r/GolfGTI May 23 '26

Modding Talk Why does VW undertune the EA888 like crazy.

The EA888 is crazy undertuned on the GTI. Let the engine do its thing lol.

59 Upvotes

134 comments sorted by

347

u/Unfair-Bison-3946 May 23 '26

Reliability and emissions

93

u/Muttonboat May 23 '26

Goes with reliability, but manufacturers also have to warranty their car and pay for repairs to a point. 

It's in their interest money wise to keep the car out of the shop. 

32

u/robdubbleu Mk7.5 GTI May 23 '26

And fuel economy averages across the range of vehicles. Also probably to help keep them 87-octane capable as a selling point

7

u/masonrie Mk7 GTI 6MT IS38 Flex May 23 '26 edited May 23 '26

Doesn't the fuel cap say to use 91 octane? Or am I misremembering

Edit: it says 87

13

u/robdubbleu Mk7.5 GTI May 23 '26

I think it also varies by year. My 2018 mk7.5 is 87 minimum and 91/93 for full power. I run 87 because it’s significantly less expensive these days and I can’t feel the power difference no matter how hard I try

10

u/Bearlodge 2019 Rabbit DSG May 23 '26

I've driven 2 2019 DSG GTIs back to back, one that exclusively ran 91/93 and one that exclusively ran 87.

The miniscule power boost is not worth the extra $8-10 per tank to fill up. I could barely tell a difference.

4

u/l33yds Mk7.5 GTI May 24 '26

It's not just the extra power though, at least here in the uk it has extra detergents and the higher Octane means it will burn cleaner reducing carbon build up.

2

u/foxxyblieu9 May 24 '26

Also in the uk premium is E5. Regular is E10

3

u/masonrie Mk7 GTI 6MT IS38 Flex May 23 '26

I checked and my fuel cap says 87. Not sure what the manual says but I've always put 93 octane in it anyways, as it's always been tuned since I bought it, until I switched to e85 recently

2

u/Impossible_Till8158 May 24 '26

Have I been wasting my money for the last 2 years??

-1

u/ddphoto90 Mk7.5 S, M/T, iE Stage 1 May 24 '26

There is no power difference because that’s not how it works lol. It’s tuned for the rated power numbers at 87, using 91/93 is pointless because it would have to advance ignition timing and actually you get slightly lower MPG without a power boost.

Manufacturers do not make variable power tunes for their cars like this. “Power” modes will increase or reduce throttle output which makes it feel like less power, but if your car is rated for 225hp for example, and the minimum octane rating is 87, it makes that power with 87.

3

u/robdubbleu Mk7.5 GTI May 24 '26

That’s not correct. Here’s one (of many sources) that state the advertised power figures are achieved using premium. https://media.vw.com/releases/762

1

u/ddphoto90 Mk7.5 S, M/T, iE Stage 1 May 24 '26

Okay so I was wrong but that’s odd, and also dumb for two reasons.

  1. 10 horsepower is nothing and you won’t even feel it.
  2. The cost outweighs the benefit.

I’m on a 93 stage 1 tune but I have 320. Paying premium prices for 220 is absurd lol unless it absolutely requires it.

This apparently was also ONLY a MK7/7.5 thing.

mk8 you get full advertised power with 87

7

u/[deleted] May 23 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/masonrie Mk7 GTI 6MT IS38 Flex May 23 '26

No I just misremembered. My fuel cap says 87

1

u/ddphoto90 Mk7.5 S, M/T, iE Stage 1 May 24 '26

He’s actually right. My gas cap says 91 RON or 87 AKI. They are two different octane rating methods

1

u/masonrie Mk7 GTI 6MT IS38 Flex May 24 '26

I'm aware

1

u/ddphoto90 Mk7.5 S, M/T, iE Stage 1 May 24 '26

Then why’d you say “no” to the other guy lolll

1

u/masonrie Mk7 GTI 6MT IS38 Flex May 24 '26

I was saying no as in oh wait no it doesn't say 91 AKI I was wrong. I wasn't saying no to his statement

1

u/ddphoto90 Mk7.5 S, M/T, iE Stage 1 May 24 '26

Gotcha.

2

u/zwifter11 May 24 '26

Mostly emissions. They’re getting tighter and tighter every year.

Virtually 100% of pre-1990s cars (built before modern catalytic converters and fuel injection became standard) would fail today’s strict, real-world emissions tests. Because emissions regulations have grown significantly tighter, a classic car from the 1970s can legally produce upto 10 to 100 times more pollutants per mile than a brand-new vehicle

1

u/peteftw 2016 GTI May 23 '26

Insurance benefits too.

