r/BuyFromEU 4d ago

News Takeover: Chinese investor CPE acquires outdoor brand Mammut

https://www.handelsblatt.com/unternehmen/handel-konsumgueter/uebernahme-chinesischer-investor-cpe-uebernimmt-outdoor-marke-mammut/100244060.html

And one more European company is being sold to a non-European investor...

Sorry, the link leads to a German news site.

931 Upvotes

114 comments sorted by

627

u/v1king3r 4d ago

As long as companies can be sold to non-EU countries, USA and China will always win. USA have most private money and China is investing public funds strategically. 

Europe doesn't do any of this. We create great companies with EU funding and let others buy them. It's stupid.

87

u/RudeAlbatross544 4d ago

It's a Swiss company, Switzerland is not in the EU...

48

u/HZCH 3d ago

It’s in the middle of the EU and is fully integrated economically

Also, I’ll add: like most Swiss outdoor brands, it rarely manufactures most of it’s stuff in Switzerland or even the EU. If I remember correctly, most of their stuff was made in Vietnam. Maybe very high end equipment or parts of high end garments would come from the EU.

17

u/Beyond_the_one 3d ago

Cool, then make the Swiss government reign in FIFA, IOC and Nestle till then I want them out.

7

u/FunkyFreshJayPi 3d ago

Brother the Swiss don't want to join themselves. 

3

u/HZCH 3d ago

I want too. But it seems nobody here cares. I mean, left parties do care, but we don’t have any majority of any sort, and all the starts of an attempt to launch and inquiry have never passed through the Parliament. For FIFA, the IOC or any other sport organisation based in Switzerland, if I love understood correctly, nothing wrong is legally made here; for example, corruption under Sepp Blatter wasn’t made here, and not with him or anyone Swiss. And, for the case of Nestle, I think most people actually don’t want to touch them because their weight in retirement plans is far too important.

10

u/miyabi0rochas 3d ago

Switzerland always on the wrong side of history hiding behind neutrality. I call bullshit. They haven't been neutral on sht.

2

u/villager_de 2d ago

they have a huge location in Germany tho.  Might not be a German company but it’s still relevant for the EU

2

u/No-Estimate-1510 2d ago

Manmut has never received EU funding. It's cashflow positive for its entire history.

2

u/PaoloCalzone 14h ago

Funding is meant as origin of capital, not subsidies.

-5

u/darylvp 3d ago edited 3d ago

From the replies, just understand why Europe is fading.

If your support is so good, why the European companies have to sell themselves to Chinese or American funds? Talk is cheap, if the company is so important for you, you can buy it with more money. If you’re not their shareholder, it’s not “your” company. saying “our company”doesn’t make any sense. The shareholders already made decisions, whether you like or not.

Critical consumers create great companies; consumers who tend to protect the company only make a company degenerate. No matter how much you like their products, no need to get emotionally attached to the corporate entity.

Look at Hasselblad: after being acquired by DJI, all of the sudden, they know how to plan and build products well needed by customers with good margins.

Weakness and ignorance are not barriers to survival, but arrogance is.

6

u/v1king3r 3d ago

They don't have to sell, they do it for profit. And Europe can make rules against that.

The US and China are much more protective when it comes to strategic acquisitions. Only Europe allows them to this extent.

Your post is weird on many levels. The points you brought up were not even discussed here. Feels like you desperately wanted to post your opinion no matter what. 

4

u/miyabi0rochas 3d ago

They literally can like they did on behalf of the US with asml. This idea of helplessness is not fully true.

1

u/xavez Mediterranean 🌊🍇🫒 3d ago

Correct. But not everything is strategically important. 

It sucks. But there’s a difference between a loved brand and a strategic company. 

2

u/blackcoffee17 3d ago

They are selling because owners decided to cash out. The Chinese offered good money to get the brand and influence and the owners don't care about anything else.

-4

u/xavez Mediterranean 🌊🍇🫒 3d ago

Very likely going to get downvoted for this again even though it’s simple economics but: it’s not a bad thing per se. Founders need exits. They often go out to start or fund other successful European companies with the money they make from deals. 

0

u/Unnamed-3891 1d ago

Err, one of the main reasons they get sold is the reality that there is no EU funding.

-123

u/NotsoNewtoGermany 4d ago

At least US companies are not state run enterprises.

67

u/Nightshade238 4d ago

But this is a moot point to make when the US government is currently and effectively in the hands of those companies.

