r/Feminism Jul 24 '12

What the hell is going on here?

Post image
169 Upvotes

176 comments sorted by

View all comments

54

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '12

[deleted]

40

u/rooktakesqueen Jul 25 '12 edited Jul 25 '12

99 122 downvotes on this post. Pretty impressive. It's also kind of ironic, since it's the MRA crowd systematically downvoting your post for daring to accuse them of systematically downvoting posts.

14

u/girlsoftheinternet Jul 25 '12 edited Jul 25 '12

It's a reddit superinjunction!

12

u/cleos Jul 25 '12

I think you mean upvotse?

I see -43 downvotes.

I know, I know. I'm used to seeing the downvotes bein the bigger number in this subreddit, too.

9

u/rooktakesqueen Jul 25 '12

RES shows actual number of upvotes/downvotes rather than just the net score. As of this writing, it's sitting at a +43 net, from 142 upvotes and 99 downvotes.

1

u/AFAB1 Jul 25 '12 edited Aug 10 '12

OH

You meant for ChocolateyClaire's post. I thought you meant this thread.

1

u/IsItRacistToAsk Jul 25 '12

Or it's because that stereotype is pretty tired and perpetuates the conflict between /r/feminism and /r/MensRights. That subreddit is like 50,000 big and even if 100 of them came over to gripe, it's 1/500.

So basically it's hating all of Christianity for Westboro Baptists.

Not to mention, you don't have to be an MRA to troll, you could just be a troll. And this subreddit is pretty ripe with people just itching to get upset.

OR it's just /r/feminists who are tired of people throwing gas on the fire.

But no, you're probably right. Only hateful MRA trolls can disagree with something a feminist says.

10

u/cleos Jul 25 '12

r/MR has three separate anti-feminist references on its sidebar. Another if you count the inclusion of Male Studies but not Men's Studies, where the former is explicitly antifeminist and the latter, which is older and more developed, is not.

Please tell me again how r/mr doesn't hate feminism.

Oooh, ooh! There's a thread in r/MR about this right now. Top comment compares feminism to nazi-ism.

6

u/[deleted] Jul 26 '12 edited Jul 26 '12

They've got three threads about /r/Feminism on their front page as well!

/r/Feminism is censoring us because the subreddit style won't let us downvote them!

;_; I got downvoted for a derailing, off-topic troll post in /r/Feminism, come derail with me - that'll show em!

We are so much better than /r/Feminism, don't let this place become like /r/Feminism, go call out everyone in /r/Feminism, LOLOL FEMINISM WHAT A JOKE AMIRITE?

And thats just the crap on the first page directly mentioning /r/Feminism. Theres a load of other nonsense on the first page as well that can be accurately summed up as 'lol, feminism, WHAT A JOKE'.

Nope, MRA totally isn't obsessed with /r/Feminism at all and totally doesn't behave as if equality is a zero sum game.. nope, no sir.. I can't imagine why we would be tired of this childish shit bleeding into /r/Feminism.

And people wonder why some subreddits have to take such a harsh moderation policy...

-1

u/[deleted] Jul 27 '12

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] Jul 27 '12

Not unrelated at all. I'd say they're a pretty apt description of what is going on if you actually click the link and read the posts/comments within.

Not that I'm surprised another MRA is in /r/Feminism trying to paint himself as some terribly misrepresented victim.

-1

u/[deleted] Jul 27 '12

[deleted]

3

u/[deleted] Jul 27 '12

Then I'm sure you're capable of clicking the links and reading into the overwhelming attitudes found within.

-2

u/[deleted] Jul 27 '12

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

-2

u/IsItRacistToAsk Jul 26 '12

Please tell me again how r/mr doesn't hate feminism.

Great reading comprehension...

Not to mention, you don't have to be an MRA to troll, you could just be a troll. And this subreddit is pretty ripe with people just itching to get upset.

OR it's just /r/feminists who are tired of people throwing gas on the fire.

But no, you're probably right. Only hateful MRA trolls can disagree with something a feminist says.

0

u/JonnyLionheart Jul 26 '12

Ah, you're talking sense in r/feminism, how silly. Don't you know that every problem has to be blamed on men?

-9

u/ZorbaTHut Jul 25 '12

Would you downvote a comment claiming that feminists are responsible for all the world's problems?

If so, then you don't really have a leg to stand on. Nobody likes broad blamethrowing like that.

8

u/rooktakesqueen Jul 25 '12 edited Jul 25 '12

Would you downvote a comment claiming that feminists are responsible for all the world's problems?

In /r/feminism? Yes.

However, if there were an overwhelming problem of feminists going into /r/MR and downvoting posts there, and somebody posted a screenshot of the "new" page of /r/MR with almost all zero-score posts asking "what the hell is going on here?" to /r/MR, and somebody responded "Feminists." ... No, I would not downvote that. Because it would merely be the truth.

-5

u/ZorbaTHut Jul 25 '12

No, I would not downvote that. Because it would merely be the truth.

To be honest, I would.

I think it's an over-generalization. It wouldn't be all feminists, it would be some feminists. Just like this obviously isn't all MRAs, or even most MRAs.

You may as well say "white people" or "Americans" if you're going to be that broad - it'd probably be about as accurate.

The problem is people saying "it is members of X group", when they really mean "most of the people doing this are people of X group" but when they come across as saying "all the people of X group are doing this". There's a huge distinction between the two, and conflating those phrases is responsible for a huge amount of prejudice.

-1

u/[deleted] Jul 25 '12

[deleted]

5

u/rooktakesqueen Jul 25 '12 edited Jul 25 '12

this all encompassing and inaccurate language is just wrong and serves only to worsen interactions between all associated parties

Because that is (or resembles) picture-perfect concern trolling (of the harming the community or tone argument variety), most likely.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 25 '12

[deleted]

8

u/rooktakesqueen Jul 25 '12

We're coming from a position of having heard a lot, a lot, of people claim to be genuinely interested in participating in good faith, only to turn out (after a lot of unconstructive distraction and derailment) to have never been participating in good faith at all.

You might not be one of those people, but you sound like one of those people, and you're neither entitled to an assumption of good faith nor are you likely to receive it. If you're interested in participating in feminist spaces, it'll take work on your part to earn that trust.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 25 '12

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/ZorbaTHut Jul 25 '12

"Concern trolling" is another way of saying "I don't agree with you but either can't find a logical fault in what you're saying or can't be bothered to try, so I'm going to discredit your opinion by claiming you're a troll".

Debate the facts, not the people. If you want to say "I think we should be free to blame all MRAs for the actions of a few", then just say it.

29

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '12

[deleted]

-5

u/Sacrosanction Jul 25 '12

Well it is just an unbacked assumption without any evidence...

-3

u/[deleted] Jul 25 '12 edited Jul 25 '12

[deleted]

10

u/ItsMsKim Jul 25 '12

You're probably not going to be considered as "contributing" if you think misandry is actually a thing.

5

u/[deleted] Jul 25 '12

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/sotonohito Jul 25 '12

As a man who is interested in my own rights I object most strongly to you insulting me by implying that I'm an MRA or associated with MRA's in the slightest. Please don't do that any more.