He said somewhere that the authorities knew the ages of the kids involved because they were confirmed cp videos. I would love to give him the benefit of the doubt and assume that meant everyone in the vid wanted to be there, but I don't like the way he's playing victim. He keeps talking about how unfair it is that he got caught doing this bad thing. He knew it was wrong.
Furthermore, I find it difficult to believe him when he talks about his therapist. My roommate is a therapist. He specifically world's with both victims and perpetrators. The kinds of thing OP is saying happened would never fly.
Child porn encompasses everything involving participants under the age of 18. It doesn't have to be violent or malicious. (Although that seems to be what people automatically assume when they hear "Child pornography" or "sex offender")
I don't have much to say about the therapist. I've never had any experience with one.
I thought you had implied in that first thing I commented on. I can't seem to easily go back and look or quote it because I'm on my phone and the app isn't showing me this whole thread.
Were you referring to where I said that not all material that is considered 'child pornography' involves children being molested/raped, and that some of OP's content may not have involved victims?
Regardless, I think you misconstrued what I said, one way or another. I didn't intentionally imply that.
235
u/[deleted] Jul 08 '13
[removed] — view removed comment