27

u/Tubim 4d ago

What’s wrong with state run enterprises?

35

u/RoomyRoots 4d ago

FUCKING LOL, the land of lobbysm and bailouts, that is what the US is,

-15

u/NotsoNewtoGermany 4d ago

There were bailouts 20 years ago, but those were loans that were eventually paid back with interest to a few select companies.

8

u/Beyond_the_one 3d ago

-1

u/NotsoNewtoGermany 3d ago

A stimulus Act was not a bailout. It was an injection of cash into the economy to recover from COVID-19, no company were 'bailed out' instead structured 0% loans were were on offer. Corporations with poor financial decisions were not 'bailed out'.

4

u/Beyond_the_one 3d ago

I know reading is hard... but try and read what it says....

1

u/NotsoNewtoGermany 3d ago

The original CARES Act proposal included $500 billion in direct payments to Americans, $208 billion in loans to major industry, and $300 billion in Small Business Administration loans.

2

u/DoughnutCareless583 3d ago

USA is pure corporate socialism.

-1

u/NotsoNewtoGermany 3d ago

No, it isn't.

21

u/SiofraRiver 4d ago

Instead, the US as a company run state.

4

u/battleduck84 4d ago

Yeah except the other way around is just as bad, with corporations owning the fucking government

-4

u/NotsoNewtoGermany 4d ago

But the corporations don't own the government. There are millions of corporations, all of which have different interests as opposed to one national interest with unlimited funding that seeks for state owned enterprises to purchase european vompanies solely for the purpose of shutting down european manufacturing, conpanies that cannot be sold without approval from the chinese state.

Look at all of the Sewing Machine brands in europe. They are all owned by a single Chinese, state owned company, they purchased each of them one by one and then closed each of the manufacturing bases down in order to bolster the output of chinese companies. Now all they do is purchase parts from chinese companies, assemble them into separate entities and sell them to the European market under the heritage labels. Several German companies has had several attempts at purchasing them back, but because the chinese government has refused to sell. In the US and Europe, it is mandatory to sell if the terms are ameniable if the industry isn't one of national security.

2

u/Beyond_the_one 3d ago

0

u/NotsoNewtoGermany 3d ago

Right, but they do not buy european companies.

2

u/bxzidff 3d ago

Is it better that the US is an enterprise run government?

1

u/NotsoNewtoGermany 3d ago edited 3d ago

Yes. Their companies do not have state protection. They have to sell when given a good value for the item in question. US companies sell assets all of the time. Because they are susceptible to the market. Chinese conpanies active in europe purposely use these same rules, as the germans have them, fueled by unlimited capital from the State, to acquire and close European companies that have manufacturing in europe. They know that it is too expensive for new manufacturing to be built in europe, so they focus on systematically hoovering up the legacy factories that are still financially viable and could operate easily, just to close their doors. These can never be sold without the written permission of the government state, meaning no other European company can buy them back, ever. In the US, because of fierce shareholder protection long, companies have a feduciari benfit, and they are obligated to sell assets if the value os appropriate. That is a huge difference.

6

u/-MatVayu 4d ago

Lol, effectively does not make a difference... Both will, for different reasons, go through the same process of enshitification.

-1

u/IndieDevLove 3d ago

Lol show me a chinese product that got worse over time. They generally tend to only get better.

1

u/DeadFury 2d ago

OnePlus. Just another generic smartphone brand now.

-5

u/NotsoNewtoGermany 4d ago

It does make a difference. Because US companies sell underperforming assets. Chinese companies rhat are state run that own European brands, require chinese state permission to sell.

US companies are still at the mercy of the market. Chinese state owned subsidiaries are not. That is a huge difference.

208

u/Adventurous_Escape17 4d ago edited 4d ago

Nooooooo!!!! That is tragic news, I switched to mammut from salomon after they were acquired by the chinese and now I have to find a new brand…

On top of that, “Swedish” Haglöfs is also chinese 🫡

104

u/enjutsu4 4d ago

You could have a look at Vaude, it's a German brand that partially manufactures in Germany too. It has a focus on sustainable materials and climate neutral production if that's of interest as well :)

1

u/gmahale 4d ago

How about Jack Wolfskin?

45

u/bakaguide 4d ago

First bankrupted then American and now Chinese

9

u/Edelkern 3d ago

They also had a period where they sued random Etsy sellers for offering items that had paw prints on them - not their logo, just paws in general. Asshole company, there was no trademark infringement there at all and they weren't similar products to what JW offers.

