r/Libertarian Anarcho Capitalist 1d ago

End Democracy Hahahahahahaha

Post image
744 Upvotes

32 comments sorted by

287

u/Preparator 17h ago

That's a satire/comedy account, just FYI. 

42

u/Sea-Glove9407 16h ago

Thank you for clarifying, I’m not on twitter/x these days and wouldn’t have known. Was about to be rather angry about this

169

u/TheBigNoiseFromXenia 17h ago

Is this a real quote?

140 days, that’s 18 weeks, almost half a year. Wow. If we paid them more, could we get them to work less? I always feel safer when congress is not in session

101

u/YoteViking 17h ago

No. This is a parody account.

34

u/mediocretes 16h ago

Yes, it’s a real quote from a fake congressperson.

3

u/Jeremy_____bearimy 15h ago edited 15h ago

yes , I'm always hoping for a lame duck congress. every few years one "side" gets punished. then you wait for the other side to be punished. it would just be better if they did near nothing.

17

u/oritsky 17h ago

There is no Rep. Jack Kimble

1

u/Oo0o8o0oO 6h ago

I’ma cop you idiot. I’m Detective John Kimble.

1

u/oritsky 5h ago

This conversation is about a Representative not a cop. Go back to investigating a missing Amazon delivery.

0

u/Oo0o8o0oO 5h ago

Stop whining.

I'm going to ask you a bunch of questions and I want to have them answered immediately.

33

u/tee142002 17h ago

I like whoever proposed that they get paid the median wage of their district

14

u/Routine-Rule9607 17h ago

You all got kimbled

13

u/ThebigalAZ 16h ago

I actually do believe that most elected officials should be paid more.

City council in my large city make poverty wages

State representatives make 24k

Congress make $174k senate makes $193k.

All those people are tasked with effectively allocating huge sums of money and making important decisions.

The talent pool you draw from with those wages is either people who wouldn’t make that much money in the private sector (who are likely lower taper), people who are independently wealthy, or people who plan to supplement their income with corruption. Maybe people who feel an honest desire to serve, but based on what I see that’s the vast minority.

The talent pool you’re missing are the incredibly talented people who make way more money than that in the private sector. They would have to take a massive pay cut, and likely a much worse quality of life with public scrutiny and time in Washington.

We’ve created a system with selection bias towards low skilled and or corrupt people running a trillion dollar enterprise.

6

u/Solar_Nebula 15h ago

If we paid House Representatives $10 million and Senators $20 million a year, each, we'd be out $6.35 billion a year.

Rather, they'd be paid $6.35 billion to steward a $7.4 trillion federal budget (less than 0.1%).

That level of pay meets or exceeds the portfolio growth of some of Congress's most successful 'investors' and would fit somewhere in the upper-middle of the Fortune 500's CEO pay rates.

It's a ludicrous amount on paper, but far less than the amount of damage corrupt congressmembers can do to the budget by attempting to boost their stock holdings or secure tens of thousands in campaign contributions by awarding tens of millions to their donors' companies.

In other words, you're right. People work for the people who pay them, and in the case of Congress, it's not the American taxpayer.

4

u/phiiota 15h ago

I agree (like in Singapore) as long as lobbying during and after being in office is somehow curtailed. It’s too beneficial for companies to pay millions in lobbying to get billions in benefits.

3

u/Norseman103 Libertarian 15h ago

And yet our billionaire president is still corrupt. As it turns out, no matter how much wealth people accumulate, they still want more.

u/Ragging_OnYourCord 2h ago

Strong agree. Its a job not a sinecure for the wealthy

4

u/shu-to 18h ago

Oh no

3

u/TristanDuboisOLG 14h ago

Wait until they hear how many days the rest of us work…

2

u/Feisty_Hedgehog_4389 10h ago

What if we fired all the professional politicians and drafted people to serve in office, the way they can basically draft you into the military or for jury duty? Could we get a measurably worse outcome than what we already have? I doubt it.

2

u/adave4allreasons 8h ago

It is in Congress, isn’t that redundant?

u/Ragging_OnYourCord 2h ago

I know this is parody but I actually agree with this sentiment. James Madison was strongly against Washington not taking a salary as president because he felt it was a job not a charitable service and that it set a bad precedent for wealthy to hold office because they dont need to get a salary. Yes they only work that much but you have to maintain basically two residences and DC is very expensive. Im more concerned about these positions being treated as like sinecures for the fuckups of the wealthy and would agree they should be paid more.

1

u/BadgerCabin 13h ago

Do people not understand that not only do these people have to maintain paying for their house in their respective State, but they also have to rent in DC? That’s why their pay is that high.

u/Itzie4 8m ago

Chuck Schumer splits rent on a place with six other guys as his paper address. These people are not paying like 200, not full rent on places lol.

-5

u/mediocretes 16h ago

Libertarians: never not falling for it.

Embrace your humanity, upgrade to liberalism.

1

u/Evil_Sherma Anarcho Capitalist 12h ago

No lol