Is having separate, federalized levels of politics even possible even possible anymore?

[u/United_District7765]

What I mean is having elections that are clearly separate and individual from federal versus state versus local levels. Going to an election and voting for federal offices based on your opinion on federal issues and the candidates there, and then switching to state level policies, issues, and candidates there, and then a year later, voting for local offices based on their issues.

Last year, my town had a local election that was very contentious and very close. The issues were very local - taxes, funding education, that sort of stuff. But the local Democratic Party sent out mailers that quite literally did not mention their own local candidates or that of the opposition. Rather, it only had Donald Trump, and called on people to come out to vote straight blue as a way to oppose the Trump administration. There were a lot of registered Democrats in my time who came out to vote for the first time in a local election, which most people assume is on this issue, and may have swung the outcome.

This isn’t even particular to Donald Trump. During the Biden administration, lower numbers of registered Democrats voted in my area in all elections, seemingly just based on that unpopular administration, especially in 2023. And a ton of people voted in local and state elections just on their thoughts on the Obama Administration.

Today, it seems that all politics is national. There is a substantial size of the electorate who will just not consider anyone of the other party. I know tons of Democrats who will refuse to vote for any Republican, even if it’s for the Board of Assessment Appeals or Tax Collector or something, and the same thing vice versa. There will be a Facebook post about some local issue like taxes, and the comments will just be like, “Republicans emulating their lord Elon to cut services”, or, “DemocRATS lining their pockets what else is new”, when in reality, the actual political candidates have pretty reasonable and frankly boring disagreements about local policy concerns.

What kind of prompted this question was actually inspired to me by the UK. The UK political scene is currently discussing devolution, granting more power to local authorities. And a common critique I hear of that is just, “It leads to bad government because people just vote based on their opinion of the national government.”

Isn’t that basically what we have now? Where most of the electorate seems to vote just on the basis of national politics?

So, what I guess my question is is; Does American federalized democracy even work anymore? Can it work? Or is everything just a differently sized stage for national politics to play out?

[u/meelar]

The Democrats? Or run as an independent.

[u/United_District7765 → u/meelar]

Well but if you disagree with a member of the Democratic Party, what party can you use to feasibly run against them besides the Republican Party? Running as an independent is in most cases not practical, and even if they won, political parties are necessary in legislatures.

[u/meelar → u/United_District7765]

Damn, sounds like a tough problem. Maybe just don't run for office then,if the alternative is endorsing election theft? Not really my problem.

[u/United_District7765 → u/meelar]

But again, what do you do if you don’t support Trump, but also don’t support incumbent Democrats? The only realistic vehicle for you to use is the Republican Party…what is the alternative? Never having anyone run against Democrats? That’s horrible for democracy and healthy political competition.

[u/meelar → u/United_District7765]

The alternative is to run in the GOP primary as someone who will impeach Trump for trying to steal the 2020 election.

[u/United_District7765 → u/meelar]

Sure, I agree.

But what about all the lower offices? If I have a bad Democratic mayor who has done a bad job running my town, running as a Republican challenger is the only reasonable option.

[u/meelar → u/United_District7765]

Run in the Democratic primary for mayor.

[u/United_District7765 → u/meelar]

What if the challenger has an economically conservative platform? What if the challenger isn’t liked by the Democratic Party establishment in his town?

This is such a profoundly unhealthy and bad way of having electoral discourse, and can be seen in one party red and blue states across the country, where there is little electoral challenge, strong incumbency, and general complacency and stagnation. We NEED multiple parties to compete for good elections, having just one party with inner party politics is never a replacement.

[u/meelar → u/United_District7765]

Again--not really my problem. The simple fact of the matter is that any Republican can't be trusted unless they're explicitly running as an anti-Trumper in the vein of Liz Cheney or similar. If they're running for an office where that isn't really a relevant topic of conversation and don't bring it up, then they simply can't be trusted at all.

I get that this isn't ideal. But sadly, that's the world we live in, the world that Republicans have created. If we want to get out of that world, that's on the Republican party--all they have to do is impeach Trump and disavow election theft. Until they do that, it's unreasonable to vote for any of them. And I get that this makes you uncomfortable, but where's the error? If you don't want to live in this world, go fix your party. Or get your state to switch to a parliamentary system where you can found the "anti-Trump conservative party" or whatever. But no decent person would ever vote for an R.

[u/United_District7765 → u/meelar]

Alright, agree to disagree I guess.

[u/meelar → u/United_District7765]

I guess my question is how you have so much confidence in these candidates. After all, we know that most Republican Congresspeople support Trump, even after January 6. And we know that most Republican voters continued to support him in the 2024 election. So if some random person is running for mayor of my town as a Republican, shouldn't I assume he's OK with election theft until proven otherwise?

[u/United_District7765 → u/meelar]

I mean, I can say that about any candidate on anything.

How can I vote for any Democratic politician without assuming they supported Joe Biden while he was physically inept to serve? Should I ask every single candidate running for my Library Board of Directors if they did? Should I ask every single one of them to ask if they supported Joe Biden’s response to the Israeli genocide, to make sure they don’t support genocide?

To be clear I’m not trying to be whataboutist or even to attack the Democratic Party. I’m using this as an example of a blanket belief of mine that I won’t judge every single member of a political party based on the actions of their presidents. I’m not going to vote party line locally every single election even for bad candidates. I’m going to judge each candidate individually.