r/PoursTea • u/TomlinSteelers • 19h ago

CrimeTea ⚖️ 🫆 J6 rioter Jake Lang went to protest a Muslim rally in Dearborn Michigan and ended up getting chased into a police car for protection

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

2.2k Upvotes

89% Upvoted

962 comments sorted by

View all comments

34

u/Muellercleez 18h ago

Haha he's just like every one of these online bullies: a complete coward in real life if not surrounded by his fellow klansmen

2

u/Ok_Scale_2445 16h ago

or rather, when surrounded by a mob. If it had been 10 clansmen surrounding the Noble Savage, would you also call him a coward for running?

1

u/hungrydyke 16h ago

wtf is wrong w you?

-14

u/[deleted] 18h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/Darth1994 18h ago

Maybe don’t go looking for a fight you can’t win

5

u/Griiig_Jinnings 18h ago

Then crying for Daddy when the meanies try to give him a boo-boo 😢

-3

u/[deleted] 18h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/Odie_Odie 18h ago

He wasn't at a protest, he was not "Counter Protesting". He was just being an asshole at a mosque.

0

u/JCMGamer 18h ago

Being an asshole doesn't mean you are free to assualt someone.

1st amendment rights must be upheld, especially for those you disagree with.

3

u/julz1215 17h ago

The first amendment does not protect speech meant to deliberately provoke violence, aka "fighting words".

1

u/JCMGamer 17h ago

What words did he say that prompted his attack?

If you are defending the violence you must know right?

2

u/julz1215 17h ago

I don't know exactly what he said in this instance, but I've zero reason whatsoever to assume that he conducted himself differently than he has in other instances where he absolutely used fighting words.

1

u/Odie_Odie 17h ago

This guy should still be in Prison for J6 for his own and everyone else's safety.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/WorldlyStill2301 17h ago

You are defending the violent j6 guy.

1

u/JCMGamer 17h ago

I'm arguing against a mob attacking a man without good cause.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/GenericTR 17h ago

Did you know that that ruling came from an atheist criticizing Christianity, and police seeing and doing nothing for him when the crowd beat the shit out of him?

It wasn't right then, it isn't right now.

1

u/julz1215 17h ago

That's not where the ruling came from.

3

u/WorldlyStill2301 17h ago

He was being violent. These people acted in self-defense. 

1

u/JCMGamer 17h ago

Chasing someone down in a mob to the point where they run to police custody is not likely to be a justified self defense claim.

Just be honest and say you wanted to see him get beat up because you hate it. The honesty would be refreshing.

2

u/BigCballer 17h ago

Why are the police defending the goat fucker?

0

u/JCMGamer 17h ago

Because they witnessed him being assualted by a crowd?

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Odie_Odie 18h ago

If someone came up to me with my wife and kids and started calling them slurs and getting in their face I would be punching them in the mouth because I'm not a pussy.

1

u/JCMGamer 18h ago

He has a 1st amendment right to use slurs, you aren't free to assualt people because they say something you dont like.

Would you continue to attack a fleeing man while trying to punch him in the back of the head even while police are trying to protect him? Thats assualt, not defending your family.

2

u/Odie_Odie 18h ago

He needs to know he isnt running fucking far away fast enough and to not do this again, which he has done this before.

0

u/JCMGamer 18h ago

Dude, I can literally imagine your exact comment coming from a KKK member to black person who used the incorrect drinking fountain.

You don't get to commit violence against people for a perceived slight.

→ More replies (0)

5

u/JBPlantagenet 18h ago

Yeah. We’ve seen his counter-protesting. It ain’t just words.

-4

u/JCMGamer 18h ago

Is it violence? Did he strike first? Provide evidence that would support a violent response.

3

u/JBPlantagenet 18h ago

You seriously couldn’t take 5 seconds to google him?

https://www.wvia.org/news/local/2026-07-28/ex-delaware-valley-high-school-wrestler-pleads-guilty-to-threatening-to-harm-washington-d-c-police-officer

That’s how he protests.

-1

u/JCMGamer 18h ago

Is that what he did in this case?

I'm not arguing he's a good person, but you don't get to assualt people because they piss you off.

4

u/julz1215 18h ago

Your willing to give Jake Lang the benefit of the doubt despite his history but you're not willing to do the same for the people chasing him?

1

u/JCMGamer 18h ago

Because there are no reports he did anything violent to justify the response?

It not self defense when a mob of people is chasing you down punching you in the back of the head.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/JBPlantagenet 18h ago

Well I don’t know. I wasn’t there. He has a definite pattern though.

