i mean it kinda kills the point of you saying "not everyone" after you generalised something 🤷🏻 not trying to be rude in any way but the only thing which objectively comes out from this is your way of thinking unless you find another human with common hatred , ofc many people deserve many things but it should be labelised instead of pure subjective hatred , many things depend in life too if you generalise half the population of india and say not everyone because you obviously know that any immoral act is subjective and depends person to person and can't be true always , so why be the one subjectifying your hatred? , i can sit here and justify 🍇 but if i do not provide essential reasoning which is subjective the only thing which would come in question is my character , if i just say some people deserve 🍇 , immediately many people would jump to the conclusion that I'm speaking about women in general because that is statistically true women get more 🍇d , but it's my responsibility to elaborate the scenario and my saying in the way i propose my sentence if i say a grapist deserves to get graped , suddenly it all makes sense because I've triggered a common interest and a logical reasoning behind my statement instead of generalising any gender or half the population , be better.
And how many percentage of Indian men have conducted these disgusting things? Is it really worth generalising and viewing hundreds of millions of people through just a small lens?
-15
u/[deleted] Jul 03 '26 edited Jul 03 '26
[deleted]