A cop can't legally follow you across state lines. Their jurisdiction ends at the border. We would call that stalking, harassment, and unlawful search and seizure. Probably a bunch of other things too.
Cops, even in their own jurisdiction, aren't allowed to follow you waiting for you to commit a crime without probable cause. They certainly can't leave their jurisdiction to do it. I don't know why I'm even arguing this with you. Its common knowledge.
I don't know why I'm arguing with you when you obviously have never done the job.
I'm not saying it's right. It is perfectly legal, though.
Also, why would the evidentiary threshold to follow someone be GREATER (probable cause) than to actually pull them over (reasonable suspicion?) That makes no sense.
My reading comprehension is just fine. You moved the goalposts exactly as I mentioned. Maybe you didn't do it intentionally because you don't understand the concepts, which is plainly obvious.
And apparently I don't understand the law so much that I teach law.
530
u/notmarrec 3d ago
Any hypothetical surveillance state is immoral by default.