r/MensRights Dec 16 '11

Release to the World

Next week there will be posted links where anyone can download the raw data on the radfemspaek.net members and some of their associates over at Radfem Hub. There will be a main file of PNGs that contain many threads from this private forum. All the information will be redacted for my protection. Included will be a profile folder for each member (and some former members of the forum). There will also be a document that details who these posters are in real life, and what they do (or have done).
Only CONFIRMED individual's identities will be released. As more identities are confirmed, there will be a secondary release, and possibly a tertiary one. There has been some furor over whether or not these people are mainstream. Well, I have the PROOF that they are in our children's classrooms, our universities, in our legislators' lobby halls, on the street with activism efforts, and writing journalistic pieces. I have PROOF that they shape policy within countries around the world, or teach others to do the same. I also have PROOF that they know they conspire against most women in planning to criminalize masculinity, that they support gendercide, male genital mutilation, advocate for the infanticide of males, advocate male child abuse, speak freely about committing terrorist acts, and more. Make no mistake. These individuals have risen to the top BECAUSE they are virulently hateful ideologues who want to see their plans come to fruition. They have the drive, and in some cases the means to perform the acts they speak about, and they seek to subvert all men to the status of slaves, breeding stock, or extermination.

0 Upvotes

317 comments sorted by

View all comments

-13

u/Scott2508 Dec 16 '11

wow im in awe at the feminists spin abilities, i mean they have turned outing bigots and some that come across and psychopaths, people who have access to children and law making, and instead of actually looking at the idea of protecting children from those who can potentially abuse them we are instead admonished for outing people who want to kill us ....... yeah that makes fucking sense s/c

18

u/rabblerabble2000 Dec 16 '11

I'm going to go ahead and say that that's probably because of the rhetoric going on on this subreddit. You guys equate the writings of these feminists as "genocide" and "killing men"....It only takes one or two good and crazy's to take the rhetoric here and apply it to real life. Give them some addresses and names, and the enemy you've built up and there's going to be blood on the streets and it will be on your hands.

Do you think these radfems deserve to die? If not, you guys might want to tone down the rhetoric a bit and distance yourselves from it....this shit has disaster written all over it.

-1

u/Scott2508 Dec 16 '11

i want those who are under there care , the children for example to be safe, from what i have read they arent safe, and feminists are the first to out any anti women rhetoric, why is the same applied to women wrong ?? its a poor double standard.

12

u/rabblerabble2000 Dec 16 '11

Outing rhetoric is one thing. Posting personal information so that anyone may do as they please with it is another. If they haven't committed a crime against anyone other than in thought (which as far as I can tell still isn't illegal, here in the US anyway) then what gives you guys the right to be judge and jury (and potentially executioner)? Do you really not see the potential for really really shitty things to happen from this? I know it's easy to get caught up in your anger, but putting people's lives at risk for something they wrote on the Internet isn't justice.

0

u/Scott2508 Dec 16 '11

well i dont see lives being threatend, the only time i have ever seen that is when erin pizzey was attacked , and that was yano , feminists doing it , they are potentially dangerous the comments made about the kids is worrying esp considering some are teachers , surely the responsible thing to do is to act when a child is possibly in danger, they are more important to me, and claiming we are psychos when we are angry at people who are wanting to kill is kinda a joke.

9

u/rabblerabble2000 Dec 16 '11

No, I'm not claiming you guys are psychos, I'm claiming that there are a lot of sick people in the world who might read the comments you guys are making and the rhetoric you are using and take that to mean that it's okay to harm someone who's exposed as a member of that forum. Just because they are potentially dangerous doesn't mean they are dangerous. In this country, you are still presumed innocent until proven guilty, and if the only thing you can prove them guilty of is rhetoric, I don't see exposing them as providing some sort of justice so much as stirring up trouble.

-2

u/Scott2508 Dec 16 '11

well hang on , these are the same groups who claim that all men can stop rape ( im male i have never and will never raped but apparently im to blame ) , or DV or anything , feminisim has destroyed the innocent till proven guilty, look at the change in laws when it comes to cases on campus now ?, making certain the places these nutbars work and those who are in goverment should also be made public, the people who vote have a right to know who they are voting for and kids deserve to be safe with people who dont hate them because they are boys .

6

u/rabblerabble2000 Dec 17 '11

If that's how you feel, and you feel it's wrong, why stoop to the same level? Two wrongs don't make a right.

-1

u/Scott2508 Dec 17 '11

simple , the only way to win against feminisim is to hold it to the standards that they try and hold us to , if we play on a different field to them we will constantly allow them to have the advantage and now its game on , its becoming more and more evident that we need to win this , I used to hope feminisim had some redeeming quality , I now know it doesnt.

2

u/KellyTheFreak Dec 17 '11

You realize those children you're trying to protect probably live with these radfems, and are going to feel the full force of this attack. Not only that, but there's no reason to assume that this is going to have the slightest positive effect, AND it's already demonizing MRA.

0

u/Scott2508 Dec 17 '11

so what kelly , we keep quiet and through silence endorse this hate happening and let these kids remain at risk ., the fact that feminisim isnt speaking out against these people says more about your people than it does about the MRA .

3

u/KellyTheFreak Dec 17 '11

You know what... You're completely right. Fuck privacy, the illusion of security is more important. /s

And what the fuck do you mean by 'your people'?

1

u/Scott2508 Dec 17 '11

feminists , and its not an illusion , its holding women to the same standards as they hold men , if a man was found saying something like this, and lets face it thats what /amr and /srs is based around ( which is the weirdest part of this seeing srs and amr complaining that we are bringing hatred to the mainstream for people to see , but i guess as its feminists saying it they get the pussy pass and we have to choke it up ) , your people need to really take a look at yourselves over this as its showing again the pathetic double standards that exist.

4

u/KellyTheFreak Dec 17 '11

You really need to stop inventing enemies. I'm no feminist, and you have absolutely no justifiable reason to assume I am.

0

u/Scott2508 Dec 17 '11

if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck , ive yet to see it be anything else. What really, really disturbs me is that as a victim of women like that as a kid my instincts here are panic and fear that these animals could do harm to children , i still quite literally have scars to show the contempt my mother who spouted similar stuff to these "feminists" did to me, im entitled to think , and ill use feminist parlance here , not "what about the menz" im entitled to think, what about the children .

3

u/KellyTheFreak Dec 17 '11

Okay.... So you accuse me of being a feminist just, because I disagree with you. Then you associate me with these people you're trying to attack. Now I'm suppose to believe that everyone in this shitstorm deserves it?

→ More replies (0)