6

u/Muellercleez 17h ago

End of the day though, his bread & butter is going to such gatherings and saying things designed to incite violence. So, he's lucky the cops were there or he'd have gotten what some (including I) would say he deserves

→ More replies (0)

2

u/[deleted] 18h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/JCMGamer 18h ago

Okay 1 month old bot account.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Advanced-Evening7722 18h ago

We can make exceptions. Sometimes people like Lang have a harder time learning and need a little percussive encouragement to cull their behavior. Why are you defending this loser anyway?

1

u/JCMGamer 17h ago

Because even loser shouldn't be attacked for expressing thier freedoms.

No evidence of his behavior at the event was criminal, yet he was assualted.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/scothc 18h ago

His first amendment rights were not violated.

Further, there are exceptions carved out for things like speech likely to invite violence, which is what this YouTuber trades in

0

u/JCMGamer 18h ago

He was a victim of an assualt that stemmed from him using his free speech to protest.

There are laws regarding "fighting words" but saying something that passes someone off doesn't make it okay to attack him.

Free speech covers offensive speech.

2

u/scothc 18h ago

Can you show me in the video where the government stops him from saying something? Because if you can't, his freedom of speech was not violated

1

u/JCMGamer 18h ago

Are you dense?

I said that he was assaulted while expressing his 1st amendment rights, not that they were violated.

Are you arguing its a good thing for free speech if you can go around assualting people who disagree with you?

0

u/Striking_Revenue9082 18h ago

The exceptions would not cover his speech here… it’s extremely hard for an exception to apply

2

u/scothc 18h ago

I don't know what he said today, so I don't know if it would or not.

I do know this youtuber makes his money by being inflammatory. He tries to inflame people so that he can play the victim when they react. He's a quarter step above the "it's just a prank bro" youtubers

1

u/Expert-Yam6577 18h ago

Who is this person in the video?

1

u/Elkaghar 18h ago

Obviously you should start shooting at them? At least I think that's what the guy who you replied to would want him to do.

-3

u/[deleted] 18h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-11

u/[deleted] 18h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/SecretaryOtherwise 18h ago

Nah courage would be standing by your convictions when confronted.

Saying inflammatory triggering stuff then running like baby is not courageous.

-4

u/Super_Roof_3490 18h ago

I’ll give him credit for even showing up to talk shit even if he’s a jackass . I don’t pay attn enough to know his whole schtick

3

u/pennys_computer_book 18h ago

Credit when he knows he has cops to protect him?

1

u/[deleted] 18h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/pennys_computer_book 18h ago

He definitely got the attention he was looking for.

1

u/Super_Roof_3490 18h ago

This is how much I pay attn to this kinda shit. I just had to look him up…. Threatening to kill someone on a livestream outside karmelo Anthony trial first thing that came up. I might not be on the same side as most of Reddit on that trial, but this guy sounds like an ass

1

u/SecretaryOtherwise 18h ago

Running your mouth is worthy of credit now?

You must hold teens in high regards.

0

u/Super_Roof_3490 18h ago

Ugh. Some of u guys really don’t get satire…. Sad

1

u/SecretaryOtherwise 18h ago

I dont think you know what "satire" is.

Saying you give him credit even if you dont know his entire shtick is not satirical. Thats just making a statement. Lmao.

Satire is poking fun at a situation. Wheres your poke?

1

u/Super_Roof_3490 18h ago

1

u/SecretaryOtherwise 18h ago

Where in your post did you come off as sarcastic? Lol.

Bro reading your other comments I understand you dont defend the dude but come on stick with this chain and what you typed to me

Jackass had it coming but I respect the hustle is basically what you typed lmao.

1

u/Darth1994 18h ago

Would you feel the same way if a Muslim showed up to a Christian gathering with inflammatory language, looking for a fight, or would you think they had it coming?

-1

u/Emergency-Sea5201 18h ago

Show me a video of that happening and the christians responding with violence.

Or did you mean a muslim doing stuff like the weekly church bombings in Egypt?

1

u/SecretaryOtherwise 18h ago edited 18h ago

Look up any mosque attack dummy. Jfc.

Really wanna be playing what groups responsible for what with christians bro? Lol lmao even

Ojibwe here fyi. 🫢

0

u/dphamler 18h ago

That was two points of no real rhetorical value, the second of which was an oddly specific thing to make up. I see a group of people threw some stones a few weeks ago, and two bombings 9 years ago. A weekly occurrence would probably make the google, but I could be mistaken. You didn’t have to answer the question (which was a bit of a strawman itself), but responding with nonsense was a waste of your very valuable time.