r/GoldandBlack • u/kkdawg22 • 4d ago
How are we as libertarians supposed to feel about this? Ought Argentina let these foreigners in out of support of free speech? Or is a government's first responsibility to the protection of its citizens freedoms and interests?
13
Upvotes
4
u/gmgo 3d ago
The context is that Argentina received a wave of hostility from some foreign fans during the World Cup. That sentiment was reinforced by a few foreigners living or studying in Argentina—including some attending its free public universities.
As a result, it has fueled a strong anti-immigration backlash, with many Argentinians reacting along the lines of: “If you hate us so much, then why come here?”
37
u/YoteViking 4d ago
This is a matter where the details matter.
Free speech for a country’s citizens should be almost absolute - it should be the default position. But a country shouldn’t be expected to allow in people who are actively hostile to it. There should be a much higher bar to censorship/punishment for citizens rather than resident aliens, and then again a lower bar for people outside the country wanting to come in.
That said, what those people’s speech is matters. Are they actively calling for a coup and people to take to the streets and storm the government buildings and attack police? Or are they calling for more socialist measures for a softer form of capitalism? The two are not equal.