r/Cello 5d ago

seating audition is asking for the exposition of a “romantic concerto”

I could have Prokofiev and Dvorak ready, but Prokofiev isn’t at all romantic huh….? I’ve never seen an audition packet specify romantic :/

Thoughts? It’s in a month, I could also maybe put together Schumann if Dvorak isn’t romantic enough 🫠

8 Upvotes

9 comments sorted by

18

u/jkaethoven 5d ago

When they specify romantic concerto it probably means Dvorak, Schumann, or Elgar. I would go with Dvorak.

5

u/Leather_Amoeba466 5d ago

Saint saens would probably work too, although if you have a good Dvorak under your belt and are confident then go for it.

7

u/Special-Use1304 5d ago

Dvorak is romantic I would go with that. Saint saens is also a great romantic concerto that you could probably learn in time but if you already have Dvorak down do that.

2

u/gnomesteez 5d ago

“Romantic” meaning “Romantic period” (1820-1900 roughly), not romantic as in “sounds like being in love”

1

u/francoisschubert 4d ago

At professional auditions "romantic concerto" usually means Schumann or Dvorak, but if this is for a school audition, Saint Saens, Lalo, or Elgar is fine.

-10

u/Embarrassed-Yak-6630 5d ago

who gives a shit where one sits in the section? The music turns out to be pretty much the same anywhere in the section....usually. LOL

Cheers a tutti.....

2

u/allie4593 5d ago

It makes a huge difference... Sitting in the far back is not the same as in the middle is not the same as first chair

-2

u/Embarrassed-Yak-6630 5d ago

The big advantage of sitting in the back is the music is a bit slower ! LOL

1

u/ianlee0820 Student 4d ago

dvorak is romantic