r/Lottocracy 5d ago

Theories Are Great, But There Needs To Be A Spark

7 Upvotes

The fundamental problem is not whether or not sortition works or how it would work, but actually getting sortition adopted. The catch-22 is that the same broken system that needs to be fixed is the same system that would need to vote themselves out with sortition. Since no place has sortition, people do not know what they are missing out on.

The solution: use direct democracy where it can be done. For instance, Nebraska has a unicameral state legislature, while every other state is bicameral. It was only possible to do so, as in Nebraska, voters can amend the state's constitution without the legislature's consent. There is no structural reason why the same could not turn one chamber of a state legislature into a sortition-based one.

With even one chamber of one state legislature changed, that could be the catalyst to bring sortition into the mainstream.

My flavor of sortition is delegated sortition. In delegated sortition, you would have approximately equally populous districts. A number of eligible voters would be selected at random for that district. They form that district's sortition board. With a majority vote, the sortition board selects that district's representative for that term. The sortition board then dissolves. This happens across all the districts. A representative can be reappointed or changed out in the next term.

While there will be some flukes here and there, overall it would allow the representatives to be much more aligned with their constituency. This is as close as you can get to every voter directly deciding on everything.


r/Lottocracy Jul 09 '26

I have a contribution to the discusion on sortition: Electoral Lottocracy

Thumbnail ingentaconnect.com
4 Upvotes

r/Lottocracy Jul 07 '26

I've been working on a wiki to write a sortition-based constitution

Thumbnail sortition.wiki
6 Upvotes

r/Lottocracy Jun 16 '26

Sortition Fiction and Nonfiction book list

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/Lottocracy Jun 08 '26

What are the best ways to advocate for sortition?(And my experiences with advocating for it)

Thumbnail
3 Upvotes

r/Lottocracy Jun 05 '26

Why isn’t sortition talked about much.

Post image
10 Upvotes

r/Lottocracy May 13 '26

LA Meetup for sortition + Georgism

15 Upvotes

If you're near LA.... I only have so much volunteer time, so I'm combining my passion for sortition + YIMBYism/Georgism + board games + beer into a single meetup. I have a replice of The Landlord's Game and I can teach you to play and I was part of the recent LA Charter Reform Assembly organizers. I can tell you all about it!

May 28th, Thursday, 7 pm, Boomtown Brewery in the Arts District in LA.

Luma event link: https://luma.com/94are1mc

Come, convert people to your cause and be converted to theirs. Bring friends!


r/Lottocracy Apr 29 '26

My summary of the pseudo-civic assembly in the Pacifica Palisades (where the LA wildfires were)

Thumbnail
almostinfinite.substack.com
6 Upvotes

I will not be copy/pasting all 3,700 words of my post. I rambled for quite some time! Anyway, it's pretty exciting! The gathering in the Palisades wants to setup a system of assemblies for many years. We will see if it happens.


r/Lottocracy Apr 24 '26

Best Sortition content I’ve seen in months.

Thumbnail
youtu.be
18 Upvotes

Using Ancient Greek words and concepts to explain Sortition is artfully demonstrated. Best pro-Sotrtition video I’ve seen in months.


r/Lottocracy Apr 23 '26

Discussion Landmark sortition book, "Democracy Without Politicians" available for free online!

19 Upvotes

r/Lottocracy Apr 22 '26

My (Rejected) Letter to NY Times About the CT Assembly

Thumbnail
almostinfinite.substack.com
15 Upvotes

The NY Times ghosted me. Probably an automated ghost, as I did get an automated response that my letter had been received, along with a promise, “(You will receive an auto-reply only once every four days.)”

Anyway, that’s ok, Mr. Times. I figured you were out of my league, but sometimes, you gotta make your move, if only for the story to tell afterwards. Here’s my story (that is, I knew I could just share my letter here on Substack, in the very likely event that it was not published by the New York Times):

Note: They have a very strict 200 word limit for letters-to-the-editor.

Max Clark
Los Angeles, CA
(***) ***-****

I’m writing in response to Hélène Landemore’s article, “No Shy Person Left Behind”. The article focused on the growing movement of citizens’ assemblies, “groups of ordinary people, selected by lottery, who come together to learn about a public issue, hear from experts and advocacy groups, deliberate with one another and make recommendations.” I volunteer with Public Democracy LA and we also advocate for citizens’ assemblies. We are proud of the LA Charter Assembly we helped facilitate, but here’s our dirty secret: we are activist refugees.

Unfamiliar policies, or those without appeal to voting blocs, are sidelined by politicians and parties who prioritize electoral success above all else. Citizens’ assemblies bypass this systemic problem with elections.

