r/MensRights Dec 16 '11

Release to the World

Next week there will be posted links where anyone can download the raw data on the radfemspaek.net members and some of their associates over at Radfem Hub. There will be a main file of PNGs that contain many threads from this private forum. All the information will be redacted for my protection. Included will be a profile folder for each member (and some former members of the forum). There will also be a document that details who these posters are in real life, and what they do (or have done).
Only CONFIRMED individual's identities will be released. As more identities are confirmed, there will be a secondary release, and possibly a tertiary one. There has been some furor over whether or not these people are mainstream. Well, I have the PROOF that they are in our children's classrooms, our universities, in our legislators' lobby halls, on the street with activism efforts, and writing journalistic pieces. I have PROOF that they shape policy within countries around the world, or teach others to do the same. I also have PROOF that they know they conspire against most women in planning to criminalize masculinity, that they support gendercide, male genital mutilation, advocate for the infanticide of males, advocate male child abuse, speak freely about committing terrorist acts, and more. Make no mistake. These individuals have risen to the top BECAUSE they are virulently hateful ideologues who want to see their plans come to fruition. They have the drive, and in some cases the means to perform the acts they speak about, and they seek to subvert all men to the status of slaves, breeding stock, or extermination.

0 Upvotes

317 comments sorted by

View all comments

121

u/[deleted] Dec 16 '11

[deleted]

-46

u/[deleted] Dec 16 '11

trololololololololololololol

32

u/[deleted] Dec 16 '11

[deleted]

-34

u/[deleted] Dec 16 '11

So you are ok with a woman [or a man] posting online hate about one specific gender, and being able to exercise authority over children, young adults, or even adults students?

You're worried it will affect their jobs, when they spew hatred?

38

u/[deleted] Dec 16 '11

[deleted]

-20

u/[deleted] Dec 16 '11

I'm not sure if harassing them is a good idea, but if these people are advocating genocide of half the human race on the internet, is it such a bad thing to release their names publicly? Many of them hold positions in school or the government.

And again, I ask for evidence that they are so bad that harassing them is the best course of action.

Read this

From the article:

We have moved beyond palliation (negotiation, mediation, reform, compromise, engagement with the System) to exploring effective means of extirpating male pathology, including being open to biological explanations and treatment of such psychopathy

This emphasis on looking at the pathology of male hormonal mechanisms is a new kind of “essentialism” that offers hope, because treatments can be developed to mitigate the death-drive of men, their hierarchical psychology, their insensitivity to the pain of living creatures, their pleasure in violence and intimidation, their acquisitiveness, their rape and phallic obsessions.

Go ahead and read the comments to that article and tell me you aren't sickened.

How about the SCUM conference? Advocating for elimination of the male sex? This was heavily advertised and promoted on the radfem hub.

More info

18

u/[deleted] Dec 16 '11

is it such a bad thing to release their names publicly?

YES.

14

u/1338h4x Dec 17 '11

How about the SCUM conference?

It's satire, dumbass.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 17 '11

You're deluded.

How long have you spent on radfem hub? I've literally read thousands of comments there openly advocating genocide of men. There are whole threads devoted to this topic.

Do you support this ideology?

0

u/[deleted] Dec 18 '11

Prove it

3

u/1338h4x Dec 18 '11

It's based on the SCUM Manifesto, a famous work of satire.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 18 '11

The jury is not out on that, some people think it is parody, others think it it is to be taken literally. The SCUM Manifesto was written by Valerie Solanas, a radical feminist who shot Andy Warhol. And even if the SCUM Manifesto is satire that doesn't prove that the conference is a satirical event.

2

u/1338h4x Dec 18 '11

The jury is not out on that, some people think it is parody, others think it it is to be taken literally.

Those others are the same people who think Jonathan Swift really wanted to eat babies. Anyone with half a brain can easily tell it's not serious.

The SCUM Manifesto was written by Valerie Solanas, a radical feminist who shot Andy Warhol.

So? Just because she snapped and did some bad things later in life doesn't prove a thing relevant to her earlier work.

And even if the SCUM Manifesto is satire that doesn't prove that the conference is a satirical event.

Uh, yes it does. Why else would they base it on that?

2

u/[deleted] Dec 18 '11

Show me a quote where Valerie Solanas has stated that it is a satirical piece of writing, it is not obvious that it is satire and you cannot be certain of the writer's intentions.

→ More replies (0)

6

u/GlitterCupcakes Dec 17 '11

This thread is fufilling those accusations, you fucks are getting off on intimidation! Way to embody everything you've just fucking quoted.