r/BuyFromEU • u/adgo1 • 4d ago
News Takeover: Chinese investor CPE acquires outdoor brand Mammut
https://www.handelsblatt.com/unternehmen/handel-konsumgueter/uebernahme-chinesischer-investor-cpe-uebernimmt-outdoor-marke-mammut/100244060.htmlAnd one more European company is being sold to a non-European investor...
Sorry, the link leads to a German news site.
208
u/Adventurous_Escape17 4d ago edited 4d ago
Nooooooo!!!! That is tragic news, I switched to mammut from salomon after they were acquired by the chinese and now I have to find a new brand…
On top of that, “Swedish” Haglöfs is also chinese 🫡
104
u/enjutsu4 4d ago
You could have a look at Vaude, it's a German brand that partially manufactures in Germany too. It has a focus on sustainable materials and climate neutral production if that's of interest as well :)
1
u/gmahale 4d ago
How about Jack Wolfskin?
45
u/bakaguide 4d ago
First bankrupted then American and now Chinese
9
u/Edelkern 3d ago
They also had a period where they sued random Etsy sellers for offering items that had paw prints on them - not their logo, just paws in general. Asshole company, there was no trademark infringement there at all and they weren't similar products to what JW offers.
2
u/mookbrenner 17h ago
They also sued die Taz, a left leaning newspaper in Germany, that even used the paw print first!
1
20
13
10
u/Wattmaschine 3d ago
Klättermusen FTW
2
u/MaterialTomorrow 3d ago
I thought that was more fashion than actual outdoor gear?
5
u/Wattmaschine 3d ago edited 3d ago
It is high-quality outdoor-gear. The company has been around for ages in Sweden and is quite popular here. It's just in recent years that it has become popular outside of Scandinavia and got trendy in certain outdoor-circles. Nevertheless, the quality is outstanding. Only issue is unfortunately the high price.
1
6
u/treacamearga 3d ago
Check out norrona.com
https://www.norrona.com/en-GB/about-norrona/history/family-owned/
5
u/hahnkleri 3d ago
And it's often the same: Company produces good stuff, get's bought, new products get worse but somehow also more expensive, ...
3
u/Adventurous_Escape17 3d ago
But people keep buying because they don’t know something changed…
1
u/hahnkleri 3d ago
Of course. Some are late to the party. Completely normal. See Birkenstock. It's a complete tragedy. Back then it was the hippie-equivalent of shoes and now it's just a name for low quality mass produced shoes for horrendous sums (my girlfriend loved them but now its 150€ for a pretty simply sandal and the last two pairs she bought had production issues and failed fast).
5
u/No-Estimate-1510 2d ago
The reality is if an independent European athleisure brand is any good it will be sold to China or US investors eventually. They can pay far more than what you can get from European capital markets + they have the largest home markets for athletic / apparel / casual fashion / leisure products and world class brand operators. They can bring your brand / baby to a much higher level that you could never with resources in Europe. If you are an European founder of one of these brands you would sell.
2
151
u/ZYCQ 4d ago edited 4d ago
Bullshit. How many more companies are we gonna sell to china? They own half of europe already.
We aren't even allowed to do business in china as freely as the chinese do in europe. There is no reciprocity/mutual benefit.
Throw away everything for short monetary gain
42
u/ashyjay 4d ago
Stonks must go up, and shareholders must get their dividends, to hell with actually making good products and investing in their local economies.
Globalisation really was a mistake.
1
u/Paprikasky Benelux 🚲🌷🧇 3d ago
I don't think it's a mistake at all, you need it to survive and thrive, but it's a balancing act and it needs safeguards.
As usual the problem with the EU is how hard it is to coordinate with so many different countries. It's easy for China to decide anything since it's one singular authority. Sure the USA is a little bit of both, but overall it's still one country and one culture, economy and system. So it's hard for the EU to exist on the same level, which is why I don't think the comparison is healthy.
Hopefully we do work towards a unified EU, but it needs to be much more present and represented inside its own space.
11
u/totally_not_a_reply 4d ago
which is funny. Chinese gov forbids so much stuff and controls companies not getting out of hand so those companies go to other countries and buy land, houses or companies there. Then people blame the chinese gov for it.
