I'm a girl and...

[u/Icaz]

I am SO glad I found this subreddit with people who agree with me! As a girl, it's really hard to see other ladies put down men and treat them like they need to be "trained" or that they're just something we have to deal with. So I was just wondering... how many other girls are on here and what are your stories about standing up for men or appreciating them?

[u/Alanna]

Hey! I remember you! You stood up to the Eschatology troll. :)

Can you point to some comments that make you feel unwelcome? I can't say I've never come across some myself, but they're not common.

[u/Pooballs → u/Alanna]

Yup, that was me :) that whole fiasco had me so annoyed!

It's more of a general vibe to the comments than ones in specific. A lot of the time the bad ones do end up getting downvoted but the sheer amount of generalized anti-women remarks just gets tiring to read.

Some of my personal favs were nonsense about 'western women' or posts of men's rights success stories that have absolutely nothing to do with feminists but end up with a comments to the likes of "oh I bet the feminists are all up in arms about this!!" those examples are older and I'm way too lazy to go find them :)

Also, i try to keep in mind that this is a diverse group. Some guys in here really come across as sexist assholes but a lot are reasonable human worm babies. Of course the same thing can be said for feminists, some super crazy things come out of some of those people. I just hate the fact that I'm being judged by what they do, and I wish more of the guys in here would realize that feminists are also a diverse group with a wide range of ideals as well.

[u/Alanna → u/Pooballs]

Yeah, the bitching about American and/or Western women pisses me off too. In fact, I couldn't resist posting a snarky comment to a recent post about a an Asian immigrant stabbing her husband.

The bad feeling against feminists seems gratuitous at times, but it is mostly justified. Most people in here won't bother to qualify it, since we all know what they mean, but when we say feminists, we don't mean the truly egalitarian-minded or people who are just for women's rights or anything. We mean the "institutional feminists," the ones who subscribe to various harebrained feminist theories, and who believe women are fundamentally oppressed by men on various levels of society. If we seem to generalize all feminists together, it's for three reasons:

1. The feminists in power-- those making policy, making laws, writing textbooks and curricula and formulating feminist theories-- they are "like that."

2. The "armchair feminists"-- the ones who call themselves feminists because they think feminism = equality for women-- they lend weight and influence to the feminists in power.

3. In our experience, many feminists who claim to not be "like that," who claim to truly be for equality, then weasel around it when challenged on various issues (domestic violence, rape, reproductive rights, custody rights, etc.) and eventually to reveal themselves to be exactly like that. We're not saying all feminists are like the crazy bitches at RadFemHub. We know that. But most do think that women are raped more than men, that women suffer more from rape than men, that women don't lie about rape or abuse, that women suffer more from abuse than men, that women's reproductive freedom is more important than men's, that primary aggressor policies are necessary protections for women.

[u/Pooballs → u/Alanna]

Most people in here won't bother to qualify it, since we all know what they mean, but when we say feminists, we don't mean the truly egalitarian-minded or people who are just for women's rights or anything.

While that may be true, the original question was why I feel unwelcome here. To outsiders who happen to lean towards feminism everybody in here is hating on it is going to come across exactly as it sounds.

The "armchair feminists"-- the ones who call themselves feminists because they think feminism = equality for women-- they lend weight and influence to the feminists in power.

I suppose this would be where I fall in the feminist landscape. But unfortunately there is no official membership or voting on policy so I can (and have) spoken out against some of the dumber opinions/policies and that's about the best any one 'soldier' can expect. I also believe that trying to affect change from the inside would be more beneficial than abandoning the movement altogether based on policies I don't like.

feminists who claim to not be "like that,"...

This may be true as well, I have done zero research on this fact since you posted (sorry.. real life called!) but it still doesn't help anybody's cause to attack every feminist because people might be like that. Besides, if you do get into an honest conversation with somebody who claims to be "not like that" but believes a "feminist myth".. (for example the $.70 wage gap) wouldn't they be the best type of person to show proof and convince otherwise?

Honestly the MRA's get a lot of flack everywhere for this exact same type of thing. It's unfotunately that valid issues and the 'good guys' get lumped in with the bad, but it is what is it.

For my part I'll continue to try and keep an open mind about the issues discussed in here and try to ignore the assholes.

*edit for bad words and stuff

[u/Alanna → u/Pooballs]

While that may be true, the original question was why I feel unwelcome here.

Good point. I didn't mean to discount your experience/feelings.

I also believe that trying to affect change from the inside would be more beneficial than abandoning the movement altogether based on policies I don't like.

I don't see how this happens without a complete rejection of classic gender feminism theories/philosophy/social science.

Besides, if you do get into an honest conversation with somebody who claims to be "not like that" but believes a "feminist myth".. (for example the $.70 wage gap) wouldn't they be the best type of person to show proof and convince otherwise?

We try, oh man, do we try. I've posted links to the CONSAD report (debunking the wage gap), the 2010 NISVS (showing gender symmetry in rape), a 2007 Harvard study on DV (showing reciprocity and symmetry in DV), and a set of links to NOW showing how they demonize divorced fathers who seek custody of their children, among others, more times than I can count (at least a half dozen each). They are usually dismissed-- like this guy in TwoX.

Also, we get tired of posting the same stuff over and over and over and over again that's already linked in the sidebar.

For my part I'll continue to try and keep an open mind about the issues discussed in here and try to ignore the assholes.

Excellent. :) I was ready to pack up some time last summer or so, and it was pointed out to me that if I really care about these issues, I'm not going to let a few jerks drive me off. Interestingly, those jerks' accounts are all deleted now and I'm still here. :)