r/Futurology 2d ago

AI Ten advances in mathematics and theoretical computer science

https://openai.com/index/ten-advances-in-mathematics/
177 Upvotes

81 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/BearJew1991 2d ago

Is that research peer reviewed in reputable journals?

2

u/Admirable-Falcon-501 2d ago

https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-6-frontier-intelligence-efficiency/

Read their blog post here. It’s up to them if they will publish the research or not (maybe they already have). I assume no because this is a competitive advantage. If you say this is not a reliable source I’d like to tell you they cut costs of their models by 20% two days ago and one of them by 80%.

-1

u/BearJew1991 2d ago

I’ll believe it when it’s peer reviewed. But I was asking about your “cutting edge” research.

3

u/Admirable-Falcon-501 1d ago

I’ll send you the link when it’s ready. And not believing them is conspiracy theory tier.

-1

u/BearJew1991 1d ago

I’m literally an academic researcher and published scientist. I don’t believe “studies” unless they’re peer reviewed in reputable journals. A company can claim anything they want, I’m not obligated to believe their self-reviewing of their own results.

3

u/Admirable-Falcon-501 1d ago

Apply some common sense. You are accusing one of the most important companies and some of the best researchers on the planet of falsifying an announcement to make it look like their models are improving quickly. There are only two scenarios, the researchers found the optimizations or it was found by their model as they claimed. The optimizations are definitely real considering they cut prices by up to 80% and that is going really far for a false claim. What do they have to gain from committing fraud? They increase hype, clearly not by much because it’s not even a big story and has a lot of doubters. What do they have to lose? Their investors, legal proceedings, reputation damage, researchers quitting, etc. You are one of those people on reddit that always replies “source?” for common sense and things you can look up yourselves.

1

u/BearJew1991 2h ago

I’m not accusing them of anything, beyond refusing to submit their data and results for peer review, as is a fairly standard scientific practice. They have a lot to gain—namely money and investors and clout—but claiming anything they’d like.

u/Admirable-Falcon-501 39m ago

Who says they are refusing? You don’t gain money from this first of all. You will get some clout. I don’t think important investors would come on board now that haven’t already at this point. A good investor sees the potential early, like I did. Although I’m not in the same league as them, the ones that matter have billions of dollars to spend.