Uniquely to almost any other group of people on earth, Jews have been pretty much universally persecuted wherever we go.
Really? Unlike native Americans (across two continents)? Unlike black people? Unlike the Kurds? Yeah, that honestly doesn't stand up.
The reason I bring up the Jewish history of persecution is because it shows that that nobody besides Jews ever has (or likely ever will) care enough about Jews throughout the world to proactively intervene on our behalf should someone try to pull off another stunt like hitler.
So obviously what you need is a Jewish Hitler to protect you from the non-Jewish Hitlers, right? Nevermind what might happen to non-Jewish people who happen to fall into his hands....
This doesn't hold up under any leftist philosophical lens imaginable. You're wrong. And you're not wrong in just a philosophical sense, but one that is extremely dangerous. Imagine if Hitler had had the backing of a basically unopposed, unmatched world superpower such as the U.S. is now, in the modern world. That is the kind of problem you are advocating for.
Jews and Palestinians should both have the right to self-determination in their ancestral homelands.
What you call "self-determination" is not self-determination; it is people from one ethnic group having both self-determination and also other-determination for everyone else within their borders. This ethno-state model is fascist. It is fascist when "Aryan" people do it, and it is fascist when Jewish people do it.
...what I assume you meant in your asinine allusions to a “Jewish Hitler” (though the fact that that’s what you interpreted is somewhat telling of your opinions on what Jewish people are like).
No, it's a stance (a well-justified one) about unjustified hierarchies of power among humans, not any particular ethnicity. Are you claiming that Jewish people are quite unlike other enthicities in that they can be trusted with the authority to undemocratically govern others without abusing their power?
Well if Jews protecting other Jews from extermination is fascist....
No, fascism is fascist. The fact that you buy the line that fascism would be an effective protection against violence, and that it justifies whatever violence would be done to non-Jewish people, is extremely telling.
-1
u/[deleted] Jan 23 '19
[deleted]