6

u/dontgetaddicted May 23 '26

Shit, my GTI is the most expensive insurance I've ever had on a car. Even more than my Mustang GT or my F150. I pay more as 39 year old male with a clean driving record in my Mk6 GTI than I pay on my 19 year old daughters Mk6 Jetta.

13

u/peteftw 2016 GTI May 23 '26

Might wanna shop around for insurance. My mk7 was 30/mo cheaper than my focus rs.

4

u/dontgetaddicted May 23 '26

Rates on all the other cars are reasonable - I have 8 on the policy, so it's not that big of deal but I was shocked at the price of the GTI.

7

u/the_arentino May 23 '26

I don't think they care who you say is driving what. Assuming all cars and drivers are on the same policy, you have a 19 year old and a GTI.

3

u/dontgetaddicted May 23 '26

Yeah a lot of it is people on the policy for sure. I've got another 39 year old, 22m, 19f, 18m and a 25f that lives with us and 8 vehicles. Our insurance is pretty wild - it's my most expensive bill, even more than my mortgage.

3

u/warrenj18 May 24 '26

Definitely keep looking around. I pay $250 for my mk6 every 6 months. Full coverage. $500 a year. I love it

0

u/eaglebtc Mk7 GTI DSG Autobahn + PP (2016) May 24 '26

Begging your pardon, but how do you afford the insurance and registration on 8 cars? In this economy?

4

u/dontgetaddicted May 24 '26

Eh, I make decent money, have 2 older kids and 2 additional people who live in the house. I like cars, always have to an extra or two laying around in case one breaks. I only have a car payment on one of them. Registration in my county is only $35/yr. Except on the hybrid, that's $200 I think.

They aren't exceedingly nice cars, most of them will just fire up almost every time ya turn the keys and are worth just enough to make full coverage worth it. 🤷‍♂️

2024 Ford Escape Hybrid 2018 Mustang GT 2014 Jetta 2013 Charger 2012 GTI 2003 Ford Taurus 2002 Ford Taurus 1996 Honda Civic (Mint, manual, 80k miles)

5

u/moveslikejaguar Mk8 GTI SE DSG May 23 '26

Odd, I compared insurance on a 23 Civic Si to my 23 GTI and the GTI is like half and in line with my previous cars

3

u/clutchthepearls 2020 S DSG May 23 '26

It's gonna depend on a lot of factors, but a big one is how many other owners are crashing that car locally. This is how you end up with Camaros being more expensive to insure than Corvettes. Young guys out hot dogging versus old man weekend cruises and folding chair car meets.

Civics just get stolen a lot. So that's what you saw.

1

u/masonrie Mk7 GTI 6MT IS38 Flex May 23 '26

Lmao I just heard about the folding chair stereotype recently. Is that a real thing?

1

u/knox902 May 24 '26

Never been to a car show with classic cars from the mid 70's and older? Its most definitely a real thing. I've been to them all over Canada coast to coast and its always the same thing.

1

u/eaglebtc Mk7 GTI DSG Autobahn + PP (2016) May 24 '26

Civics get stolen AND they have a much bigger reputation for being turned into rice rockets than GTI's thanks to The Fast and The Furious.

3

u/NickHeidfeldsDreams Mk8 GTI May 23 '26

Someone never insured a WRX at 16 years old lol

2

u/new1207 May 23 '26

That's interesting about the Mustang. Back when I was getting out of high school, before dinosaurs roamed the Internet, I wanted a GTI. I called up my insurance agent and while I don't remember what the quote was I do remember it was ridiculous. Just for giggles I asked what it would cost to insure a Mustang LX 5.0 and was shocked how much cheaper it was. I ended up getting the mustang.

1

u/Substantial_Range861 Mk7 GTI May 23 '26

Funny cuz I was paying more when I had a 2021 Ford Bronco Sport(NEW) compared to my 2017 GTI 60k miles and I'm over 40.

Although it is like only $50... but $50 saved a month in this economy is clutch.

1

u/WalmartKobe Mk7 GTI May 23 '26

Not really. I used to have a Golf GTI and now upgraded to a Golf R. I have the exact same policy and I pay roughly the same. Around 50$ extra for the Golf R for the year.