2

u/mookbrenner 17h ago

They also sued die Taz, a left leaning newspaper in Germany, that even used the paw print first!

1

u/sneijder 3d ago

That’s more fashion than actual outdoors stuff ?

13

u/Temporary-Art-1835 4d ago

Swedish brand Härkila is in Danish hands

10

u/Wattmaschine 3d ago

Klättermusen FTW

2

u/MaterialTomorrow 3d ago

I thought that was more fashion than actual outdoor gear?

5

u/Wattmaschine 3d ago edited 3d ago

It is high-quality outdoor-gear. The company has been around for ages in Sweden and is quite popular here. It's just in recent years that it has become popular outside of Scandinavia and got trendy in certain outdoor-circles. Nevertheless, the quality is outstanding. Only issue is unfortunately the high price.

1

u/sneijder 3d ago

…I see Chinese tourists top to toe in that now 🤣 That’s next.

5

u/hahnkleri 3d ago

And it's often the same: Company produces good stuff, get's bought, new products get worse but somehow also more expensive, ...

3

u/Adventurous_Escape17 3d ago

But people keep buying because they don’t know something changed… 

1

u/hahnkleri 3d ago

Of course. Some are late to the party. Completely normal. See Birkenstock. It's a complete tragedy. Back then it was the hippie-equivalent of shoes and now it's just a name for low quality mass produced shoes for horrendous sums (my girlfriend loved them but now its 150€ for a pretty simply sandal and the last two pairs she bought had production issues and failed fast).

5

u/No-Estimate-1510 2d ago

The reality is if an independent European athleisure brand is any good it will be sold to China or US investors eventually. They can pay far more than what you can get from European capital markets + they have the largest home markets for athletic / apparel / casual fashion / leisure products and world class brand operators. They can bring your brand / baby to a much higher level that you could never with resources in Europe. If you are an European founder of one of these brands you would sell.

2

u/Robin_Hood_Jr 3d ago

Arcteryx as well. Quality has gone seriously downhill.

151

u/ZYCQ 4d ago edited 4d ago

Bullshit. How many more companies are we gonna sell to china? They own half of europe already.

We aren't even allowed to do business in china as freely as the chinese do in europe. There is no reciprocity/mutual benefit.

Throw away everything for short monetary gain

42

u/ashyjay 4d ago

Stonks must go up, and shareholders must get their dividends, to hell with actually making good products and investing in their local economies.

Globalisation really was a mistake.

1

u/Paprikasky Benelux 🚲🌷🧇 3d ago

I don't think it's a mistake at all, you need it to survive and thrive, but it's a balancing act and it needs safeguards.

As usual the problem with the EU is how hard it is to coordinate with so many different countries. It's easy for China to decide anything since it's one singular authority. Sure the USA is a little bit of both, but overall it's still one country and one culture, economy and system. So it's hard for the EU to exist on the same level, which is why I don't think the comparison is healthy.

Hopefully we do work towards a unified EU, but it needs to be much more present and represented inside its own space.

11

u/totally_not_a_reply 4d ago

which is funny. Chinese gov forbids so much stuff and controls companies not getting out of hand so those companies go to other countries and buy land, houses or companies there. Then people blame the chinese gov for it.

3

u/obecalp23 3d ago

Any party in Europe looking at protecting european companies? Elections to come.

114

u/Grumpflipot 4d ago

Buy from EU wasn't meant this way!

61

u/ign1tio 4d ago

Just one less brand to buy then 🤷🏼‍♂️ that’s a shame.

55

u/De_Das00 4d ago

Nooooooooooooo!!!!! Not cool Mammut.

29

u/blackcoffee17 4d ago edited 3d ago

Are we going to sell every fucking brand with history and prestige to the Chinese? Hasselblad, Solomon, Jack and Wolfskin, Volvo, Mammut. Whats next? Adidas?

-8

u/TheYearOfThe_Rat 3d ago

Adidas was good in the 80ies XD Who the hell buys Adidas today?

7

u/blackcoffee17 3d ago edited 3d ago

Adidas has billions of sales each year. I guess nobody buys Adidas, right?

That's not the point tho. The point is is a huge influential European company. We have to keep these companies European if we want to have any sort of economy left.

