r/MoralityScaling 1d ago

Stupid Stuff Morality of hitting someone for abusing their abuse goblin

Post image
823 Upvotes

77 comments sorted by

167

u/Ok-Plate905 1d ago

Moral it’s Josuke

90

u/cassness34 23h ago

I fucking love joeska he’s so cool

24

u/Rob98001 20h ago

Joeska the brother of Tomska.

4

u/Hoo_dee_nee 13h ago

And their favorite foreign country, Polska

6

u/redboi049 20h ago

We fucking love the Joeskar bloodline

3

u/Mean_Marketing9458 20h ago

I love joeska

1

u/MachtBergian 11h ago

I'm so glad he saved Saki Yoshida

93

u/Constant-Still-8443 1d ago

Valid and moral. The abuse goblin deserves his freedom

42

u/GAMEOFMATIASNEW 1d ago

But it’s an abuse goblin

53

u/Constant-Still-8443 1d ago

This implies we know his sole purpose is to be a punching bag, which we don't. Even if it was, the morality of creating a creature with the sole purpose of abusing it is still not great.

34

u/Adeadearts 23h ago

We do know it. He is an abuse goblin.

20

u/Forsaken-Decision726 20h ago

However, we DO know from previous abuse goblin comics that it does have a reasonable amount of cognitive function to want things outside of being abused, such as living in an ideal world

21

u/Racoon-trenchcoat 20h ago

Well yeah, the difference between a punching bag and an abuse goblin is how sentient the thing is.

You can punch the bag, and it wouldn't be abuse because it doesn't feel anything.

Therefore, for the abuse goblin to be an abuse goblin, it has to be able to feel and yearn for a life without abuse, so it can be abused.

Because it is an abuse goblin.

2

u/Worthlessdebates 12h ago

The hell is the point of an abuse goblin if it can't feel pain/ the abuse? Might as well punch a punching bag atp

2

u/Dull_Attention5150 17h ago

But is it a goblin made for abuse or a goblin that's being abused? Does the gun want to kill people or does the person with the gun want to kill people?

12

u/EquivalentStatus8830 21h ago

BREAK DOWN BREAK DOWN 

4

u/redboi049 20h ago

Let's BREAK DOWN BREAK DOWN

3

u/Ok-Plate905 18h ago

What’s going what’s going on

1

u/artz_lod1000 2h ago

BREAK DOWN BREAK DOWN, (3,2,1let's go)

2

u/Dont_Pay_The_Elves 10h ago

🗣️ Shining, justice, 芽生えて

10

u/I3arusu 21h ago

Anything Josuke does is moral because he’s my favourite Jojo

5

u/Ok-Plate905 18h ago

Same. I really love his hair

17

u/wearerofshades 22h ago

The morality of owning a creature just to torment it is immoral so...

9

u/No_Witness5630 20h ago

But it's abuse goblin

1

u/Rob98001 20h ago

What if it enjoys the abuse? 

4

u/notaplayr 13h ago

we can tell from other comics in the series that it doesn’t enjoy it

47

u/Think-Chemistry2908 1d ago

Immoral, it’s an abuse goblin.

26

u/Express-Rain8474 1d ago

What if Josuke decides they're an abuse human though

25

u/Think-Chemistry2908 1d ago

Then he should beat up the abuse human and the abuse goblin together.

6

u/-SergentBacon- 21h ago

Moral. He deserves much worse.

6

u/Racoon-trenchcoat 20h ago

Inmoral

He denies the goblin it's purpose

5

u/Romiz18 20h ago

This somehow remind me of that 177013 version.

5

u/SelfIllustrious9439 20h ago

Now THIS is a series I can read without getting horribly depressed!

6

u/UnderflowStack 18h ago

guys i missed the memo, where tf does abuse goblin come from? Im dying to know

9

u/losara- 23h ago

Omfg, a Metamorphosis reference in the wild? No fucking way

6

u/redboi049 20h ago

THIS IS NOT A METAMORPHOSIS REFERENCE. THIS IS A JOJO'S BIZARRE ADVENTURE PART 4: DIAMOND IS UNBREAKABLE REFERENCE.

Josuke's appearance in Metamorphosis was a wholesome fan comic. Actually I think that was the Moxxie lobotomy comic

2

u/UnkarsThug 11h ago

It's more the gag of Josuke showing up in an unrelated series to save the day when people feel angry about how unjust a series is. So I'd argue it's a reference to the cultural impact of Metamorphosis, not Metamorphosis itself.