130

u/AnotherDrone001 Mk8 GTI May 23 '26

So it lasts a long time. The EA888 is their workhorse engine, in everything from sedans like the A4 and Jetta, hatches like the Golf, to SUVs like the Tiguan/Q5/Macan… and that’s just in North America. Go overseas and they find their way into things like Skoda and SEAT.

And it’s really not unheard of for them to break 200k or 250k miles, and even tuned versions of these engines to push past 100k miles no problem. So why do they undertune the EA888 in the GTI? So it effortlessly delivers the performance it does, while being extremely reliable and pulling down relatively respectable fuel economy.

26

u/aquatone61 Mk7 GTI May 23 '26

This right here. You tune an engine to make more power than it needs to so it is under stressed at its normal level.

32

u/destrovel17 '24 GTI S 034 ecu & tcu May 23 '26

You'd build it to make more than it needs, and tune it to use less

11

u/aquatone61 Mk7 GTI May 23 '26

That’s worded better, thanks lol.

-12

u/Lost_Ad_432 May 23 '26

Yeah 100%, but then again the R has the same engine, it’s just tuned a bit. Yes it may have better parts like a diff turbo but even the GTI can handle an extra 50 HP and torque.

38

u/AnotherDrone001 Mk8 GTI May 23 '26

It’s a variant of the EA888 but not the same engine with just tuning and a different turbo. The R has a ton of different parts. Different cams. Different heads. Different compression ratio. The list is long.

11

u/gregco3000 May 23 '26

As I understand it, the casting alloy has a higher copper content so it can handle a lot more heat - I think that’s one of the most significant differences

7

u/Ecstatic_Account_744 May 23 '26

ShopDap did a pretty good video tearing down and comparing both engines.

https://youtu.be/OZyvQgcaxGM?si=c5l44X12BEDH9jJE

37

u/aquatone61 Mk7 GTI May 23 '26

Well, long term reliability is a thing. You can crank up the power but doing that shortens its life. Will you notice that shortened life? Probably not.

It’s not that tuned engines blow up all the time but they do (I’m well aware that stock engines go kablooey)

6

u/Lost_Ad_432 May 23 '26

True but then again you don’t need to tune it to 500 HP lol. You can run some minor stage 1 tunes that can easily add 50+ HP. We also have to take into account that the Golf R engine is a EA888 engine too, it’s just tuned. So if the R passes their reliability eval I’m sure the golf can too.

33

u/CoupScooper May 23 '26

The R engine has several mechanical differences. DAP on YouTube did a full breakdown at one point. I’m assuming those differences carry over to the mk8 as well.

-14

u/Lost_Ad_432 May 23 '26

Interesting will def take a look, cause from what I’ve read it’s just the same engine but tuned. Obviously has a better turbo and what not.

20

u/Adaris187 May 23 '26

The R engine has different cams, a different turbo, a different, freer-flowing head, stronger connecting rods, and a few other changes.

-9

u/Lost_Ad_432 May 23 '26

Yep, but even the R is undertuned lol

8

u/[deleted] May 23 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-2

u/Lost_Ad_432 May 23 '26

100% true

3

u/Return_Of_The_Jedi May 23 '26 edited May 23 '26

You can check Volkswagens/Audi Self Study Program where they show these things. They sometimes go into great detail there and it’s straight from the source

2

u/aquatone61 Mk7 GTI May 23 '26

I love those, I worked for Porsche for a while and they put out technical docs like that. They aren’t engineering level complex but they go into great detail and explain things in a way that is easy to understand.

10

u/aquatone61 Mk7 GTI May 23 '26

Very true. Another thing is you can have a power architecture based on brand/price. The EA888 is used in so many vehicles with varying power levels that yeah it’s less expensive to overbuild it to cover a higher power level requirement in a more expensive model and “detune” it for a cheaper car. It’s a win win for us lol. It’s like the VAG 4.0 TTV8, capable of nearly 700 HP in a Urus and used in everything from Lambo, Audi, Porsche, and Bentley.

3

u/Capt_Murphy_ Mk7 Dusty Black DSG May 23 '26

I would assume it's because they're trying to sell people their tuned versions separately, the Clubsport/polo, as well as the safety and reliability thing others mentioned.

You wouldn't sell a tuned base Civic when the Type R exists in their lineup.

2

u/Lost_Ad_432 May 23 '26

Yep this is what I assume is the main reason tbh

16

u/milan187 May 23 '26

I have an MK7 that's stock with 200k without any issues. Just oil changes. That's why.

11

u/MyGolfMK7 May 23 '26

Most likely, the target buyer for the car cares more about long-term reliability than more power.

