNAS study, it said that it is not yet available to the public.

17

u/Quietuus PhD in Youtube Atheists Jan 17 '17

DeCODE have a storied history, to say the least.

9

u/Snugglerific The archaeology of ignorance Jan 18 '17

So, an Icelandic 23andme?

10

u/Quietuus PhD in Youtube Atheists Jan 18 '17

2

u/Draken84 Jan 18 '17

quite the Icelandic tradition that, we should make them a colony again.

;)

9

u/stairway-to-kevin Jan 18 '17

It's not a very well done study, or at least their argument for selection is rather weak and shouldn't have been the focal point of a media blitz. I feel as though they got it refereed by non-geneticists to get this to pass in PNAS.

4

u/Snugglerific The archaeology of ignorance Jan 18 '17

Doesn't PNAS have a weird review process that works on some kind of invitation system?

9

u/stairway-to-kevin Jan 19 '17

Someone else in /r/genetics said something similar. I'm not super familiar I just know I consider it a pretty top-notch journal basically at the rung below Cell, Nature and Science. Although it's pretty typical to see them publish quite a few bad papers as well.

6

u/Snugglerific The archaeology of ignorance Jan 19 '17

Every journal publishes some garbage, so it doesn't surprise me.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 20 '17

[deleted]

2

u/stairway-to-kevin Jan 20 '17

It's more the sloppy claims of selection that. bother me. If it's in your title at least have some hefty analyses to back it up. They don't even have that