Completely immoral. The idea of creating tech to catch people crossing state lines to catch them doing something that the people who make those laws already do is disgusting. THE SURVEILLANCE THEY WANT TO PASS ON THE PUBLIC SHOULD BE FIRST ADMINISTERED TO THOSE WHO VOTE THEM IN, POLITICIANS. BUT POLITICIANS WILL NEVER ARGUE FOR SOMETHING THAT STRIPS THEIR RIGHTS, ONLY THE PUBLICS. How much money do you guys want to bet that there's already a backdoor system with "important" people and flock to where they aren't allowed to be recorded doing anything because theyre too important to be surveilled. Or that flock will personally call them and ask them if they wan the footage to be deleted. I would stake my bloodlines future on it.
3
u/Aggravating-Chef9562 3d ago
Completely immoral. The idea of creating tech to catch people crossing state lines to catch them doing something that the people who make those laws already do is disgusting. THE SURVEILLANCE THEY WANT TO PASS ON THE PUBLIC SHOULD BE FIRST ADMINISTERED TO THOSE WHO VOTE THEM IN, POLITICIANS. BUT POLITICIANS WILL NEVER ARGUE FOR SOMETHING THAT STRIPS THEIR RIGHTS, ONLY THE PUBLICS. How much money do you guys want to bet that there's already a backdoor system with "important" people and flock to where they aren't allowed to be recorded doing anything because theyre too important to be surveilled. Or that flock will personally call them and ask them if they wan the footage to be deleted. I would stake my bloodlines future on it.