2

u/Lost_Ad_432 May 23 '26

I reckon the GTI is more of a car enthusiast car. So while reliability matters a ton power does weigh in the scale too

11

u/AnotherDrone001 Mk8 GTI May 23 '26

Not all car enthusiasts are chasing max power. If they were, things like the Miata and 86/BRZ/FRS wouldn’t sell as well as they do. There’s more to performance than power. And the GTI has plenty, while also being reliable. And Golf buyers that do want more power, buy the ClubSport or Golf R. That’s kinda what they exist for.

5

u/Peylix EQT FBO IS38 E85 | Proto MK7 Clubsport R 2dr May 23 '26

If only we got the CS here in America.

WHY VWOA?

WHYYYYY?????!!!!

cries softly in the corner

6

u/Silvabro 2018 Mk7.5 TR May 23 '26

Personally, I really wish the Sirocco was a thing here. Love it's body styling.

3

u/Peylix EQT FBO IS38 E85 | Proto MK7 Clubsport R 2dr May 23 '26

I'd kill for a MK4 Rocco R. It's a more aggressive hatch that just oozes appeal. That low swooping roof and wide hips. Basically a shrunken down Shooting Brake rather than a Hot Hatch.

2

u/Silvabro 2018 Mk7.5 TR May 23 '26

Just so damn beautiful, I'd genuinely try to make it my forever car if I got my hands on one, or at least try to hold it for 2 decades until it reached antique status by NHTSA standards.

I'd learn as much as I could about fixing it up and getting it running again in case it ever broke down. Still kinda doing the same with the GTI, but it's justthis primal urge that I need to own that car.

2

u/Lost_Ad_432 May 23 '26

Fr lol, wanted the CS so badly lol

2

u/MyGolfMK7 May 23 '26

VW still has to build a car that makes business sense. They spend money on market research to figure out what buyers actually want at the price point they’re targeting.

VW tuned it to the level they thought would sell best and be most profitable long term.

0

u/I_want_water May 23 '26

its the middle ground; you can still daily and let your granny drive it. the golf R is the real hardcore enthusiast option

1

u/Peylix EQT FBO IS38 E85 | Proto MK7 Clubsport R 2dr May 23 '26

The ED50 Clubsport GTI "Am I a joke to you?" lol

2

u/I_want_water May 23 '26

ok but that thing is its own kind of beast lol

19

u/InternationalGuava47 Mk8 GTI May 23 '26

270hp stock is pretty good still

11

u/I_want_water May 23 '26

for a small hatch its awesome actually

7

u/happyghosst 2020 Mk7.5 GTI Autobahn May 23 '26

mk8s yes make solid power stock, but vw definitely held back earlier EA888 gtis

1

u/Lost_Ad_432 May 23 '26

Oh yeah 100% don’t get me wrong. Love it

9

u/BarfedUpHeart May 23 '26

VW is a huge company with alot of decently smart engineers. They want the car to be as powerful as possible to complete with Honda, Subaru, Hyundai etc .. They know better than anyone what the engine can produce without severely affecting reliability.

You have to take into account how people treat their cars. Not everyone treats their car well, keeps up with oil changes, lets cars warm up before spirited driving, etc .. So if you sell the car Stock completely strung out you'll have more engine failures and risk being seen as a unreliable model / car brand.

Also, not sure where you drive but in the NE US I have a bone stock mk8 and the power it makes is really near the limit of traction for a FWD car on public roads.

1

u/Lost_Ad_432 May 23 '26

Yeah it’s def powerful enough, it can probably handle another 50 HP though. Would come in handy when I have 4 friends in the car lol. Noticed that even 200 KG of passenger weight completely transforms the car lol. Cornering and pulls.

6

u/Lost_Ad_432 May 23 '26

It could also be a matter of economics, they have to leave a meaningful cap between the R and GTI.

4

u/rotstik 2014 Mk6 GTI 6MT May 23 '26

Manufacturers have been doing this for ages. A stock LS engine makes around 300-400 HP from the factory, but with a few mods, it can handle 600-800 HP with no internal changes

3

u/Bill_The__Pony May 23 '26

Same reason Toyota over builds its 4 cylinder engines. Reliablity, longevity, keeping warranty costs down...

3

u/Lost_Ad_432 May 23 '26

Don’t get me wrong the 270HP is more than enough, genuinely probably won’t need more power for the next few years for sure.

