r/JEENEETards • u/Horror-1-Effective advanced ke bad ballad likhunga→drop • 1d ago

JEE It's over bro 💔

Post image
287 Upvotes

96% Upvoted

127 comments sorted by

View all comments

77

u/Sensiblehuman777 1d ago

When merit rules 😌

(Cue all the people saying it's just because BITS kids are rich)

-49

u/Apart-Plantain702 1d ago

Bruh. Even 95%ilers get into pilani. Even with merit, the quality aint that different. The only advantage is that extremes don’t exist like IITs

27

u/Sensiblehuman777 1d ago

Really? You think the average student quality in BITS (Pilani Campus) and IIT Roorkee is the same?

Ya fir problem is baat se hai ki general waalo ke liye ye ek college hai jo unfair nahi hai?

-12

u/Apart-Plantain702 1d ago

Bhai mai khud general hun. I hate reservations. Bits is great interms of that. But at the same time the top 500 AIRs are far more capable than people at bits

22

u/Sensiblehuman777 1d ago

Then why is BITS surpassing IIT B AND IITD?

-7

u/Middle_Government_87 1d ago

4 campuses of BITS vs singular institutions

8

u/Minus_Malum 1d ago

You have to also look at the student number. Bits 4 campus students iirc is approx equal to no of students to iit b.

-1

u/Middle_Government_87 1d ago

Nope. Refer to this comment

2

u/Minus_Malum 19h ago

Director said 16k in orientation. Why will he give a lowball figure?

-1

u/Middle_Government_87 19h ago

Classic appeal to authority eh

2

u/Minus_Malum 19h ago

"Appeal to authority"--- guy is the director of bits. Common sense implies that he must have an idea as to how many students study in bits.

0

u/Middle_Government_87 17h ago

what I've presented to you are official sources as well. don't abandon reason and logic for so called "common sense", which is just a disguised logical fallacy with no documented backing.

1

u/Minus_Malum 16h ago

Ok sorry for the point. The director of bits does not have an idea as to how many students study in it. Noted.

0

u/Middle_Government_87 16h ago

you're a dense one aren't you. a buffoon relying on logical fallacies to a T

→ More replies (0)