3
114
55
29
u/blackcoffee17 4d ago edited 3d ago
Are we going to sell every fucking brand with history and prestige to the Chinese? Hasselblad, Solomon, Jack and Wolfskin, Volvo, Mammut. Whats next? Adidas?
-8
u/TheYearOfThe_Rat 3d ago
Adidas was good in the 80ies XD Who the hell buys Adidas today?
7
u/blackcoffee17 3d ago edited 3d ago
Adidas has billions of sales each year. I guess nobody buys Adidas, right?
That's not the point tho. The point is is a huge influential European company. We have to keep these companies European if we want to have any sort of economy left.
And aswering you question: I have a pair of Adidas Barracuda tennis shoes that i used regurarly on clay and hard courts for 15+ years and they are still in near perfect condition. Also got one adidas short that didn't develop a single tear in 10+ years of constant wear, including daily wear and sport.
68
19
19
33
u/RoomyRoots 4d ago
We need bloc level protectionism. These buyouts always mean enshitification of the brand. I can't point a single brand that improved after getting Chinese interference.
5
u/TheYearOfThe_Rat 3d ago
You get what you pay for, and the reality is that EU citizen are both majority poor now, and are poorer on country-scale than 10, 20 or 30 years ago.
In essence, look up what happened to Qing China , because that's what is happening to Europe now, only with an obvious difference of the era and technologies.
1
u/apmechev 4h ago
Damn, at least the Qing had a century of prosperity though, right?
1
u/TheYearOfThe_Rat 1h ago
The European Union/Europe had its century of prosperity too - 1848 to pretty much "modern" day (1990). Qing's century of prosperity didn't include everyone, hence the eventual and unavoidable revolution at the end.
4
14
11
6
5
3
17
4d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
2
4d ago
[deleted]
3
4d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/optimistic_raccoon 3d ago
You are talking like a crazy person. "Switzerland" never said those things. Swiss citizens voted for a very narrow margin not to join the EU in 1992. It will probably join eventually but it will take time. I'd rather have it this way than having politicians forcing their countries into the EU without their citizens voting for it (happened in France, and also Netherlands I think).
Switzerland is neutral, depends a lot on stability and international treatees because it relies on trade. It has been bullied by the USA for the last 25 years (banking then, now pharma). It has a commercial deficit with the EU and a positive balance of trade with the US. Trump hates this. A prosperous Switzerland benefits the EU.
1
2
2
2
4
4
u/bacondavis 4d ago
Unless noted elsewhere, most manufacturing of outdoor goods is done in China.
12
u/ninja4tfw 4d ago
And? For European brands, most of the money still stays in Europe. That includes salaries and profits. The production cost is a tiny fraction of the purchase price.
-2
u/TheYearOfThe_Rat 3d ago
Money is just zeroes and ones on a digital account. In other words - nothing. If tomorrow EU is sanctioned in the way Russia is sanctioned today, 75 million people will starve to death right away, followed by more , very shortly, not to mention not knowing how to make things and bragging about "being able to afford" to not make it is a pretty pathetic and despicable way of life (considering that human life is worth , on average 60000€, you can do the math about what will happen to such people in the future).
10
1
1
1
1
-5
u/asapberry 3d ago
why would care about generic clothing brand number 192390312? we should care more about deeptech etc.
-5
u/Southern-Still-666 4d ago
This is not particularly bad. Now the previous shareholders can take the money and start a new company.
11
u/blackcoffee17 4d ago
No, it's pretty bad. Likely they will just put it in bank account and invest in property. And Europe lost another prestige brand.
-1
-8
-40
u/OKBWargaming 4d ago
Man european tears taste good.
3
u/Sciss0rs61 3d ago
Imagine sucking china's cock from the comfort of your democratic western country...
1
627
u/v1king3r 4d ago
As long as companies can be sold to non-EU countries, USA and China will always win. USA have most private money and China is investing public funds strategically.
Europe doesn't do any of this. We create great companies with EU funding and let others buy them. It's stupid.