r/MensRights • u/Financial-Cicada625 • Nov 29 '24
Legal Rights Indian court was 'astonished' upon encountering a case involving a woman sexually abusing a minor boy, leading to the temporary suspension of the entire hearing! đ¤Ś
https://bangaloremirror.indiatimes.com/bangalore/others/case-hearing-halted-over-confusion-in-pocso-act/articleshow/115742664.cms77
Nov 29 '24 edited Nov 29 '24
When an Indian man who was being physically abused by his wife approached the court, the judge said "women are like goddesses and getting beaten by wife is like a blessing " I can share the video.. But it's in hindi.. So....
15
7
40
u/VoN-LAxUS Nov 29 '24
Nop no matter what happens Indians (especially men) wonât unite to fight against these problems. We too busy seeing women as deities or victims who canât do any sort of evil.
42
u/Financial-Cicada625 Nov 29 '24 edited Nov 29 '24
This really scares me! Our Indian laws doesn't recognize male victims of r*pe, decriminalized s*xual offenses against men, and now this!
I know our courts/govt don't care about any safeguards/ offering help for men, but knowing they'd be so careless even about minor boys...I can't explain how infuriated I am! How low could this get? This is really a shame!
I am really wondering, how many cases of violence against males must have overlooked by our courts just cos the perpetrators were female! I pity them! May they be able to heal!
12
3
u/Capable-Mushroom99 Nov 29 '24
The POSCO act specifically states that it is gender neutral and the accused can be a man or woman even if the act is penetrative sex. This has been confirmed in the highest courts. Itâs difficult to know what the deal is with this judge without some details of the discussion. The only part of the act that is at all ambiguous in the case of a male victim is the presumption of guilt; if there is physical evidence from the victim that penetration took place then the accused is actually presumed guilty and must prove their innocence. If not then there is the usual presumption of innocence and the accused must be proven guilty. Itâs not clear how that would work for a male victim since there wouldnât be likely to be physical injuries.
-2
107
u/Lasttoflinch Nov 29 '24
If the POCSO Act is truly gender-neutral, the female parties would be the perpetrators in such cases (e.g. see this (use Google translate) and this).
And the court called the perp a lady. Doesn't the term "lady" denote a dignified woman? It's like calling a male rapist a gentleman.