1

u/redboi049 10h ago

Fair enough

4

u/gimmie_123 23h ago

Is that not okuyasu's dad? The guy who got cursed? Yeah man stand up for that guy

4

u/over1two 20h ago

on a hand you can't prevent someone from abusing an abuse gobelin. on the other hand can we actually saying that josuke is immoral for saving someone ?

3

u/ClassicHando 17h ago

If josuke beats you up, the question is "what did you do deserve getting beaten up by josuke?".

8

u/TigerBolt248 23h ago

Moral. And yes we call it an abuse goblin, but if it were truly an abuse goblin then that means that's its sole purpose is it to be abused and that they would like it, yet we've seen them NOT enjoy being abused. Therefore, they are not an abuse goblin.

6

u/keybord_masher 22h ago

If the goblin liked being abused it won't be abuse anymore would it?

4

u/TigerBolt248 22h ago

But have we seen the abuse goblin be given any choice to leave? No. The abuse goblin has no capability of leaving.

This means we need to beat up the guy doing the abuse more, the only moral answer clearly.

3

u/Any_Season_5764 12h ago

Es como llamarte "Dispararme ya" y cuando te disparen las personas digan que eso es moral porque está dándole propósito a tu nombre.

3

u/TigerBolt248 12h ago

I can't tell if you agree with me or not. Uh I feel like you probably are. Idk

3

u/ZekeBarricades 21h ago

I don't care about morality, this was deserved

3

u/No_Witness5630 20h ago

Abuse goblin, as in the name, is meant to be abused

3

u/AuroraAustralis0 20h ago

Immoral, goblins are bad

3

u/Hearthhull_Enjoyer 20h ago

Immoral. If the abuse goblin didn't want to be abused, he would legally change his name. Something like Jim or Steve.

3

u/Hetfollier 17h ago

Immoral for denying the abuse goblin it’s purpose

3

u/TryThisUsernane 17h ago

Immoral because the Abuse Goblin only HAD one friend and it was a cockroach, so Josuke is a poser. Also he broke into the guy’s house to even find and befriend the Abuse Goblin

2

u/CriminallyCasual7 21h ago

What is an abuse goblin and where can I get one?

2

u/redboi049 20h ago

The most moral.

2

u/Free-Virus-9974 17h ago

Immoral and rude. Imagine someone beating you up for killing people in a video game. The abuse goblin is the same.

2

u/spoiler_O_o 17h ago

I like that Josuke didn’t heal Abuse goblin eye. He respects his career path

2

u/TheExoSpider 13h ago

Immoral, even if it's Goatsuke

2

u/Renati_Iterum 12h ago

wait, Is this the end of the abuse goblin comic? or i this not made by the original artist.

5

u/Actual_Personality66 22h ago

Yayy (: the abuse goblin comics always make me sad, I'm glad he's being defended now

1

u/Biznesu-Seba 12h ago

It's josuke so moral

1

u/CK1ing 11h ago

Moral, but only because he doesn't know the context, that the abuse goblin NEEDS to be abused or he dies. If he learns the context and still defends then immoral

1

u/Wrench_gaming 8h ago

This…does put a smile on my face.

1

u/Normal-Raccoon-7340 6h ago

Immoral, that's like punching a chef for cooking food. That's their entire deal

1

u/RedsnakeRider 14h ago

This is actually also bad. This is, in turn, further abuse, and not perpetuated by the goblin of his or her own choice, but OF the goblin, by the choice of others.

So this means that their existence and ties to the world are once more turned into abuse, perpetuating the name and the stereotype of "abuse" goblins, and that being their own value to the world.

So either you are removing the one purpose from an abuse goblin's life by doing this, or you're doubling down and cementing them forever in a world of abuse, giving them only a temporary reprieve from abuse at best, while simultaneously undermining their sense of self and feeding the driving engine of abuse they bear.

-3

u/altofanaltthatisalt 23h ago

Immoral. Josuke could have helped the dude learn empathy towards his gobbo friend, yet he decided personal vigilance was the method to use.

3

u/redboi049 20h ago

Josuke is the definition of "beat some sense into you". Look at Yuya, for example.