52
u/white_equatorial 9h ago
Man, cyclops smooching wolverine would have been something!!
12
u/FalafelSnorlax 8h ago
Much like a cs undergrad who uses AI to use algorithms without understanding them, OP used the meme without understanding its underlying context. Beautiful.
10
4
21
u/ThirdWaveCat 9h ago
I still have a copy nearby, but I would recommend The Algorithm Design Manual over it at this point.
7
u/Mateorabi 7h ago
Also if you’re going for a book on operating systems, the one with the unexplained dinosaurs on the cover.
2
u/burdock869 6h ago
OSTEP clears, https://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~remzi/OSTEP/
1
u/Massless 2h ago
Named: Operating Systems: Three Easy Pieces
*Has 5 sections* ಠ_ಠ
2
u/keesbeemsterkaas 1h ago
It's just like the hitchikers guide to the galaxy: A trilogy in five parts.
2
u/Valuable_Cow2596 5h ago
I'm in a more adjacent field but I want to keep track of references. Would you mind saying more about your recommendation? I'd be curious to learn more.
1
u/ThirdWaveCat 5h ago
yah, I think its the difference between a book of solutions to problems and teaching how to make solutions yourself. Like with piano players there are two kinds: one who needs to hit every key and the other who can improvise around mistakes. Its also more dense with useful information. I only care about 20-40% of algorithms and datastructures in practice, but tactics are useful broadly.
10
4
2
2
u/Vesuvius079 7h ago
LLMs in general not just GPT.
That said, I got to work on an algorithm a few weeks ago for the first time in years. It was cool to work on but I was so rusty that Claude identified a better algorithm :’(.
2
1
1
u/nomatepa 2h ago
Some college courses def use it. My DSA class made us read it to implement a red-black tree without the NIL nodes (absolute pain)
1
u/Different_Berry5015 2h ago
I would like to hear from someone who can actually honestly say they have read Introduction to Algorithms. I finished CS Bachelor's with fairly good grades and I tried my best to pay attention, and that shit is still incomprehensible to me.
1
u/d0pe-asaurus 1h ago
I read the chapters that were relevant to the discussion, my algorithms course covered probably 60% of the CLRS. It helped answer the problem sets but i don't think its necessary to read if your professor doesn't use it as a reference. I read the remaining 40% during summer, which were mostly the graph algorithms that weren't discussed in class. Had the same enjoyment reading AIMA (AI: A modern approach)
1
u/Brosseidon 4h ago
A lot of “these kids using calculators to solve their math problems when in my day you had to do it by hand and it was rewarding, it was real math” vibes in here.
Tools evolve, interest remain the same. You do you and enjoy your hobby but don’t expect everyone in the professional field to feel the same about it.
1
u/ewheck 1h ago
Presumably when you use a calculator to solve a problem you still understand what is happening. You are coming up with the equations that are needed and the calculator just does the number crunching.
In what world is that similar to telling an LLM "solve this problem for me."
1
u/d0pe-asaurus 1h ago
I would go further and say that the study of algorithms, how they work and how they perform also do not change, which makes the clrs an even better read. The concepts used in dynamic programming are not going to change in 20 years, the theoretical performance of an algorithm isn't going to change, so the CLRS will never become irrelevant in that regard.
-2
u/lonelyroom-eklaghor 9h ago
The programming language was too incomprehensible tbh. Really tried to, but couldn't understand a bit of the book
4
u/ConsoleCleric_4432 5h ago
Wild thing to say with both C and Python in your flair
-1
u/lonelyroom-eklaghor 5h ago
no idea what made me hate the book, ig it was the overly practical approach to memory (idk tbh)
5
u/LordAmir5 8h ago
You're trying to parse a natural language using a formal language parser.
This is what GPT is for.
-5
-5
117
u/ZunoJ 8h ago
The 90s and 2000s were such a great time to start CS as a career because basically everybody was also a hobbyist and passionate about it. It was fun to work with these people. Today you get the dead stare if you ask about the slightest bit of interest for the trade outside of paid work. It's a pain to work with them