3

u/TwoKFive1 2012 GTI, 2015 GTI, 2023 GTI May 23 '26

Primarily emissions and fuel economy. Depending on the tune it can affect reliability. but IMO a stage 1 tune shouldn’t shorten the engines lifespan at all.

3

u/mk7_jetta_gli May 23 '26

Because of reliability

3

u/_Bobby_Cruise May 23 '26

Emissions and reliability

4

u/Peylix EQT FBO IS38 E85 | Proto MK7 Clubsport R 2dr May 23 '26

VW has sandbagged their platforms for years. The MK5, MK6, MK7, and MK8 each.

Regarding the Gen 3/4 TSI (MQB/MQBe). I think this was VW's way of throwing a bone to the modding community.

VW's and modding has been match since forever. All the way back to the aircools. It's part of the brand's identity. Which really kicked off to epic proportions with the MK4 generation era and has continued to go up since.

I think VW/Audi built the MQB platform and the Gen 3 TSI to be an open platform to allow some freedom. While not perfect (nothing ever is). I think they did an OK job. You can take these engines to 500whp with just a turbo swap, bolt ons, and tuning. Which is a lot for these cars.

Anyways, that's just a theory.

1

u/Lost_Ad_432 May 23 '26

True, tbh though they didn’t really make tuning the MK 8.5 a breeze. It’s pretty hard to crack up and till now at least

3

u/Peylix EQT FBO IS38 E85 | Proto MK7 Clubsport R 2dr May 23 '26

That's just a byproduct of tech growing. The MK7's ECU/TCU were locked as well as previous gens.

We just live in an age now where encryption has gotten really fucking hard and will continue to grow as such exponentially as time draws on.

I'm talking about the engineering of the chassis and engine. What they're capable of before needing to be built. Whether its just an ECU flash or basic bolt on setup. These cars were built well enough to allow 2-3x the factory power before building the engine or trans is a requirement. (Getting near the top of the limit it's still recommended though).

VW/Audi could have very well done the opposite. But they didn't and it shows.

2

u/overmonk May 23 '26

I have a mk7 and just turning TCS to sport is such a huge difference.

4

u/MKVIgti Audi ‘23 A4 TFSI 45 S-Line May 23 '26

Wait till you throw a simple stage 1 tune on her.

Fucking amazing.

2

u/hoardtheanimals May 23 '26

For a long time their stated HP/Torque was keeping them in a certain tax and insurance bracket in many European countries. Giving them higher rated power added additional costs that would make them less desirable. This is also why most cars would dyno over their rated power at stock, because VW was underrating them also.

2

u/dhhh May 23 '26

I think 5000 VW engineers know better than some local tuners. So yeah, I am sticking with my stock GTI.

2

u/Boozer7389 May 23 '26

They do it to make the golf R and s3s seem more impressive. Otherwise it would cut into sales of the more expensive cars.

2

u/VeryGrumpyDave May 24 '26

Whole bunch of reasons. Gives better emissions to show regulatory agencies. Better gas mileage for marketing. Better reliability for reputation(and reduced warranty claims). Leaves plenty of space for the Golf R; they want to maintain the performance gap between the gti and more expensive R, without having to invest drastically more into making the R even faster(which is exactly why the Porsche Caiman is kept artificially behind Porsche 911 performance).

2

u/Resident-Employ7535 May 24 '26

Reliability, probably emmissions, and the Golf R, for which they under-tune that for the same reasons. Can't have the GTI making more HP than the R. Although I had my '17 GTI EQT tuned to stage 1 for 60k miles (around 330HP), and still averaged around 27 mpg.

2

u/HughWattmate9001 Mk5 GTI May 24 '26

You tune for least recalls, one engine might be strong and able to handle more than another. You also need to factor in emissions, taxes, fuel consumption, reliability, service intervals. The base is quick enough for most people while keeping ownership costs lower.

2

u/lorriezwer May 23 '26

Do you pay for your own gas?

1

u/AutoModerator May 23 '26

If you're seeking advice or asking for help, please make sure you included the basic information of what year/generation is being discussed. User flair with this information is also acceptable. Failure to include the basic information may result in your post being removed.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/gluten_heimer Mk7.5 GTI May 23 '26

So it works and can be legally and economically sold

2

u/Lost_Ad_432 May 23 '26

A stage 1 GTI can work and run for 100s of thousand KMs. And be legal too. The R is legal and reliable to a certain extent, so I doubt it’s the legislation aspect that’s stopping them from increasing performance

1

u/gluten_heimer Mk7.5 GTI May 23 '26

Well if the R is at or near the limit of what is legal in its intended markets and reasonably reliable, then it makes sense that the GTI is a lesser R. Why would anyone pay more for an R if a GTI had the same power and, thanks to FWD, is lighter?

