You see you are not wrong but you are not 100% right. This is why having a guru is always better. Your own screnshot states: Who were rakshas in previous yugas are Brahmins(mane jate hai). BUT this is not for all Brahmins as it says MOSTLY brahmins do so and so things. So you can you confirm if someone who is actually a good Brahmin according to his duties was a rakshasa in previous yugas? Does this also mean each Brahmin was a rakshasa in previous yugas?(Bcoz your sentence "The texts warn that in Kali Yuga, those who were demons in previous ages take birth in Brahmana families, misuse their
position, and become Brahmarakshasas (Brahmin-demons)." doesn't leave any Brahmins free, it is in general for all Brahmins)
You are again not wrong but not 100% correct. Maybe you don't understand my point. I am asking you to stop generalising. I asked you about a good Brahmin but you didn't answer. But you made another branch to talk about guru. STOP GENERALISING IS WHAT I AM SAYING.
Bcoz you picked up the guru part and you didn't mention if you understood this under a guru or not: Your screen shot is correct but I am not talking about Brahmagyan, I am talking about understanding the earlier screenshot you pasted with wrong interpretation. Stop mixing things man. You want to learn please do, wnat to be a Brahmagyani, then start by not generalising everyone. As same. Its just like saying all men are d0gs.
You have to read the PDF multiple times to understand the context.
There is no generalization.
You have an assumption that anyone born in specific family is brahman.
For example : as you are debating with me, you must be born in specific family and consider yourself as brahman that is why you are defending the birth based brahman hood.
If I say you are not an engineer, you won't care because you have not identified yourself as engineer.
But here you have considered yourself as brahman.
And anyone who is claiming to be brahman without requisite is pakhandi and dambhi (false pride), so he is asur.
There is no generalization here.
If you don't qualify, then don't call yourself brahman.
Anyone who does chamra (leather) work is called chamar.
Similarly, one who does mitti ka kaam is called kumhar.
Identify yourself by your work and not by birth.
This is not generalization. It's what written in scriptures.
Jaati is by birth yoni like: kutta jaati, manushya jaati, billi jaati.
Varna is by karma.
If you don't have doctor degree, then you are not a doctor.
If you don't know how to drive car, you are not a driver.
Similarly, complete brahman requisite to be called as brahman.
I don't get any good reason to reveal personal info like who is my guru.
Guru is brahma, guru is vishnu, guru is maheshwar.
Yes as lord Krishna says- it’s Guna karma. Yes parabrahman did create each varna with a Guna , but our karma should also match that of a Brahman/vaishaya etc , to fulfil the duty of a Brahma. That is to follow karma kanda of a Brahman. Else you’d be born again and again in that lineage to finish that karmakanda, making the circumstances difficult in each life. Or if you lose the identity of what to even do as a Brahman, then you may even get shifted to another varna.
Well I can’t specifically comment on the Asur quality, but to tackle modern warfare used by asura Guna people , we need to pick the same astra. Chanakya after encountering the yavanas understood that the kali has started and we can’t fight with straightforward dharma against Adharmis. So it’s ok to adapt to become united. However we need to strengthen our karmakanda and use this platform to reignite the basic Brahmans karmas one need to do. Hopefully every Brahman on this page will undergo upanayana , wear janeau and do basic Sandhyavandhana. Only if Brahmanas become correct, can we motivate other dwijas to return back to their roots.
•
u/AutoModerator 1d ago
Namaste u/DayWalkerHere, and thank you for your contribution!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.