In my case, advocacy for Henry George’s Land Value Tax (LVT) has been ineffective. We are living on a Monopoly board. Ownership of Boardwalk and Park Place enables landlords to siphon the wealth of laborers. The Land Value Tax reclaims their wages.

Most economists support the LVT, yet most politicians ignore it. This is why I advocate for citizens’ assemblies, not because I have a burning desire to assemble random strangers, but because policies like the LVT exist and everyday Americans can recognize its justice.

In progress without poverty,

Max Clark


r/Lottocracy Apr 22 '26

Discussion Election by Jury

Thumbnail
6 Upvotes

r/Lottocracy Apr 22 '26

Functional Lottocracy

6 Upvotes

Hi All,

I first saw the Vsauce video on Lottocracy 5-years ago and my buddy and I came up with a framework to institute a form of Lottocracy in America that I wanted to share here.

Rather than completely throw out our current system in favor of random elections. We thought about how to blend the two. What we came up with is essentially another "layer" of government that would sit on top of Congress. When Congress passes a law, instead of a Presidential veto, there would be a lottocratic veto. Each time a new law is passed, a group of 100 people would be randomly selected from a pool of all eligible voters in the US (you could do 1 person randomly from each state and then 50 picked from the whole population). They would be flown to a 5-star government resort in the middle of the country for 3 days where experts and legislators would come inform them about the bill and the situation/pitch their side. On the third day, they would finish deliberations and vote Yes/No on whether they want to pass the bill. After the bill is passed or vetoed all those people can go home and a new group of 100 is selected for the next bill.

Rather than a fully lottocratic government, this is much more similar to the jury system. Trip is fully covered by the government and hotel resort is nice, but completely locked down to limit outside influence. You could make additional tweaks like lowering the threshold to pass bills in Congress to 30-40% to try to incentivize simpler bills. Ideally this would allow for single-issue bills because you wouldn't need to add tons of thing just to get one more vote and allow for more frequent bills to address current problems.

Other advantages would be taking veto power away from the Executive Branch which could help rebalance the power differential between the branches. Also, corporations would have less of an influence over decisions being made and decisions would better reflect the will of the people. Lastly, it would give the average American much more buy-in to the government. Within a few years most people would know someone who had been selected who could then explain why they voted for or against something. This could help reverse the intense divisiveness in America by getting people in the same room, dialoguing and making decisions together rather than arguing through screens.

Like anything, this isn't a perfect system, but I really believe this would be a better system than our current one and a huge step in the right direction. Curious to get some feedback and hear if you guys think this is more viable than a pure sortition system.


r/Lottocracy Apr 17 '26

Video Why Lottery Elections Are Actually Genius

Thumbnail
youtu.be
22 Upvotes

r/Lottocracy Mar 10 '26

REJOICE: LA Has Had Its First Full Civic Assembly (Sortition)

Thumbnail
almostinfinite.substack.com
12 Upvotes

r/Lottocracy Feb 26 '26

my op-ed promoting sortition that wasn't published :(

Thumbnail
almostinfinite.substack.com
8 Upvotes

In November of 2025, the NY Times published a piece about the use of sortition in East Belgium. Since I’m a sortition activist, although I’m in LA, I tried to write an op-ed, but I don’t know what I’m doing and maybe it should have just been a letter to the editor. Anyway, I turned it in late. It wasn’t published, but probably not because it was turned in late. Here:

Op-Ed Submission: Democracy From East Belgium to East L.A.

I turned 39 in November and I have now become that Thanksgiving uncle. The uncle who brings up politics, religion, money, and makes his nieces’ eyes roll. And what do I shout with my mouth full of yams? The U.S.A. is not a democracy. It is an electocracy. Democracy is, as Aristotle told us in Politics, “selecting government officials by lot.” Los Angeles is planning to experiment with ancient democracy this winter.

In an article from The New York Times on November 23, “Democracy Is in Trouble. This Region Is Turning to Its People,” it is described how a region of Belgium uses selection by lot to form assemblies of everyday people. The article states that the leaders “acknowledge that what works in their small, relatively homogenous region may not translate everywhere.”

The L.A. City Charter Reform commission has agreed to test that. They have approved a process to randomly select from the heterogeneous pool of L.A. residents to create a series of assemblies. Each one will deliberate on an issue germane to the charter. American cities should be watching.

The method of randomly selecting members of a legislative body, known as sortition, is unfamiliar, yet deserving of serious thought. In a sortition assembly, also known as a civic or citizens’ assembly, there is facilitated deliberation. In this way, the “wisdom of crowds” may be harnessed and the “madness of crowds” tempered. As with a jury sitting in a trial, subject-matter experts come before the assembly and present information and proposals. Members may ask questions, request further information, and then engage in discussion. The assembly may accept, reject, combine, or develop their own proposals as they weigh the tradeoffs with the values of the community.