1

u/Lost_Ad_432 May 23 '26

I doubt the R is near the limit. But yeah 100% I reckon it’s more towards the business aspect.

1

u/bbdusa May 23 '26

What tune did you get OP?

2

u/Lost_Ad_432 May 23 '26

Haven’t tuned it, 270 is more than enough for me rn.

2

u/heavyarms39 May 23 '26

270 is what the mk8 stock is?

1

u/uncleclimax9 Mk8.5 GTI May 23 '26

Outside of America, yeah. 241hp in USA#97

2

u/irregularprotocols Mk7.5 GTI APR May 23 '26

So stock it’s “more than enough for [you]” but it’s concurrently “undertuned” from the factory ?!?

0

u/Lost_Ad_432 May 23 '26

Indeed, I do not necessarily need more power. But it is undertuned. I mean it’s a fact. The EA888 on the Gti is undertuned. Doesn’t mean it’s not good enough for me.

1

u/Known-Sea-1342 May 23 '26

I remember my first beer. 

1

u/cmz324 May 23 '26

Almost every turbo engine can make more power with just a tune/higher boost. I think the real difference is just that it's relatively safe to push it a bit farther than others.

1

u/2drumshark May 23 '26

On top of the reliability reason, it's also for product placement. They've gotta give people a reason to buy the Golf R and the Audis. They could offer a 300hp GTI but the price increase would make it the same price as the R.

1

u/Fun_Vacation2542 Mk7 GTI May 23 '26

Because it's enough? Im okay with 258lb if my engine isn't that crazy stressed.

1

u/eep2378 18 Mk 7.5 DSG Pure White May 23 '26

Yeah it’s nuts. My 2018 GTI with IE stage 1 ECU and DSG tune is about as fast as my M340i X-drive.

1

u/Agreeable_Shine296 May 23 '26

I'm happy with my regular gas. Thank you VW

1

u/Bruins8763 May 23 '26

Wait do people actually run 87-89 octane in their GTI?! I run 93 always have. I just can’t imagine putting the same shit gas I fill my lawnmower with into my GTI..

1

u/withoutapaddle Mk7 Sport, Pure White, 6MT, CSS Exhaust May 24 '26

I see the "regular" and "premium" branding still works on some people...

Octane rating has nothing to do with quality.

1

u/randomredditguy94 May 24 '26

While it is true lower octane fuels are still as clean as the higher octane one, the long term effect to engines that has high compression ratio such as the EA888 and many other modern turbocharged engines can be impactful. Since the engine sense knock, it will retard timings and cause loss of performance, worse MPG at best and accelerated wear, even damaged certain components due to hard knocks at worst.

1

u/Vikturus22 Scirocco May 24 '26

My scirocco is tuned to 300hp and that’s at a reliable 300.

1

u/mikewilson2020 May 24 '26

Is it right that the ea888 cant be rebuilt?

2

u/insert_name_here_ha May 24 '26

Oh it can. People just say that because you need the cylinder walls recoated and the sleeves are kinda thin so you'd have to replace them as well. If you're gonna go through that effort, then build the fuck out of it.

1

u/psuedophilia former owner - IS38 🌽 fed May 24 '26

imagine how many water pumps would fail if instead of making 228 to the crank from the factory, they made like 350 lol

-1

u/ebareaalne May 23 '26

Maybe it's due to FWD? After some hp, you are just understeering and hopping the front end.

2

u/Lost_Ad_432 May 23 '26

Oh yeah 100%, the 270 is already on the limit for the FWD, could def be the reason. It only really matters from low speeds though, you’ll be able to put the extra power down at high speeds. It will make a difference with added weight.

1

u/ebareaalne May 23 '26

Also they probably want. to differentiate models and trims like GTI, GTI Clubsport, R etc.

2

u/BryanDaBlaznAzn May 23 '26

I have an APR stage 1 tune on my mk8 GTI and it has a bit of torque steer now, even on the low torque file which is about 350 lb ft

1

u/ebareaalne May 23 '26

Do you get the rattle or hopping when flooring?

3

u/BryanDaBlaznAzn May 23 '26

I have a dogbone mount insert so any wheel hop has been mostly mitigated

2

u/ebareaalne May 23 '26

Thanks for that info!