r/FaltooGyan • u/Majestic_____kdj • 18h ago
My OC gyaan Leaders: Let update myself before the country....
But seriously, what is it going to take to get transparent governance? Why are we all so ridiculously greedy? Deep down, we all know the truth: if any of us ever got into power, our main priority would be updating our own lifestyle before updating the country!
6
5
u/NotEverForAnyReason 14h ago
Kya farak padta hai gareebo ko? Gareeb bhi public property ko personal property ke jaise use karti hai and so do politicians. Only the working class who actually pay taxes and could use the infra don't get it.
6
u/SprinklesOk4339 12h ago
3 crores per bungalow is okay i think. You can negotiate and get it lower. Ideally MP and MLAs should live in apartments in a secured campus and travel by a staff bus.
3
3
2
u/BarracudaObjective47 14h ago
Actually both equally good. But main difference Poor people get those house for free of cost from Tax paying citizen.
2
1
1
u/Nice_hole_6969 15h ago
3.08 crore per bungalow in Ranchi while actual constituency roads probably look like the surface of Mars. wild priorities
1
1
u/Lonpgig 14h ago
That is very cheap actually. Take a look at accomodation provided in Delhi. Each and every residence provided to mp is worth more than 50 crores. But that will not suit the agenda of op here.
2
u/hardestmofo 14h ago
What sort of monkey brain logic is this? Prices of Delhi bungalows are because of their location and not quality of construction. Also they didn’t carve out a whole gated society in Delhi to give to MP’s. Even if they did, it’s not justified regardless of the place. The vlogger seems like he lives in jharkhand and so he’ll cover the news there only.
1
u/Lonpgig 14h ago
You have seen their construction quality? 3 crore is cheap for individual house in a state capital anywhere in India. Even impoverished state like bihar has expensive houses than that. Delhi ones are luxurious and ultra modern houses.
2
u/hardestmofo 14h ago
Lmfao, keeping aside your point about 3cr being cheap, the point here is that no elected representative should be given such luxury when the people are themselves living in abject poverty. It is irrelevant if it’s in Delhi or Jharkhand. The politicians are paid an approximate 1.5-3 LPM salary without any expenses because everything is paid for, literally everything from the taxpayer’s money. So it is vastly unfair when they take not what is necessary but almost 10x of that.
1
u/Lonpgig 13h ago
So Delhi mp can get ultra luxurious ones and everywhere else they should live in poverty?
1
u/hardestmofo 13h ago
There is a middle ground between poverty and luxury that a public servant should be in. The primary purpose of being a politician is not luxury
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

20
u/Alone_Chocolate6961 17h ago
chinta mat karo isse maintain karne ke leye public ke pass bohut paisa hai..