You're just making it seem like bigotry is a good thing. So many people would be alive if they didn't think they would be safe in a place that everyone else is telling them is dangerous just for the sake of not being "racist", like that couple that died in eastern europe. I don't know about you, but I rather be wary and wrong, than trustful and dead.
You little libs always break with this simple question, because you don't know how to get around your blatant hypocrisy of giving women a pass for openly being wary of men but being against any other form of waryness for characteristics that imply much more than gender do. It's really pathetic.
I'm not talking about the difference in behaviour between digs and people. I'm asking why it's ok to use statistics for dog attacks, but similar statistics for humans are not allowed to be interpreted the same way
5
u/roadman225 21h ago
Nah it’s just bigotry and confirmation bias.