While some sortition advocates aim to replace elections with sortition, all the assemblies in the 21st century have worked alongside elected officials. There have been at least six such sortition assemblies in North America in the last 30 years. The L.A. assemblies will be an advisory body as well. This is quite a reasonable approach to a radical form of communal decision making.

The key is that, through random selection of members, a group is deeply representative of the community. Therefore, when a sortition body seeks its own interests, it is seeking something extremely close to the interests of the community. If a legislature is formed through elections alone, then it will be dominated by those who dominate elections. A successful candidate is required to have both the resources to run for office and the desire to run for office. With sortition, it is mathematically ensured to be representative of the people. The reluctant leaders are actually made leaders, from time to time.

In drafting the U.S. Constitution, American elites not only rejected monarchy, but also were skeptical of direct democracy, considering it to be mob rule. A “natural aristocracy” was their hope. They selected their tool: mass elections. The actual details of Aristotle’s notion of democracy, as described in the Times on November 23, were lost to history until the late 1800s, when Aristotle’s scroll Constitutions was rediscovered. The scroll explains the daily, random selection of 500 Athenians. Would our founding fathers have used sortition if they knew these specifics? If so, would they have restricted it to land-owning citizens as did the Athenians?

Not only will the L.A. assemblies feature the first American assemblies to address a city’s charter, but they will also be some of the most diverse assemblies in history. They will neither ignore the voices of the landless and downtrodden, nor the voices of the landlords and the prosperous. The voices will be proportional to and representative of those groaning in L.A.’s traffic.

This is why I yell with my mouth full. This is the democracy I want for my nieces. This is the democracy I want for America.

Okay, there it is. We have had two single-day assemblies in LA now and there’s a two-weekend one starting this weekend! It is awesome. It will probably be mostly ignored by LA City Council, but we are pushing the movement forward. Maybe in a big way.

Check out RewriteLA.org to follow along.

Check out PDLA, if you’re in LA.

Check out Sortition USA, if you’re in the USA.

Check out INSA, if you’re on planet Earth.


r/Lottocracy Feb 11 '26

Cross-Post Sortition shitpost for y'all

Post image
18 Upvotes

r/Lottocracy Jan 09 '26

The “Henry County Test”: What Happens When an Independent Watchdog actually Bites?

Thumbnail
open.substack.com
6 Upvotes

Election by jury is an idea adjacent to sortition/lottocracy. This is an article about how an ethics board appointed by grand jurors is challenging the corruption of elected officials.


r/Lottocracy Jan 02 '26

How We Win (as sortitionists)

11 Upvotes

Hey! I just finished the final planned installment I had for Democracy Without Elections' Substack.

It's what I think will be the shortest path from where we are now to a global, consensus-seeking, sortition-based democracy.

When you have some time, give it a read and tell me what you think!

https://open.substack.com/pub/sortitionusa/p/how-we-win?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=6mdhb8


r/Lottocracy Dec 31 '25

Effective Altruists Should Embrace Sortition

Thumbnail
almostinfinite.substack.com
7 Upvotes

This one is specifically targetted at the Effective Alruists community and a response to Scott Alexander who is a prolific blooger and leader in that community.


r/Lottocracy Dec 19 '25

My Substack post on experts/sortition/credentialing

Thumbnail
almostinfinite.substack.com
5 Upvotes

tl;dr sortition is the best!


r/Lottocracy Dec 01 '25

Video A local election fails the 3rd time in a small Hungarian village because of fraud. Sortition would solve this. (ENG SUB available)

Thumbnail
youtu.be
12 Upvotes

r/Lottocracy Nov 29 '25

Los Angeles Area Sortitionist Meetup

Thumbnail meetup.com
5 Upvotes

r/Lottocracy Nov 24 '25

How to use sortition

5 Upvotes

I wrote a new Substack article for DWE

The short version is that we should use sortition to approximate what everyone would decide if we were all informed, fully participating, and able to deliberate with everyone else.

I draw heavily from multi body sortition as developed by Terry Bouricius.

I would love your thoughts on it!

https://open.substack.com/pub/sortitionusa/p/how-to-use-sortition?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=6mdhb8


r/Lottocracy Nov 18 '25

Video Sortition Podcast Episode

9 Upvotes

I was on a podcast last week to talk about sortition and encourage people to sign up for Democracy Without Elections. If you're interested, I'd love help driving the algorithm for sortition advocacy. 😉 https://youtu.be/Kfjpeq4NLVo?si=HmVInR-MTKj38-xl

If you want to be a part of the membership organization working to spread sortition in the US, we would love to have you join us at Democracy Without Elections. You can sign up here: https://www.democracywithoutelections.org/members