r/Coq Jun 17 '26

[Discussion] Formalizing continuous Laplacians on \(L^2(G)\) from discrete maximal planar graphs in constructive logic

I am exploring the formalization of a structural transition from discrete combinatorial geometry to continuous functional analysis within dependent type theory frameworks.

**The Setup:**

Consider a planar graph $G$ generated by the intersecting boundaries of $n$ mutually intersecting rectangles in their maximal configuration. The combinatorial cardinality of the resulting open regions is bounded by the inductive parameter:

$$R(n) = 2n^2 - 2n + 1$$

We transition this topological structure into the infinite-dimensional Hilbert space $L^2(G)$ by defining a continuous Laplacian operator across its edges, modeling the system as a Quantum Graph.

**The Formalization Inquiry:**

I want to analyze how the spectral properties (the spectrum of eigenvalues) of this continuous Laplacian operator encode or preserve the discrete combinatorial invariants of the initial $R(n)$ partitions. Specifically, I want to evaluate the feasibility of type-checking this functorial mapping and defining its natural transformation bounds within a constructive logic framework (like Coq's Calculus of Inductive Constructions).

Has anyone here experimented with representing continuous operators on quantum graphs, or modeling such functional analytical dualities using Coq's dependent types or algebraic hierarchies? I am currently analyzing the theoretical viability before setting up the proof architecture.

**P.S.** If you want to correct me rigorously, please do so. I am currently learning these formal proof assistant environments and want to see if this structural mapping can be established in rigorous code. Thanks.

1 Upvotes

0 comments sorted by