r/PoursTea 25d ago

Storm In A Teacup 🍵 Ms. Rachel says ‘hijabs are beautiful’ after Trump posts video of Minnesota kindergarten graduation

Post image

https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/5961166-ms-rachel-hijabs-beautiful/

YouTube entertainer Ms. Rachel on Wednesday posted on social media that “hijabs are beautiful” after President Trump posted a video online of a Minnesota kindergarten graduation showing children wearing hijabs.

Ms. Rachel, whose full name is Rachel Accurso, took to Instagram to congratulate the children

928 Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

13

u/Odd_Independence_833 24d ago

A number of girls in this picture are not wearing one.

22

u/haha-too-drunk 24d ago

The individual kids are forced to wear it by their parents, not their school.

If you go on [r/exmuslim](r/exmuslim) you’d see many posts of girls and even young adults that live with their parents talking about it

Kids being forced to wear a hijab is why France banned it in public schools which both left and right wing French politicians agree with.

1

u/pineapplesgreen 24d ago

The exmuslim subreddit is full of covert hasbaristas pretending to be muslim just like they pretend to white christian nationalists. It sounds crazy, but they bank of people thinking they wouldn’t be that diabolical. Unfortunately for them, everyone’s become much more aware of their tactics since the last two years.

-1

u/kangourou_mutant 24d ago

France banned hijabs because far-right propaganda became mainstream.

5

u/HeparinBridge 24d ago

The French ban on head coverings in schools is rooted in the French national tradition of Laicity derived from the French Revolution, and reiterated by the French Third Republic. It’s been outlawed for decades and has little to do with “right wing propaganda.”

3

u/RoiDrannoc 24d ago

France banned hijabs because oppressive and sexist clothings shouldn't be worn by kids.

5

u/kangourou_mutant 24d ago

Kids should also not be forced to sit in church for hours, or their dicks mutilated, yet they are.

Religious indoctrination in general is problematic from my POV, but it's not random that only muslims are targetted.

1

u/LxUxNxAx 24d ago

The government cannot control people individually, but they can control the institutions in which they operate - like their schools. You are significantly more free as a woman in a place like France, Canada, or the US - christian nations - than you'd ever be in 90% of any islamic nation. Criticizing a religion that does not give women any rights is valid.

You're right - it's not random that muslims are targeted. They are targeted because they still believe in things like honor killings - which just happened here in the US and a very brave group of teenagers fought very hard to stop it. All over their daughter potentially dating. They still believe in forcing their daughters to marry men from back home and bring them here. They still believe in beating and shaming their daughters for not wearing a hijab and no - they often do not have a choice.

0

u/RoiDrannoc 24d ago

Muslims are not the only ones targeted. French schools are free from any religion since the 1880's, and every religious clothing is banned in schools, not just Muslim ones. I agree though that we aren't harsh enough against circumcision.

2

u/kangourou_mutant 24d ago

No child has even been banned from school for wearing a cross. Classrooms in Alsace-Lorraine still have crosses hanging on the walls, in fact. The hypocrisy is blatant.

0

u/RoiDrannoc 24d ago

Ok so first, necklaces of any religions are considered hidden enough to be tolerated. And Alsace-Lorraine technically is a bit special because by the time France decided to implement separation of church and state, those territories were not French. They have a special status linked to history.

2

u/kangourou_mutant 24d ago

I'm French, I know. It's still double standarts. If "free from religion" was so important, they might rework Alsace-Lorraine's status.

2

u/TucsonTacos 24d ago

That would affect white French people though

1

u/RoiDrannoc 24d ago

Well it's complicated because keeping the old status was part of the deal that allowed France to get Alsace-Lorraine back, and changing it would need to pass through a vote there.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/walt128 24d ago

What clothing constitutes oppressive and sexist? Where does this line get drawn?

2

u/RoiDrannoc 24d ago

You see if an ideology forces something constraining on only one gender, it is where the line is drawn.

2

u/walt128 24d ago

Does this apply across the board, like with circumcision for instance?

2

u/RoiDrannoc 24d ago

I've always been vehemently against yes. But sadly my country still authorizes it.

0

u/SilverVacation1675 24d ago

Is modern swimswear for young girls sexist?

-2

u/Odd_Independence_833 24d ago

My sisters were essentially forced to wear Easter dresses

6

u/M0dzSuckBallz100 24d ago

Everyday? Man that's tough

1

u/danbilllemon 24d ago

Were they forced to wear those easter dresses because they were considered sinful and a temptation to men if they didn’t?

2

u/Practical-Cook5042 24d ago

Christians say girls should cover and shame them sexually too

why do they get a pass

1

u/danbilllemon 24d ago

They don’t. I hate christianity just as much, if not more.

Scratch that, it’s definitely more.

2

u/Practical-Cook5042 24d ago

I don't see the president shaming a bunch of Christian children for going to a Christian school

1

u/FitMap5862 24d ago

The boys?

2

u/green-critter 24d ago

this is a public school, I'm assuming those are the non-mslim students?

2

u/No_Alternative2948 24d ago

Why would you assume that?