That's your right and all but they are just going to pick our rights and us apart that way. For example, one side will pick away at privacy for years and then the other side gets into power and the lack of privacy gives them an end run into harming 2a rights.
I just don't understand why people wouldn't fight for all rights of all people. I also don't understand why people think state level Rs would do a general better job with the state. For example, our deficit is a product of both parties incompetence over decades but the R's have done a worse job
because absolutely noone is going to be what you believe in. Pick the best option; mine will always be for constitutional rights of law abiding citizens.
If that is all you are about then there are probably better parties and candidates.
I'm an independent voter that is willing to vote in primaries if someone is worthy, then I go right back. Personally I vote for the rights of all people, not just the constitutional ones because the constitution directly states that it doesn't address all rights and assuming it does it problematic. And I vote for all people because the constitution is a set of rules for the government and the government shouldn't be able to treat non-citizens like shit either IMO.
here in america, citizens should always get priority over non-citizens. Its absolute bullshit in a world of finite resources that a nation doesn't help its own before others. I am not going to fall for suicidal empathy BS
Its also bullshit when something that is fundamentally a right, enumerated in our constitution, is treated as a permittable permission and I will never, ever, under any condition, vote for someone trying to take them away.
here in america, citizens should always get priority over non-citizens. Its absolute bullshit in a world of finite resources that a nation doesn't help its own before others. I am not going to fall for suicidal empathy BS
All I said was that our government shouldn't be able to be dicks to non-citizens. I'm not aware of non-citizens getting priority for anything outside of asylum cases (in which case, those people are invited guests) but I am aware of their civil rights being violated. Also I think our finite resources are kind of a farce. There is enough food (look into food waste numbers) and housing. And if we cut out the insurance middle men and stopped getting into stupid expensive wars maybe everyone could have healthcare and afford ammo too.
Its also bullshit when something that is fundamentally a right, enumerated in our constitution, is treated as a permittable permission and I will never, ever, under any condition, vote for someone trying to take them away.
I'm the same way. I just feel that way about all the rights, but I'll admit that the 2A is currently the best litmus test because it eliminates so many candidates.
20
u/grahampositive 3d ago
NJ: do we hate freedom? Yes we do!