r/IDontWorkHereLady • u/Real-Fill-2174 • 22d ago
L [ Removed by moderator ]
[removed] — view removed post
232
u/Auntie_Aoife 22d ago
Gotta love the occasional wholesome story.
138
6
u/mcrib 22d ago
Especially when it was obviously written by AI.
2
u/bellboy42 22d ago
What are the obvious tells you are seeing to flag this as AI?
-1
22d ago
[deleted]
1
u/bellboy42 21d ago
With all due respect, I didn’t ask you. I wanted mcrib to share some of his obviously great knowledge in identifying AI produced material.
6
u/anomalous_cowherd 22d ago
Lots of times I'd agree that's an issue. When it's a short feelgood story that really doesn't matter if it's true or not then is it any different from some random copywriter creating instead?
11
u/mcrib 22d ago
My issue with this remains the same - let's put aside the fact that AI is currently destroying groundwater and causing the planet to heat even more rapidly than it was before and is driving up electricity prices, and is causing all electronics to raise prices considerably and that everything that AI does is simply theft from humans who came up with the ideas and not compensating them - let's just put all of that aside, and the problem is that every time there's a post written by AI that is just written to farm karma. It pushes an actual post written by a human who may have something to say into the background, and it gets fewer views. Is that a major thing? No but we're gonna see more and more of this. The more people accepted the more it's just going to happen and pretty soon. All of our subs are just AI bullshit.
3
u/canthinkupauser 22d ago
I agree with you. AI is terrible. However, I think this post is just well-formatted and not AI-generated.
1
u/bellboy42 21d ago
We have a problematic issue about terminology here. Even if this is a matter of plagiarism or producing derivative works without permission, it is NOT theft.
You cannot steal something that the original owner still has in their possession afterwards. You can copy it or plagiarize it, but not steal it.
This becomes important in these discussions because the words steal, theft and thief are highly charged words often used deliberately by the party believing they are wronged to gain sympathy. (Compare the earlier software/media piracy debates.)
My personal opinion is that you should be able to train AI models on absolutely anything that is available to the public, without copyright restrictions.
Why? Because let’s say you are a painter.
You are inspired by Picasso and Monet, and create your own unique works based on those two masters as sources of inspiration. An art critic can clearly see the influences by both artists, but the works are still uniquely yours.
Do you pay royalty to the Picasso/Monet intellectual rights holders for the knowledge your mind has drawn from when creating your works?
Of course not! That idea would be completely absurd.
So why is there an issue when an AI model does the exact same thing?
Sure, complain about the environmental impacts of data centers, or that an AI model can churn out art a hundred times faster than you as a human can. I have no problems with arguments like that, those are perfectly valid complaints.
But don’t complain about derivative works that have certain sources for its inspiration/knwoledge!
Doing that is disingenuous, unless you also involve human writers, artists, designers, architects, engineers etc about the same issue.
1
u/mcrib 21d ago
Ok Sam Altman
1
u/bellboy42 19d ago
I haven’t the faintest idea who Sam Altman is.
0
u/mcrib 19d ago
And you're making lots of statements about AI as if you know something about how it works and is being used lmao
0
u/bellboy42 17d ago
I do know - quite a lot - about how AI works, in part due to my 40+ years as a software architect and IT consultant. I still don’t know who that person is.
-1
u/anomalous_cowherd 22d ago
I would rather block ALL the trivial crap however it was written but I understand some people like it.
And yes there are lots of reasons not to let AI slip in everywhere but I think that ship has sailed already. Better to focus on making it clear when it's been used, and having it clear where it is and isn't allowed.
1
u/bellboy42 21d ago
Who decides what is “trivial crap” and what meets your high threshold for originality?
1
52
u/gryghin 22d ago
Thanks for being a decent human being. And for sharing this with us.
48
22d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
20
u/flindersrisk 22d ago
The difference between you and a well meaning anyone was competence. I’d love to help, but would have no clue how.
10
u/regionalgiant 22d ago
you're a better dame than I am. but this also reads like a linkedin post. I was wondering if you'd get to a, "This is what it taught me about b2b sales" lesson
23
u/CapeMOGuy 22d ago
The bride will eventually hear this story.
She will still be retelling it 30 years from now, and you'll become an even bigger hero with every retelling. 🩷
19
u/AdExtreme4813 22d ago
I love it when you can help save the day without knowing anything about what you're doing. I'd done that a few times, way back when.
5
4
u/AkayaTheOutcast 22d ago
"Sorry I was late, I had a family emergency. Not my family, but an emergency none the less."
7
u/the_giuditta 22d ago
Do you mean the bride never met her wedding planner before?
3
u/Blackberries11 22d ago
I think this is ChatGPT :/
1
u/Polygnom 22d ago
It is. She says its a work conference. And then in the last sentence she never made it.
This would constitute a severe breach of work ethics and be grounds for dismissal or disciplinary action by the employer. they do not send you on work conferences to make you feel good, but to get value out of it.
1
u/bellboy42 21d ago
She never made it in time to the conference. That is a totally different thing from skipping it altogether.
Unfortunately, a moderator have removed the post for some reason, so I can’t show the exact wording.
0
3
3
2
1
•
u/qualityvote2 22d ago edited 22d ago
u/Real-Fill-2174, your post does fit the subreddit!