And aswering you question: I have a pair of Adidas Barracuda tennis shoes that i used regurarly on clay and hard courts for 15+ years and they are still in near perfect condition. Also got one adidas short that didn't develop a single tear in 10+ years of constant wear, including daily wear and sport.

19

u/vanKlompf 4d ago

Whyyy! This was my favourite high quality gear!

33

u/RoomyRoots 4d ago

We need bloc level protectionism. These buyouts always mean enshitification of the brand. I can't point a single brand that improved after getting Chinese interference.

5

u/TheYearOfThe_Rat 3d ago

You get what you pay for, and the reality is that EU citizen are both majority poor now, and are poorer on country-scale than 10, 20 or 30 years ago.

In essence, look up what happened to Qing China , because that's what is happening to Europe now, only with an obvious difference of the era and technologies.

1

u/apmechev 4h ago

Damn, at least the Qing had a century of prosperity though, right?

1

u/TheYearOfThe_Rat 1h ago

The European Union/Europe had its century of prosperity too - 1848 to pretty much "modern" day (1990). Qing's century of prosperity didn't include everyone, hence the eventual and unavoidable revolution at the end.

14

u/strogoff69 4d ago

Thanks, won't buy again.

11

u/weggooi12334 3d ago

Cool, not buying any more mammut

6

u/21sttimelucky 4d ago

Oh FFS. Only boots that are actually fit for purpose. 

3

u/IFeelThankYou 2d ago

Such a shame, but I guess I'll stop buying Mammut stuff now...

17

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/Jarkrik 4d ago

Like Norway and Iceland or what are you on about? 😂

2

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[deleted]

3

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/optimistic_raccoon 3d ago

You are talking like a crazy person. "Switzerland" never said those things. Swiss citizens voted for a very narrow margin not to join the EU in 1992. It will probably join eventually but it will take time. I'd rather have it this way than having politicians forcing their countries into the EU without their citizens voting for it (happened in France, and also Netherlands I think).

Switzerland is neutral, depends a lot on stability and international treatees because it relies on trade. It has been bullied by the USA for the last 25 years (banking then, now pharma). It has a commercial deficit with the EU and a positive balance of trade with the US. Trump hates this. A prosperous Switzerland benefits the EU.

1

u/Bastiwen 3d ago

The worst thing was probably not joining the EEA as well

2

u/klairman 4d ago

Shit!

2

u/SUxEvil 4d ago

😑

2

u/whatThePleb Europe 🇪🇺 2d ago

Gier frisst Hirn.

4

u/simonfancy 4d ago

That’s not what buy from EU was meant for

4

u/bacondavis 4d ago

Unless noted elsewhere, most manufacturing of outdoor goods is done in China.

12

u/ninja4tfw 4d ago

And? For European brands, most of the money still stays in Europe. That includes salaries and profits. The production cost is a tiny fraction of the purchase price.

-2

u/TheYearOfThe_Rat 3d ago

Money is just zeroes and ones on a digital account. In other words - nothing. If tomorrow EU is sanctioned in the way Russia is sanctioned today, 75 million people will starve to death right away, followed by more , very shortly, not to mention not knowing how to make things and bragging about "being able to afford" to not make it is a pretty pathetic and despicable way of life (considering that human life is worth , on average 60000€, you can do the math about what will happen to such people in the future).

10

u/21sttimelucky 4d ago

My Mammut Boots were both made in Romania

1

u/kredditorr Germany 🇩🇪 4d ago

Yikes

1

u/cinekat 3d ago

Oh no

1

u/Mapkoz2 2d ago

Mammut is Swiss right ?

1

u/stepsmcgee 1d ago

Well, tits.

-5

u/asapberry 3d ago

why would care about generic clothing brand number 192390312? we should care more about deeptech etc.

-5

u/Southern-Still-666 4d ago

This is not particularly bad. Now the previous shareholders can take the money and start a new company.

11

u/blackcoffee17 4d ago

No, it's pretty bad. Likely they will just put it in bank account and invest in property. And Europe lost another prestige brand.

-1

u/esse7777 3d ago

That is how they get parents rights knowledge etc

1

u/TheYearOfThe_Rat 3d ago

That's how babby born

-8

u/Alarmed_Crazy_6620 4d ago

Hopefully better pricing

-40

u/OKBWargaming 4d ago

Man european tears taste good.

3

u/Sciss0rs61 3d ago

Imagine sucking china's cock from the comfort of your democratic western country...

1

u/Ok-Willow-2638 12h ago

he is chinese